Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Shipston on Stour Town Council search

Form ID: 75239

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

The 20 minute neighbourhood is a flawed concept. Shipston on Stour can never meet this criterion in large areas of the Parish, following the last five years of new development. It obviously is not s concept that can be 'retro-fitted'.

Form ID: 75240

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 75241

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

None. Too far in the future.

Form ID: 75242

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Neutral

Option 3: Economy

Neutral

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Neutral

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 75243

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Form ID: 75244

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 75245

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

No account of the inadequacy of existing infrastructure to support the dwellings that have already been built. Many of these received planning assent before the Core Strategy was approved or even developed, therefore were not subject to any spatial considerations. Existing infrastructure shortfall needs to be addressed.

Form ID: 75246

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 75247

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option E2a: Include a policy which encourages businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2b: Do not include a policy encouraging businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2c: Include a policy which looks to identify sites or development zones which are targeted at businesses wishing to be innovative towards a low carbon economy.

selected

Form ID: 75248

Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option E3a: Include a policy expanding on SDC's current existing policy.

selected

Option E3b: Have separate policies for individual sectors.

selected

Option E3c: Include a policy that secures employment strategies through S106.

selected

Option E3d: None of these

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.