Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council search

Form ID: 76080

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-I1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Sustainability Appraisal, indicating clearly which element of the appraisal you are commenting on.

We believe the sustainability appraisal should be more transparent for the sites under consideration in order that members of the public can easily determine how individual sites are being viewed in the draft plan.

Form ID: 76082

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option I2a: Set out infrastructure requirements for all scales, types and location of development

selected

Option I2b: Focus on the strategic infrastructure relating specifically to the growth strategy

selected

Form ID: 76166

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-V3.1: Do you agree that the Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate?

Yes

Q-V3.2: If no, please indicate why

They look appropriate and achievable in a general sense but the options are 'blind' as to whether they impinge on or destroy the Green Belt. There is no reference to the importance and preservation of the Green Belt and the five purposes of the Green Belt should remain sacrosanct in any future Local Plan

Form ID: 76170

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-I4.1: Should we include a policy to safeguard specific infrastructure schemes within the SWLP?

Yes

Q-I4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about these specific safeguarding provisions

WDC should adopt a policy similar to that of Stratford

Form ID: 76171

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 76172

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option S2a: Identify areas considered particularly suited to intensification development, and develop a design code for each character area. Have a policy supporting intensification within these identified areas where it complies with the relevant design code.

selected

Option S2b: Have a policy with 'in principle' support for intensification development, applicable across South Warwickshire; and develop design codes

selected

Option S2c: Do not have a policy which encourages intensification

selected

Form ID: 76173

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

Agree with the concept but would expect all brownfield to be used prior to any development on greenfield

Form ID: 76174

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 76175

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 76178

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.