Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council search

New search

Form ID: 76182

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 76183

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Form ID: 76185

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Nothing chosen

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Form ID: 76187

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Nothing chosen

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Form ID: 76188

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 76217

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

We as a Parish Council are asking why there is no response space for comment on issue S6. It is almost as though Green Belt boundaries are being ignored and the five purposes of the Green Belt wilfully trampled over by all the other development considerations. The Spatial Growth Options all include significant incursions into the North Leamington and Warwick Green Belt flying in the face of maintaining the integrity of villages such as Leek Wootton, Cubbington, Old Milverton and Blackdown. The conclusions of the spatial growth workshops are dangerously flawed in maintaining Green Belt areas have little legitimacy. The Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing and Communities has asserted that local planning authorities are not expected to use Green Belt to deliver housing and the many constraints, particularly space, around North Leamington and Warwick should rule out any further housing development.

Form ID: 76218

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option E7.1a: Include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.1b: Do not include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.2a: Include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Option E7.2b: Do not include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Form ID: 76219

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-H1-1: The HEDNA is proposing that we move away from an approach where future household needs are based on the 2014-based household projections towards a trend-based approach. Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of housing need across South Warwickshire?

Yes

Q-H1-2: If your answer to H1-1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future housing needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 76221

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Q-H2-1: What is the best way to significantly increase the supply of affordable housing across South Warwickshire?

No answer given

Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement

selected

Option H2-2b: Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts

selected

Option H2-2c: A more localised approach with separate affordable housing requirements for different localities across South Warwickshire

selected

Q-H2-3: How should South Warwickshire best address the specialist needs for older people?

No answer given

Form ID: 76222

Respondent: Leek Wootton and Guys Cliffe Parish Council

Option H3a: Do not seek to include minimum space standards in a policy in the SWLP.

selected

Option H3b: Apply Nationally Described Space Standards to developments across South Warwickshire based on locally derived evidence.

selected

Option H3c: Include a requirement to meet optional Building Regulations M4(2)/M4(3) as standard. These are focussed upon ensuring appropriate accessibility standards.

selected

Option H3d: None of these

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.