Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting search

Form ID: 78469

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-V3.1: Do you agree that the Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate?

Q-V3.2: If no, please indicate why

Infrastructure should be in place before the homes are completed. No mention of integrated transport in S.Warks. Whole are is dependent on cars. Poor bus network. Need additional regional railway stations. EG Harbury. No rail connectivity Kenilworth to Warwick/Leamington/Stratford. No rail connectivity Statford to Leamington or Warwick. Major overhaul of transport vision and strategy required as a priority Homes and schools & social housing next to motorways given what we are learning about air pollution and the impacts on health. You are negligent and not providing a "healthy, safe & inclusive S. Warks"

Form ID: 78475

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-I1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Sustainability Appraisal, indicating clearly which element of the appraisal you are commenting on.

In any sustainability appraisal, there should be reference to local community need. In all five of the SA considered developments, there is no reference to local community need or opinion. All planning applications should have a weighted consideration of local community need.

Form ID: 78480

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Option I2a: Set out infrastructure requirements for all scales, types and location of development

selected

Option I2b: Focus on the strategic infrastructure relating specifically to the growth strategy

selected

Form ID: 78481

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

selected

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

selected

Form ID: 78484

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-I4.1: Should we include a policy to safeguard specific infrastructure schemes within the SWLP?

Nothing chosen

Q-I4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about these specific safeguarding provisions

Some of these schemes are unnecessary and suboptimal. They are piecemeal and show no overall integrated transport strategy. There is no benefit to South Warwickshire with HS2 for example. Why just park & ride for North Leamington?

Form ID: 78486

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

No mention of consideration of local community need.

Form ID: 78487

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 78493

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Option S2a: Identify areas considered particularly suited to intensification development, and develop a design code for each character area. Have a policy supporting intensification within these identified areas where it complies with the relevant design code.

selected

Option S2b: Have a policy with 'in principle' support for intensification development, applicable across South Warwickshire; and develop design codes

selected

Option S2c: Do not have a policy which encourages intensification

selected

Form ID: 78496

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

Brownfield sites must be prioritised. Class 3b agricultural land must not be considered for housing development.

Form ID: 78498

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.