Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting search

Form ID: 78500

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 78506

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-S5.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the seven potential new settlement options?

I would question any of your data on emissions estimation modelling. We know GLH is underway alongside the M40. We also know that the noise bund is already being reduced in height leading to more pollution. No reference to noise or light pollution in any of your vision or strategy. Why no measurement?

Form ID: 78512

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Nothing chosen

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Noise pollution for one reason. Why does there need to be new settlements unless the local community request it? SDC & WDC wanting more Council Tax income at any cost without thinking about infrastructure needs and the impact on existing adjacent communities

Form ID: 78519

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 78522

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 78526

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 78533

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

Local need prioritisation. Pollution.. noise, light & air must be measured and estimated. No more building alongside motorways. Infrastructure first!! Integrated transport systems. Too much is dependent on use of the car. Nothing about cycleways SWLP chasing income through Council Tax and ignoring local community needs.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.