Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership search

Form ID: 82643

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-S5.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the seven potential new settlement options?

Wherever possible ensure opportunities for sustainable and active travel are baked into plans

Form ID: 82644

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 82645

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Nothing chosen

Option 3: Economy

Nothing chosen

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Nothing chosen

Option 5: Dispersed

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 82647

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 82648

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

Q-S8.2: suggest we need some evidence base for the number Q-S10: Need to take action now

Form ID: 82649

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 82650

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Nothing chosen

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

But important to give consideration, in Stratford Upon Avon in particular, that the risk of poor infrastruture not being suficient to support a growing population may mean a reduction in visitors to stratford upon avon and therefore less available jobs in the town.

Form ID: 82651

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option E2a: Include a policy which encourages businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2b: Do not include a policy encouraging businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2c: Include a policy which looks to identify sites or development zones which are targeted at businesses wishing to be innovative towards a low carbon economy.

selected

Form ID: 82652

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-E11: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering South Warwickshire's economic needs

Q-E2: E2a. Yes with prioritisation for thiose who are more sustainable, but also E2c which mitigates E2b Q-E3: E3b is too restrictive, this should be left to an open market economy Q-E6: Agree with E6a but has to be a fluid policy on a case by case basis as the economic demands change Q-E9: Very hard one to answer and we may have a clearer view in the next round. Option E9a feels least restrictive at this pointand certainly taking a holsitic view of retail across the district can't be a bad thing. Q-E10: With regard to QE10, we disagree with the premise that tourism is unaffected by spatial planning. There are key issues to be addressed around infrastructure in and around areas of development that not only supports its residents but those visiting the area. The imapct that these developments and associated economic plans will have a direct impact on workforce that feed the tourism sector.

Form ID: 82653

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option E3a: Include a policy expanding on SDC's current existing policy.

selected

Option E3b: Have separate policies for individual sectors.

selected

Option E3c: Include a policy that secures employment strategies through S106.

selected

Option E3d: None of these

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.