Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership search

New search

Form ID: 82654

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option E4.1a: Include a policy supporting diversification

selected

Option E4.1b: Do not include a specific policy on diversification

selected

Option E4.2a: Include a policy supporting small-scale employment opportunities in rural areas

selected

Option E4.2b: Do not include a policy supporting small-scale employment opportunities in rural areas

selected

Form ID: 82655

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option E5a: Include a policy which supports a range of business units

selected

Option E5b: Do not include a policy in Part 1

selected

Form ID: 82656

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option E6a: Include a policy which protects South Warwickshire's economic assets.

selected

Option E6b: Do not include a policy protecting all these economic assets

selected

Form ID: 82657

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option E7.1a: Include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.1b: Do not include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.2a: Include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Option E7.2b: Do not include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Form ID: 82658

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-E8.1: Do you agree that the existing employment allocations, including the revisions to Atherstone Airfield, should be carried over into the SWLP?

Yes

Q-E8.2: If, no please list the sites that should be excluded and give reasons.

No answer given

Q-E8.3: Do you agree that proposals seeking the loss of a business, commercial or community building or facility should be subject to marketing, viability and alternative use tests?

Nothing chosen

Q-E8.4: Pease specify what you consider to be appropriate tests

Q-E8.3: Only where appropriate

Form ID: 82659

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option E9a: Identify retail areas on the policies map as well as Town Centre boundaries, within the Part 1 plan

selected

Option E9b: Save existing town centre and retail area boundaries in the Part 1 plan, and address this in Part 2

selected

Form ID: 82660

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-E10: Do you agree that Tourism should be addressed in Part 2 of the South Warwickshire Local Plan?

Yes

Form ID: 82661

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-H1-1: The HEDNA is proposing that we move away from an approach where future household needs are based on the 2014-based household projections towards a trend-based approach. Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of housing need across South Warwickshire?

Yes

Q-H1-2: If your answer to H1-1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future housing needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 82662

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-H2-1: What is the best way to significantly increase the supply of affordable housing across South Warwickshire?

In considering the options for Q-H2-2 we would suggest a hybrid option with a South Warwickshire wide requirment being set, and for that to then be divided between key areas of the district as required.

Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement

selected

Option H2-2b: Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts

selected

Option H2-2c: A more localised approach with separate affordable housing requirements for different localities across South Warwickshire

selected

Q-H2-3: How should South Warwickshire best address the specialist needs for older people?

We broadly support the suggestions in Chapter 6 of the Local Plan as to how this type of housing should be delivered, but a would alos note that nowhere in this section is "accessible and inlcusive" housing mentioned. The Local Plan could include a policy stance on the quanityt of accessible housing which should be provided (wheelchair accessible ad so forth), which may also overlaps with some of the needs for the older population.

Form ID: 82663

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Option H6a: Identify a range of specific sites in sustainable locations of up to 15 pitches/plots in size to be developed only for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes.

selected

Option H6b: Require large developments of over 500 homes to provide a proportion of Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes on the edge of the overall site.

selected

Option H6c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability.

selected

Q-H7: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering homes in South Warwickshire

Q-H2.2: A tricky one for the partnership to answer. At this stage optiont H2-2B feels most appropriate. First option is much too broad and third option could lead to clusturing of affordable housing in certain areas rather than creatin g wider inclusive society. Q-H5: the other options [H5a and H5b] are too prescriptive and could potentially result in them versus us developments

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.