Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Leamington Society search

Form ID: 73168

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 73169

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 73170

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

Make provision for rented accommodation in all developments. Infilling better than new settlements

Form ID: 75607

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-V3.1: Do you agree that the Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate?

Yes

Q-V3.2: If no, please indicate why

All these objectives are related and not enough attention has been paid to this

Form ID: 75615

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option I2a: Set out infrastructure requirements for all scales, types and location of development

selected

Option I2b: Focus on the strategic infrastructure relating specifically to the growth strategy

selected

Form ID: 75618

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

selected

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

selected

Form ID: 75624

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-I4.1: Should we include a policy to safeguard specific infrastructure schemes within the SWLP?

Don't know

Q-I4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about these specific safeguarding provisions

These proposals are too vague for me to comment properly.

Form ID: 75633

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

The local plan is based on dubious census and population estimates and until these are known with more confidence all estimates of infrastructure needs and viability are uncertain.

Form ID: 75637

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 75640

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S2a: Identify areas considered particularly suited to intensification development, and develop a design code for each character area. Have a policy supporting intensification within these identified areas where it complies with the relevant design code.

selected

Option S2b: Have a policy with 'in principle' support for intensification development, applicable across South Warwickshire; and develop design codes

selected

Option S2c: Do not have a policy which encourages intensification

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.