Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Leamington Society search

New search

Form ID: 75647

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

Brownfield sites should be developed as a priority with corresponding infrastructure even if this is more expensive.

Form ID: 75650

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 75662

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

Differences look marginal and within error boundaries - no clear difference is apparent to me.

Form ID: 75667

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 75671

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Don't know

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 75676

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 79214

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

This [growth of existing settlements] needs to be combined q=with improvements in public transport linking these settlements with nearby towns

Form ID: 80404

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

Transport is an important issue and suburban sprawl needs to be avoided - new settlements take up a lot of land and they are not making this any more.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.