Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
Representation ID: 103181
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
Green belt should be preserved as Green Belt and not used to develop new settlements or strategic growth locations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
Representation ID: 103194
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
Densification should be looked at on urban brown belt and in suitable existing main cities and towns excluding Warwick and South Leamington
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 9 - Using Brownfield Land for Development?
Representation ID: 103200
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
Brown field must be prioritised
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 103213
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
As stated brownfield Urban land in Coventry and West Midlands should be the focus and not South Warwickshire
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
Representation ID: 103232
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
The appropriate housing size mix based on need should be the focus. Not out of date statistics
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
Representation ID: 103240
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
Self build sites on small scale should be promoted
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
Representation ID: 103256
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
The statistics to show the need for 500 homes should be questioned. The need should be scrutinised and justified and kept on a scale of less than 5 homes per site
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-13-Core Opportunity Area?
Representation ID: 103290
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
The core opportunity area should not include the area south of Leamington
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 14- Major Investment Sites (MIS)?
Representation ID: 103333
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
Gaydon based on JLR/AML is already sufficiently developed. There should be no expansion at J 12 M40
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question F1
Representation ID: 103435
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
This site along the Fosse Way is not a suitable site for development. There is no railway station in the immediate area. The Fosse Way is a single carriageway road in an archaeological sensitive area. The land is prone to flooding and is low lying. The land is currently a mixture of agricultural, solar power provision and intensive herbiculture. It is not suitable for housing development
