Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Spitfire Bespoke Homes search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
Representation ID: 97461
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
the housing requirement should be increased in order to ensure affordable housing needs are met.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
Representation ID: 97463
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
no evidence has been presented that justifies all houses having to accord with NDSS.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
Representation ID: 97465
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
no clear evidence of need for 5% self build on large allocated sites.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
Representation ID: 97467
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
There is no credible evidence to support the Councils proposed approach to GTAA provision
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?
Representation ID: 97472
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
concerned whether the policy has been suitably viability tested.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- J- Reducing Flood Risk?
Representation ID: 97473
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
Draft Policy J largely reiterates the guidance contained in the NPPF and PPG on Flood Risk and the Sequential Test. It is unnecessary to repeat national policy in the SWLP. The SWLP should simply direct the reader to the NPPF and PPG.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
Representation ID: 97475
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
We support the design principles identified in Draft Policy Direction 25. However, it is noted that this is a “Policy Direction” that will be refined into a full draft policy in the Pre-Submission SWLP. It is, therefore, uncertain what the practical implications of the design principles will be at the present time. It is consequently difficult to comment further on the suitability or otherwise of a strategic design policy given the lack of detail and we reserve the right to comment on this at a later stage.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
Representation ID: 97478
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
Preparation of design codes have the potential to delay determination of planning applications which could impact on the supply of housing.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 97482
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
Draft Policy Direction 40 has the potential to add additional development costs that must be factored into a viability assessment produced with the Pre-Submission SWLP. In order for this Policy to be included in the Plan the Councils must have an understanding of the impact of this Policy on scheme density, the net to gross development ratio of schemes, and the overall scheme costs.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43c- Open Spaces?
Representation ID: 97484
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
The 400m distance threshold should be removed from the policy as there may be cases where this not practical. Where there is a need for open space to be provided off-site, the nature of that provision should be determined on the basis of the location of that site.
