Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Spitfire Bespoke Homes search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-44- Outdoor Sports and Leisure?
Representation ID: 97485
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
The Policy should provide clear guidance on the potential amount of open space and outdoor sports and leisure provision that will be expected with new developments.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-45- Areas of Restraint?
Representation ID: 97486
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
No. The areas of restraint are local landscape designations. There is no provision in the NPPF for the inclusion of local landscape designations in Local Plans. Paragraph 187a of the NPPF requires planning polices to protect and enhance “valued” landscapes only. The guidance in Section 15 of the NPPF is adequate to deal with local landscape matters.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-48- Protecting and Enhancing Landscape Character?
Representation ID: 97487
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
Landscape impact is just one of many matters that needs to be considered as part of the determination process. The draft wording of the policy Direction 48 would appear to elevate the importance of landscape harm beyond other considerations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
Representation ID: 98068
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
The site is free from constraints, available and deliverable and would make a contribution to the supply of housing in one of the District's smaller yet sustainable settlements.
