Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
Representation ID: 103533
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
It is recommended that the SWLP team should lead on the production of the settlement specific design codes (with inputs from Neighbourhood Planning Groups) and these should come forward at the same time as the SWLP with the focus on enabling housing delivery as soon as possible.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?
Representation ID: 103560
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 103572
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
Representation ID: 103591
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?
Representation ID: 103612
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough broadly support the approach within Draft Policy Direction 32, and note that Part S of the Building Regulations sets out the requirements for EV charging in new developments. Any EV Infrastructure Strategy should align with Building Regulations and national policy.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?
Representation ID: 103632
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?
Representation ID: 103646
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough supports Draft Policy Direction 35 in principle, specifically in relation to all new residential developments including appropriate wired and wireless infrastructure to provide high speed internet access. However, it is considered that sufficient flexibility should be built-in to the policy to allow for future changes and feasibility considerations.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 103660
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
Representation ID: 103673
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough support the preparation of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy (LNRS) (in line with the Environment Act 2021), and welcome the opportunity to review and comment on the LNRS once prepared.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?
Representation ID: 103688
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Richborough broadly support the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 38 in that it aligns with current national policy/legislation.
There is some concern regarding the reference to “or any higher percentage mandated through local or national policy/legislation” and it is considered that any proposal to increase the level of BNG beyond national policy should be tested as it may impact delivery and viability.
