Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-44- Outdoor Sports and Leisure?
Representation ID: 99335
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
This policy approach provides no certainty to a developer how much open space or contributions to outdoor sports and leisure facilities will be expected on any site.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-45- Areas of Restraint?
Representation ID: 99337
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
No. The areas of restraint are local landscape designations. There is no provision in the NPPF for the inclusion of local landscape designations in Local Plans. Paragraph 187a of the NPPF requires planning polices to protect and enhance “valued” landscapes only. The guidance in Section 15 of the NPPF is adequate to deal with local landscape matters.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-48- Protecting and Enhancing Landscape Character?
Representation ID: 99341
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
It would be entirely disproportionate for a LIVA to be submitted for the majority of schemes of this size.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 100725
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The plan period should be extended and we have concerns about housing delivery through a two part plan.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
Representation ID: 100730
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We have supplied a High Level Concept Plan for land west of Newbold Road, Wellesbourne.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 100741
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
the plan period should be extended and we have concerns about housing delivery with a two part plan.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 100746
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
Land east of Southam was promoted as a reserve housing site and should be a priority location for short term development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 100755
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
Vistry are concerned that these objectives may not be realised through the plan making process.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG12 Question
Representation ID: 100765
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We consider land to the east of Southam should be allocated for residential development and a new school.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
Representation ID: 100767
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The policy and its supporting text need to be amended in respect of the SM, uplifting of the requirement, lapse rates, existing commitments and the plan period.
