Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
Representation ID: 100775
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The HELAA constraint score of 38.5 for the site Ref ID 134 is inaccurately and unfairly derived from a flawed assessment and the total score should be lower, indicating a more favourable site.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
Representation ID: 100853
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We do not support the use of the term “small scale”. The SWLP Part 1 should support “proportionate” development within and adjacent to existing settlements.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
Representation ID: 100857
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We are concerned with the lack of detail and the refences within the draft Policy and the HEDNA is out of date.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
Representation ID: 100862
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The Councils should actively engage with site promotors to understand potential infrastructure opportunities and constraints in order to assist in establishing the most appropriate development sites and their policy requirements ahead of the publication of the Pre-Submission SWLP.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
Representation ID: 100869
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
There is no detail in the draft policy on the density levels that will be sought in any particular area or location. Density levels should be realistic and should consider net to gross ratios.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
Representation ID: 100875
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The housing requirement should be greater than the minimum Standard Method figure to help ensure that affordable housing requirements are met and we reserve the right to comment further.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
Representation ID: 100880
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We have concerns relating to the evidence base used to justify the NDDS requirements of Draft Policy A and further viability work needs to be completed.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
Representation ID: 100886
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We do not support the proposal that 5% of all plots on large housing sites are made available for custom and self-build homes. There is no evidence to suggest that there is this level of demand for self and custom-build plots in such large clusters or that that they will be deliverable.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
Representation ID: 100891
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
Whilst there is an identified need for further GTAA pitches there are a number of issues associated with requiring sites of 500 dwellings or more to provide gypsy and traveller sites.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?
Representation ID: 100896
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The Part A policy requirement needs to be viability tested in order to see if it is achievable. Sufficient grid capacity for battery storage will be required, which may not be available in all locations
