Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Kineton Parish Council search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?
Representation ID: 95232
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
suggest a retitling of this Policy to Smart Communities. The requirements within it should be applicable to all developments, rural and urban
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 95234
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Subject to the comments against specific DPDs being addressed
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-36 - Protection of Sites, Habitats and Species?
Representation ID: 95241
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
when finalising policy wording consider detailing how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced,
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
Representation ID: 95243
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
‘expected to support the principles’ gives an option to ignore the principles. Could the wording be amended to deliver an enforceable Policy?
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?
Representation ID: 95245
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
as drafted it is hard to agree the approach. The policy appears to give a developer the chance to over develop a site, prove that on-site mitigation is not achievable, and turn to an apparently un-monitored trading arrangement to “buy credits”. Furthermore those credits can be for theoretical locations nowhere near the site where the damage is being created. Local biodiversity is therefore irreparably damaged and unproven gain is claimed for unknown locations
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain?
Representation ID: 95246
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Broadly agree but not entirely. Comments as lodged against DPD38 apply.
It would be no consolation for the community living next door to the appalling pollution from the waste site in Staffordshire if the operators were able to buy permits for another totally different and remote location thereby being allowed to carry on depositing waste.
(This example has an alternative connotation now that the site operator has entered financial liquidation)
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 95248
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-41 - Carbon Sinks and Sequestration?
Representation ID: 95249
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-42-Trees, Hedges and Woodland?
Representation ID: 95252
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
is there scope for an actual target of canopy increase in the final wording?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43a- Local Green Space?
Representation ID: 95253
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
