Preferred Options 2025

Yes

Representation ID: 94988

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Should “major development” in first sentence be more specifically defined?
It the development cannot meet the targets what are the consequences which flow? Last sentence

Yes

Representation ID: 94989

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 94992

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Is there scope to go further? Depending on dwelling size could the rain water harvesting capacity be increased and used as a primary source of water for toilets?

Yes

Representation ID: 95000

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

"adequate water supply” should be measured by flow and pressure?
Policy should also deal with the ownership/responsibility for SuDS maintenance which has a long term impact on residents of and management companies for small and large developments (eg 8 - 100 dwellings)
Should developers warrant that where systems are not to be connected to the statutory authority’s infrastructure it will be constructed to a standard acceptable to that authority? i.e. do not allow developers to build inferior water and sewerage pipework throughout a development which could lead to major pollution issues in the medium to long term.

Yes

Representation ID: 95003

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Yes, but it must be enforceable. It can be envisaged that a new site for development could easily push a known surface water flooding problem onto the adjoining site – a problem that might not become apparent until a few years after completion i.e. after the developer has left the site and/or any commercial liability

Yes

Representation ID: 95008

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 95012

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Broadly yes but detailed comments should be taken into account.
The text for Draft Policy K appears to be incomplete.
There are long term concerns about SuDS, already mentioned but not yet addressed. This concerns long term responsibility for maintenance and liability where the scheme is part of public open spaces, usually including children’s play areas. Developers should be required to post a financial guarantee (bearing in mind they may have avoided significant capital outlay for Public Utility reinforcement) which can be drawn down in the future (regardless of the developer’s commercial and financial existence) for any major repair

Other

Representation ID: 95212

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

we have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment

Other

Representation ID: 95216

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Broadly yes but
the concept of the 20 minute neighbourhood has been described by some, including Officers associated with this Consultation, as access to necessary services by walking or cycling within 10 minutes. There is clearly a difference in timings for these very different modes of travel. Please specify without any ability for misinterpretation what this means. The DPD clearly says walking

Yes

Representation ID: 95218

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment