Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Kineton Parish Council search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
Representation ID: 94804
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Yes – but suggest that the requirement for a bedroom to be large enough for 2 occupants should be more carefully defined eg “room for 2 of 900mm single beds with space of Xmm beside and between each”
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
Representation ID: 94808
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no.
1 permits development outside a settlement boundary
2 enables unscrupulous developers to sell-on a site for market housing after 12 months by demonstrating no demand for self build.
Suggest that a developer should prove there is the demand and commitment for a specific site/location prior to putting in a planning application and that any consent falls away after 12 months if no building work has commenced in that time
3 carries no mechanism for proof that the self build will be occupied by the “self builder” or stipulate a minimum period of time that it must be so occupied
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
Representation ID: 94813
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
The proposal for transit provision needs clarification on matters such as criteria for locations suitable to deliver the services identified
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Delivering Homes that Meet the Needs of all our communities chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 94818
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
There is currently too much uncertainty in Policy, and/or Policy Direction wording in this section to be supportive
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-13-Core Opportunity Area?
Representation ID: 94844
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 14- Major Investment Sites (MIS)?
Representation ID: 94849
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
MIS. 1 appears elsewhere as SG13 for which comment has already been provided as follows:
The increase in the size of JLR land (currently used as a test track) would lead to access requirements from Lighthorne Road. This would be totally inappropriate given the road network within the centre of Kineton to the south, which cannot be altered. To the north the junction with The Fosseway is a location with frequent vehicle accidents and significant highway reconfiguration would be required. The Lighthorne Road is also narrow and, again, would require major widening
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-15- Provision of Office Accommodation and Refurbishment of Existing Office Stock?
Representation ID: 94864
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Supporting development that seeks to provide a substantial element of affordable office space is accepted BUT this must be within a BUAB.
Experience has shown that an approved application for office accommodation can subsequently be demonstrated as lacking demand and the application converted into residential. Attempts to breach Settlement Boundaries by offering "supported development of office accommodation" with subsequent variation must be avoided.
Similarly if the development takes place but not occupied Change of Use should not be permitted. The developer should revise tenancy type and/or charges
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-16-Airfields?
Representation ID: 94865
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-17- A Low carbon Economy?
Representation ID: 94867
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-18-Supporting Rural Employment and Diversification?
Representation ID: 94889
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
The wording in second bullet point seems to permit development outside of settlement boundaries if of an appropriate scale to location.
Supporting rural employment is accepted BUT this must be within a BUAB. Experience has shown that an approved application for business accommodation can subsequently be demonstrated as lacking demand and the application converted into residential. Attempts to breach Settlement Boundaries by offering rural employment accommodation with subsequent variation must be avoided. Similarly if the development takes place but not occupied Change of Use should not be permitted. The developer should revise tenancy type and/or charges
