Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Kineton Parish Council search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
Representation ID: 94777
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
Representation ID: 94782
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Reviewing and updating Settlement Boundaries MUST BE carried out in consultation with the Neighbourhood Development Plan holder
Sites adjacent to the BUAB would be permitted based on a threshold which is to “be determined” and linked to the Priority Area ranking. These criteria are far too weak and totally unacceptable. The Policy as drafted would encourage unwelcome, unwarranted developer-attention and totally weaken the rationale for Settlement Boundaries
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
Representation ID: 94783
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Possibly, but the order of delivery should release the reserve sites closest to the relevant conurbation first.
Eg to accommodate housing need from Coventry available sites nearest to Coventry should be released first irrespective of whether they are least favoured by developers. The Policy should not be used as an excuse by developers to pick up the “low hanging fruit”
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
Representation ID: 94787
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Broadly yes BUT “in certain circumstances” “where proven” “necessary and viable” are all far too weak for policy wording. These phrases appear in the text below the DPD box. Developers will use every opportunity to avoid delivering infrastructure ahead of development. Where infrastructure is appropriate it must be funded and delivered ahead of commencement of construction (and/or demolition). If necessary financial bonds should be provided by the developer
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
Representation ID: 94791
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Safeguarded land also needs to be included for the relief road around the west/north west of Kineton the need for which was proven in a Consultants’ report and given to WCC in 2019
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
Representation ID: 94793
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
Representation ID: 94795
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 9 - Using Brownfield Land for Development?
Representation ID: 94796
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 94799
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
broadly supportive ONLY IF specific comments offered above are accepted and supported.
How has Kineton been identified as a Priority 1 area for development? Is it because it is a MRC? The rationale for it not appearing under any significant category for housing or business development needs to be clarified, otherwise developers will use the classification as an excuse for imposing unwarranted/unjustified development. In later policy statements the reference to “edge of Priority 1” opportunities further reinforces our concern
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
Representation ID: 94800
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
Yes, but with the caveat that evidence needs to be gathered on housing needs of all residents, not just those needing affordable housing
