Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Biodiverse and Environmentally Resilient South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 101880
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Comments on Chapter 11 overall
There’s a lot of policies that seem to say the same thing but use different words. Is it possible to rationalise?
In light of the new NPPF and the government’s drive to build will some of these be seen as too restrictive during inspection?
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-48- Protecting and Enhancing Landscape Character?
Representation ID: 101881
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Reserve judgement
Unless major developments are required to have a full Landscape Visual Impact Assessment this is surely toothless
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 47- Special Landscape Areas?
Representation ID: 101882
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Object
Potential blocking tactic. We would support a study to identify particularly high quality areas that are considered suitable for designation as a Special Landscape Area and then assess whether this is legitimate within the revised NPPF
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-46- Protecting the Cotswold National Landscape?
Representation ID: 101886
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Buffer zones not needed, looks like a way of blocking developments
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-45- Areas of Restraint?
Representation ID: 101887
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
No opinion at this stage
A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint across South Warwickshire needs to be undertaken to help inform the designations before we can comment on the relevance of this suggestion
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-44- Outdoor Sports and Leisure?
Representation ID: 101888
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Policy Direction 43e Allotments, Orchards and Community Gardens?
Representation ID: 101889
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree with reservations
Orchards need careful maintenance to flourish. Who sets up, organises, pays for and monitors this work? A real danger of doing something that sounds nice but doesn’t work in practice
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43d-Urban Parks and Play Areas?
Representation ID: 101897
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Strongly agree
Really important that these should be onsite. The concept of MUGAs really important
The types of paths used should be fit for purpose and not loose gravel which washes away. Otherwise the urban parks and play areas are inaccessible.
See Warwick Gates paths which were recently replaced. Mallory Grange paths which are washing away and inaccessible for pushchairs/wheelchairs. Oakley Meadow paths which are washing away and inaccessible for pushchairs/wheelchairs.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43c- Open Spaces?
Representation ID: 101900
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Strongly agree
It is vitally important that open spaces will be provided in the first instance onsite within a development.
To echo our comments in 11.8.a, we note that Bishop’s Tachbrook Country Park and the desire, noted in the ‘made’ BTNDP to expand it to provide a buffer zone between Heathcote and BT village does not figure info the maps or descriptions in Section 4 of this draft plan. This is of utmost importance to the Parish Council.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43a- Local Green Space?
Representation ID: 101902
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
We welcome green spaces identified in NPs continuing to have protection.
However we note that Bishop’s Tachbrook Country Park and the desire, noted in the ‘made’ BTNDP to expand it to provide a buffer zone between Heathcote and BT village does not figure in the maps or descriptions in Section 4 of this draft plan. This is of utmost importance to the Parish Council.
