Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-42-Trees, Hedges and Woodland?
Representation ID: 101904
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Strongly in agreement. One hopes this is taken into account when selecting housing sites to be included in the SWLP
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-41 - Carbon Sinks and Sequestration?
Representation ID: 101905
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Policy not well enough described to comment at present
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 101906
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain?
Representation ID: 101907
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?
Representation ID: 101908
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
We strongly support exceeding the 10% Biodiversity Net Gain requirement to maximise ecological benefits. Biodiversity enhancements must be delivered near the original site to support local resilience and community well-being. The Anchitel Green development in Bishop’s Tachbrook highlights the risks of offsite mitigation, where biodiversity loss in the Parish was offset by gains in Stratford, creating an uneven distribution. In line with NPPF principles, biodiversity net gain should be secured where it is most needed—within or near the affected community—to maintain ecological balance and prevent biodiversity deserts.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
Representation ID: 101909
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-36 - Protection of Sites, Habitats and Species?
Representation ID: 101910
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree with reservations
Are there accepted definitions of what ‘locally important sites and assets’ are? If not the policy will be open to differing interpretations
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?
Representation ID: 101911
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-34-Vale of Evesham Control Zone?
Representation ID: 101913
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Can we have a Bishop’s Tachbrook HGV movement control zone like the Vale of Evesham?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?
Representation ID: 101914
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
