Publication Draft

Search representations

Results for A C Lloyd search

New search New search

Comment

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?

Representation ID: 33884

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

The requirement will be insufficient to cater for future demands. More flexibility is necessary in the process.

Comment

Publication Draft

Do you think the Council should adopt the Community Infrastructure Levy approach to securing developer contributions?

Representation ID: 33885

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

No, all development sites have individual constraints and opportunities. A standardized approach can often impede the best development solutions.

Comment

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Open Space?

Representation ID: 33886

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

The current approach to open space provision is unworkable.

Comment

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for Open Space?

Representation ID: 33887

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

The current approach to open space provision is unworkable.

Comment

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Natural Environment, particularly in respect of amendments to the Area of Restraint designation?

Representation ID: 33889

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

Land at South Sydenham is a legitimate peripheral development opportunity for inclusion in the Core Strategy. The Area of Restraint designation should be amended to accommodate the development.

Support

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for Sustainable Buildings, particularly in respect of higher targets for the reduction of carbon emissions?

Representation ID: 33890

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Flood Risk?

Representation ID: 33891

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for Flood Risk?

Representation ID: 33892

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Waste and Recycling?

Representation ID: 33893

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for Waste and Recycling?

Representation ID: 33894

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

Support

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.