Proposed Modifications January 2016
Search representations
Results for The Burman Family search
New searchSupport
Proposed Modifications January 2016
H53 - Hatton Park - Brownley Green Lane
Representation ID: 69061
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Support allocation of site H53
See attached
Support
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 16 - para 2.81
Representation ID: 70091
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Support release of site H53
If formally adopted, land can be brought forward immediately.
See attached
Support
Proposed Modifications January 2016
H28 - Hatton Park - north of Birmingham Road
Representation ID: 70092
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Support release of H28
See attached
Support
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 16 - para 2.81
Representation ID: 70093
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Support release of site H28 for housing
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 4 - Policy DS6
Representation ID: 70095
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Plan should span at least 15 years post-adoption. Given potential time to adoption, plan period should be extended to 2033
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 6 - Policy DS7
Representation ID: 70096
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Base end date of plan should change and numbers in table to DS7 will need to be changed
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 10 - Policy DS11
Representation ID: 70098
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Agree in principle with allocation of H28 for c120 dwellings.
Object to retention of strip of green belt land along eastern and northern edges of site.
No logical or defensible boundary as required by NPPF.
Should use field boundary.
No benefit in farming terms for keeping strips of land.
No justification in maintaining a landscape strip / buffer
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 11 - paras 2.41 to 2.53
Representation ID: 70099
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: The Burman Family
Agent: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Agree in principle with allocation of H28 for c120 dwellings.
Object to retention of strip of green belt land along eastern and northern edges of site.
No logical or defensible boundary as required by NPPF.
Should use field boundary.
No benefit in farming terms for keeping strips of land.
No justification in maintaining a landscape strip / buffer
See attached