Sylw

ID sylw: 97

Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr W C H Morris

While agreeing in principle the coucil previos and current actions to penalise local local shops and import large supermarket chains does not give me confidence that the town will not continue to die.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 106

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2009

Ymatebydd: R A Chapleo

Agreed - how could one disagree!

Sylw

ID sylw: 156

Derbyniwyd: 07/07/2009

Ymatebydd: G Ralph

I feel that you have ignored the need for better roads. As Leamington develops the links to other towns needs to be better for vehicles.

Sylw

ID sylw: 162

Derbyniwyd: 07/07/2009

Ymatebydd: mr John Wheatcroft

Lets sympathetically develop some of the rural villages around Leamington. This does not mean join them up to Leamington, heavens above no but just allow some relaxation of the rules regarding building in villages.

Cubbington for example is quite a good example of Old and New development, which is why we have "Cubbington" and "New Cubbington". It can be done and it can be done well.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 176

Derbyniwyd: 11/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Holmes

A well-crafted statement which balances employment and economy with community, environment and social issues.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 201

Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Baxter

The new houses should be built where it doesn't affect anyone else, i.e. a village of their own or by extending to Towns, not adding to already under-resourced villages.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 222

Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Duncan Hurwood

There's nothing to disagree with there, but it is full of rather vague statements. It is the details that have the problems.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 246

Derbyniwyd: 10/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Robinson

Point 5. The two main roads between Leamington and Warwick are very congested (Emscote and Myton Roads). They could not cope with additional traffic.
Point 9. Further development south of Leamington will spoil green spaces.

Sylw

ID sylw: 309

Derbyniwyd: 20/07/2009

Ymatebydd: B A Alston

Generally support the Preferred Vision. However, point 5 relating to transport within the district needs a lot of consideration and careful thought if the district is not to become "grid locked" at busy times

Sylw

ID sylw: 312

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Overall in agreement but there needs to be greater emphasis on the road infrastructure in and around Warwick.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 340

Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Pounds

No.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 403

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

The preferred vision is entirely suitable for Warwick District.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 417

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Clarke

You say you want to reduce the need to travel, but with 4200 houses north and south of Harbury Lane you will be putting at least 10,000 cars extra on an already gridlocked area and sufficient public transport would not be possible.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 468

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Georgina Wilson

Laudable - if a bit idealistic.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 525

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Stratton

Agree with the principles of the vision but am uncertain about the detail e.g. how new builds are only allowed if absolutely necessary and all exisitng housing is utilised/redeveloped, which retailers will be allowed to avoid yet more clone towns being created etc.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 538

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 600

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 658

Derbyniwyd: 06/08/2009

Ymatebydd: West Midlands RSL Planning Consortium

Asiant : Tetlow King Planning

We agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District. Targeting of individual sites for rural exception housing should also be developed within the Core Strategy

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 661

Derbyniwyd: 06/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Edkins

warwick should stay as is an historic town which encourages tourism in the area.Warwick should stay as it is with rural villages around it but not engulfed by larger conurbations e.g leamington and coventry.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 679

Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Smith

The usual airy-fairy waffle. The details of putting so much development go completely against the councils vision objective 1
"A mix of historic towns and villages set within an attractive rural landscape of open farmland and parklands, that have developed and grown in a way which has protected their individual characteristics and identities, contributed towards creating high quality safe environments with low levels of waste and pollution, and made a meaningful contribution to addressing the causes and potential impacts of climate change;"

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 691

Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009

Ymatebydd: P.A. Yarwood

No.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 762

Derbyniwyd: 05/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Faye Davis

Yes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 815

Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs I.E Rivers

Building so many houses on green belt land is contrary to the Council's own vision for Warwick District.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 831

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Adrian Farmer

The anticipated growth estimate seems excessive. This district has already seen huge growth in recent years and I would prefer to see other areas taking a greater share of the growth.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 889

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Rycroft

Whilst I like the sound of your overall vision I am concerned that in reality most people will have jobs that require a commute by car, meaning that if you simply ignore that fact and focus only on your ideal view of the world, then the whole district will suffer and actually become a worse place to live. If you cannot accommodate for the traffic as it is today how can you expect to cope with the extra 15-20,000 extra cars in the immediate area? Fix this First then look at the rest

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 894

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Christine Betts

Yes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 955

Derbyniwyd: 22/08/2009

Ymatebydd: E Keogh

I object to the development of the precious little green belt land that remains between Coventry and our neighbours in Warwickshire. It will have a negative impact on our unique communities, and the environment. There is no justification for this expansion which will put increased burden on already overstretched local infrastructures. I am also objecting on the basis that I believe WDC did not undertake the required consultation with interested parties under phase one, "The Preferred Vision".I am not aware of any direct public consultation with residents of Coventry with regards to proposed development on land adjacent to Finham, Coventry.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 960

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Kirit Marvania

Don't believe the level of growth is justified.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 976

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Yes.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1050

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Support