Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3507

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Owen

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3556

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Drew

Vision: Loss of village identity would contradict vision

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3596

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Sport England

We support the preffered vision

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3635

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

My concern is No 5 which does not differentiate between congestion in towns, eg Warwick and congestion in the wider highway network. The Vision needs to include specific provision for reducing congestion in towns. See supporting letter.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3655

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Keay

The use of prime green belt land for such a large amount of housing without employment opportunities is illogical.The proposed development in the King's Hill area will lead t increasing congestion and difficulty accessing the University area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3684

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

I agree with 1-4 and 8-10 which constitute a vision. Points 5-7 are secondary, a by-product of this Core Strategy. I live in a place that is renown for beauty, gentility, history and success - not by its transport connections or quality of housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3826

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

The vision is clumsy, not joined up and contradictory within the vision itself.
The vision must take into account what already exists and then enhance that. You either want 'an attractive rural landscape developed and grown in a way which has protected the individual characteristics' or you want 'a hub for successful and innovate hi-technology, manufacturing and research and development companies alongside a range of national and regional head offices and businesses' . The vision should be achievable and it should be developed in close consultation with the community. Careful examination of this vision shows it cannot deliver, it needs changing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3842

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman

I realise that Warwick District's Vision is trying to help people in the future, but why look at Coventry, Kings Hill, not at other ideas.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3899

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Kim Matthews

The vision assumes that population growth in the district is desirable or at least inevitable. The most sustainable development is to put housing near where the jobs are to minimise transport requirements. That means the strategy for the district should be to only allow housing growth where there are more jobs than homes and otherwise to reject the need for growth which should be fiocussed on the larger cities in eth region where employment is found (I have just moved to Kenilworth on the basis I can cycle to Stoneleigh Park to which my job has relocated).

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3967

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Trilogy

Asiant : Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

In particular, support the role of Leamington Spa as a strong sub-regional centre offering major stores alongside niche retailers in a high quality and safe environment.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3976

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

The plan does not have a full infrastructure plan, the area is already congested any further development (residential or business) will only make things worse.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4001

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Hard to disagree with wording, but amount and positioning of some of the development contradicts some of this - e.g.retaining separate identities of towns/villages.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4007

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I agree with the analysis of the potential in the Warwick district. I support the need to make use of all brown field sites/redevelopment of exisitng housing stock before building on green field sites.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4036

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Keith Turfrey

Greenbelt used to be an area that helped protect the environment and avoid unseemly development. use for leisure is permitted as has been the case in Kenilworth with well used facilities for rugby and cricket. To destroy the area proposed is totally contrary to the objectives set out in the opening section. It also takes seems to put no protection in for the conservation area known as Glasshouse Spinney.
This side of Kenilworth has already been overdeveloped leading to an out of balance town poor infrastructure and terrible road communication. Well done for proposing a strategy to make things worse.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4057

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Woodhouse

It is also important to keep the boundaries between Kenilworth and \coventry and to maintain Green Belt.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4125

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andy Robb

The vision is a disparate list of wishes which are not joined up. In total they would not enhance what already exists. You can either enhance an 'attractive rural landscape' or develop a 'hub for successful and innovative high technology, manufacturing and research and development'. Neither the vision or the strategies are clear on how this would be done.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4162

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth Heigl

Number of new homes contradicts vision.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4187

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

Not really sure

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4225

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

I do not agree with the preferred vision

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4251

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ashley Ball

I am in general agreement with the Preferred Vision.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4314

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Trevor E Wood

Object to:
Vision, strategy and strategic objectives are all poorly conceived and do not stand up to scrutiny.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4342

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Clive Letchford

Proposed development south of Leamington contradicts vision

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4347

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A Picken

The land at Thickthorn is green belt- not green field, developing this area would increase existing peak hour traffic problems. Kenilworth is a dormer town - employment land not be considered.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4351

Derbyniwyd: 25/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Dominic Simpson

Expanding Leamington through Whitnash and enveloping villages opposes vision and goes against recent poll which suggested significantly fewer new homes were needed.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4366

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Kirby

Contradicts vision of 'mix of historic towns and villages set within a rural landscape of open farmland and parklands'.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4397

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrew, Julie, Eleanor, Henry Day

New building will change character of village. No longer mix of historic towns and villages set in rural landscape of open farmland and parks as website states if development goes ahead.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4405

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.L.K. Drew

Bishops Tachbrook will feel less of a village, reducing quality of life for residents and at Warwick Gates and Whitnash. How does this square with the vision when it will destroy open farmland and obliterate one of the valued villages?

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4505

Derbyniwyd: 29/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4576

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

support

Sylw

ID sylw: 4645

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

The vision sounds 'wonderful' but is it achievable in order to maintain character green spaces and green belt must be protected, building more homes and infrastructure may erode 'green'