Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2279

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2380

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

No.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2417

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

No.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2483

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: British Waterways

BW is pleased to see the canal corridor mentioned within the vision. BW would welcome a move away from the green space reference to reflect its use as a multifunctional asset including sustainable transport, healthy living, recreation and tourism, setting for marina, residential and commercial development, flood and water management, heating and cooling energy management, ecology and historic sense of place.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2518

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2544

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

The area has developed naturally and retained its individual character. This proposed expansion of the district would further exacerbate the imbalance between homes and jobs. Until the existing retail premises can attract interest other than charity organizations no further premises required.

Sylw

ID sylw: 2592

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard Storey

I find the "Preferred Vision and Strategy" so unrealistic in the early stages of a deep recession, with a change of government and central policy by mid 2010, that I am unable to comment in detail on most issues.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2603

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Everthing appears to be covered.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2663

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2726

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

But I would prefer Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash to be viewed as separate towns and in no way merged into on urban area. I would prefer the South of Coventry to be included as a growth area.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2780

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

A limited yes. We are advised to conserver our wildlife and its natural habitat but houses are being built all over England unecessarily.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2822

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2861

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2903

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD

AS USUAL YOU HAVEN'T THOUGHT THINGS THROUGH AND ARE GOING FOR QUICK FIX SOLUTIONS AND DAMN THE LONGTERM RAMIFICATIONS.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2918

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Yes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2965

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Have said no though we partially agree

Sylw

ID sylw: 3022

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rhyan Barry

I agree with the vision per se but do not think the vision should involve building on green belt. Also public transport is not reliable or convenient and (with having to pay car parking costs at train stations) not cheap. Cycle routes, although some have recently appeared, seem to be built in a half-hearted way. In the Netherlands, bicycles have their own traffic lights and the routes are safe and continuous. I would not feel happy taking my children to Warwick on the new route from Kenilworth as it comes to a stop at the outskirts of the town.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3038

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katharine Whigham

I agree - the areas I belive are of particular importance are:

green spaces
good transport links
developing the centre of rural excellence at Stoneleigh Park

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3068

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

There is too great a concentration of proposed development to the south of Warwick/ Leamington Spa - 4200 houses 39%

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3132

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

With exception of any industrial development.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3137

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3191

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3214

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mrs stella moore

Seems to be balanced and look at providing jobs tourism and housing

Sylw

ID sylw: 3248

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Julian Humphreys

All sounds very nice and says the right things, not clear how all of these will be achieved when you read what plans are in store

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3251

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

Warwick District is over crowded with traffic now. The preferred vision would only make it worse.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3335

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3377

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Support

Sylw

ID sylw: 3434

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Gill and Steve Hawkins

Development is contrary to vision of mix of historic towns and villages set within an attractive rural landscape

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3435

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3468

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby

I do not think that the Kings Hill area should be included in the Warwick's 'vision' as it comes under the Coventry allocation.