BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1054
Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Pamela Beedham
Provided housing does not erode the Green Belt to a significant amount.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1121
Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Alice Jarrett
Support.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1161
Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Barry Elliman
Support
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1215
Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrew Horsley
No-
Point 1 - Housing development would threaten " characteristics & identity" of my community - preferred option contradicts this.
Point 4 - Motor industry has declined-
Point 7- Education facilities stretched to breaking point & no room for primary children in local schools. Preferred option contradicts this
Point 10- Building in agricultural land contradicts this.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1223
Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009
Ymatebydd: MS Judith Bennett
I object to the use of green belt land along the boarder with Coventry. I cannot understand the need for the development of this land where is the proof that there is need for this level of development? The damage to the environment and to wildlife will be emense and unjustifiable.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1264
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Margrave
The vision is Warwick, Leamington & Kenilworth centric.
There is no mention of how Whitnash fits into this plan. The Trident Centre may seem to be in Whitnash, but only it's car park is in Whitnash.
What is the preferred vision for Whitnash? To merge into Warwick, Leamington & Bishops Tachbrook as single urban sprawl?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1281
Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Sarah Jane Horsley
No
Point 1 Character of Whitnash is under threat from more housing.
Point 4 No more manufacturing/ reduced manufacturing.
Point 7 Schools overcrowded so local children havinig problems getting into local schools. This goes against the Preferred option.
Point 10 Building on agricultural land is against this point.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1352
Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Asiant : DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Too much emphasis placed on conservation and protection rather promoting the authority as a fous of housing growth and employment.
Too much emphasis should not be placed on th protection of the Leamington conservation area, so that it stifles developement as noted in PPG15 para 4.16.
A balance should be struck between protection and compliance with WMRSS policies which directs growth outside MUAs towards town such as Leamington and Warwick. Feel that Leamington should be a priority for development.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1408
Derbyniwyd: 20/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Kevin and Sylvia Burke
Nifer y bobl: 2
The development south of Harbury Lane would go against the Council's original vision of a mix of historic towns in a rural landscape.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1418
Derbyniwyd: 26/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs N&M Woods
Nifer y bobl: 2
Contradicts itself in proposing housing development on land south of Harbury Lane and Whitnash.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1471
Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Kundi
Nifer y bobl: 2
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1503
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Hamilton
Some reservations with the vision
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1535
Derbyniwyd: 29/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Roberts
Agree - vision should be one of historic towns and viollages set in open farmland and coutryside.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1549
Derbyniwyd: 31/08/2009
Ymatebydd: B.L.A.S.T.
3b The vision needs to encompass the country's future needs for self-sufficiency and food production with in particular the ratio of garden land, including allotments, to house building being greater in favour of growing land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1592
Derbyniwyd: 30/08/2009
Ymatebydd: EUNICE NICOLSON
I strongly object to the proposal to build on green belt land at King's Hill.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1600
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: William Bethell
No. Little if any vision on the impact of the existing Leamington/Warwick District residents in terms of quality of life.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1615
Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrew Cowden
The proposed development of housing south of Harbury Lane goes against the Council's own vision "mix of towns within an attractive rural landscape".
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1665
Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009
Ymatebydd: J.G Whetstone
South Leamington has seen maximum housing development in recent years and should not form part of any future development.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1675
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni
For tourism development, it is important that the area is protected and meets the vision for Warwick.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1773
Derbyniwyd: 20/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Max Bacon
Object.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1798
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1800
Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Cheatham
Warwick cannot sustain any additional traffic. Already considerable congestion.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1921
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Ferguson
Without the infrastructure it will be a disaster - the Shires retail is already jammed on weekends and the tip is already full at peak times.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1972
Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Ken Hope
(3.a) No real comment - it's very 'nice'
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1985
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: K A Ferguson
The amount of new housing proposed contradicts the vision that Warwick District Council has " providing a mix of historic towns and villages set within a rural landscape of open farmland and parks".
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1998
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A. J Daubnley
The amount of new housing proposed contradicts the vision that Warwick District Council has " providing a mix of historic towns and villages set within a rural landscape of open farmland and parks".
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2011
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: The Occupier
The amount of new housing proposed contradicts the vision that Warwick District Council has " providing a mix of historic towns and villages set within a rural landscape of open farmland and parks".
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2031
Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009
Ymatebydd: mr john jacques
because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2065
Derbyniwyd: 05/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Kerr
I agree with the 'preferred Vision' as stated on page 16 and in particular item 9.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2132
Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles
Para 1 - vital to continue to protect individual characteristics of towns and villages. Large growth will destroy this.