Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4910

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joyce A Green

Object to Kings Hill site:
Sceptical as to need for 33,500 new homes in Coventry. Should not be buidling to allow for increased immigration. Concerns for lost generation of school leavers, currently not earning or learning new skills. Perhaps birth rates will fall in future.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4922

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: L Hughes

Object to Thickthorn site:
Most statistical evidence collected prior to current fiscal catastrophe and should projections now be made, convinced different set of conclusions would be identified. Core Strategy therefore will be dated and irrelevant.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4937

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Sukhjeet and Uinkar Dhillon

Object to sites in Harbury Lane and Whitnash area:
Why have council not challenged figures?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4970

Derbyniwyd: 08/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Harrison

OBJECT-To the principle of 'parachuting' an arbitary distribution of additional housing into the planning system at critically late stage. If the extra housing is needed, then it should be planned properly through the RSS.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5057

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Morris

The problem is - how is the growth calculated.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5080

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Dr Neville Hunt

Object to Kings Hill site:
Scale of development is breathtaking. Currently only 2,000 homes in Finham, increase of 3,500 would dominate the area, swamp its infrastructure and ruin its semi-rural tranquility. Smaller scale on edges of identified site less contentious. In particular Kings Hill itself is prominent and cherished local landmark not without historical significance and idea of capping with modern housing visible from miles away, unthinkable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5088

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: James Pinkerton

Object to sites south of Leamington:
Why are houses proposed to be built where needs survey has identified need for 10's not 1000's?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5140

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs ME Shaw

Object to sites south of Warwick, Whitnash and Leamington:
No evidence for vast numbers of new houses talked about.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5151

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts

We already have two major cities on the Warwick doorstep, both of which exhibit large social and economic problems, I'm assuming the target is to aspire to these glorious examples of town planning! Enough is enough.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5220

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Sonia Owczarek

There is no need for this level of housing to be built.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5248

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood

Far too high

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5273

Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr A Emerson

Object to Kings Hill site:
Do not wish to see green belt/farmland destroyed in favour of housing that is not required but is being forced upon us by MPs.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5290

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: J. N. Price

The figures quoted in clauses 10.42 et seq do not appear to have any justification and consideration of levels of housing growth higher than those in the 'Preferred Options' paper would only bean unnecessary distraction from the present process and is therefore not justified

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5350

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: SEAN DEELY

There is no tangible justification even for the 10,800 requirement

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5402

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Baxter

No it is not necessary

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5442

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mike Cheeseman

I object here largely because it is a whole new subject and should go through the same processes as the Core Strategy

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5480

Derbyniwyd: 27/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Illingworth

Strongly agree with the Preferred Option's resistance to the WMGO/Nathaniel Lichfield's absurb figures for housing growth

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5534

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Nifer y bobl: 2

We will already lose significant green belt land which makes a mockery of the term 'greenbelt' which in my book is a useless term anymore. We cannot allow more growth even now we should not allow it to happen. Best way is to develop another Milton Keynes and have a brand new town developed to hit the targets. What happens when the UK populeation hits 200 Million in the year 2200? When will it stop and where will everyone come from.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5579

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: George Martin

I would support only if the 'Growth is within environmental limits' and if it adds no net gain to the carbon footprint of WDC.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5608

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Duncan Gowing

Object to Kings Hill site:
Overspill from Coventry due to ludicrously high number of houses they are planning.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5665

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Jane Boynton

I am still unconvinced about the real level of demand for housing which is anticipated by the government in requiring WDC to submit this Core Strategy .

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5711

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roger Warren

I strongly support the Council's opposition to the Government's 20,800 houses: It is indeed inappropriate and impossible to accommodate.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5738

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Rycroft

Object to
Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash
Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane
Land west of Europa Way, Warwick
Figures are incorrect and based on previous levels of migration when we are supposed to be getting less migration than before according to RSS. Why still forcing this number of houses upon us? Warwick only needs in the order of 4000 houses based on organic growth rate over 30 years rather than 5 years when irregular growth spurt due to frantic building. No additional housing needed either south of Warwick and Leamington or around Kenilworth or elsewhere in the district other than on brownfield sites.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5774

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Philip Wilson

Housing growth should not be linked to unrealistic housing quotas imposed from Whitehall.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5798

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: PG Swann

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5819

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Cox

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5857

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Pamela Payne

Already building too many houses. Why do we have to have some of Coventry's as well?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5925

Derbyniwyd: 05/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Angain any housing growth would lead to more traffic congestion. Get a council officer to stand on the rounabout at the Gallows Hill and Europa Way and another councillor to stand at the bottom of Gallows Hill where it meets the Banbury Road between 7.30 Am and 10.00am. It is the same in the evening when people are going home from work. Then imagine work people trying to get onto Europa Way from an estate on the west side of Europa Way.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5931

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Roberts

Housing figure supply should relate to the needs and the ability of an area to accommodate the development.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6006

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Harris

Object.