Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2942

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

STRONGLY OBJECT - This area has a relatively poor supporting infrastructure, other than good motorway access, and it is our belief that the numbers already imposed/accepted are significantly in excess of local needs and are too accommodating of outflow from Birmingham, Coventry and other areas.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2962

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs. penny Spooner

there are limits to what the infrastructure will stand

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2993

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Less not more

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3051

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katharine Whigham

The proposals are already for a high level of additionla housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3065

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Alison Oliver

There will be more than enough housing under the current proposed strategy

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3097

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

The levels of proposed housing growth are far too high, particularly for the areas south of Whitnash, Leamington Spa and Warwick.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3124

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mel Gillman

Object. The levels in the preferred option are already far too high.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3171

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3175

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

STRONGLY OBJECT - This area has a relatively poor supporting infrastructure (compared to most other areas of the country - why is this the case? We are constantly surprised as we travel about on how much better other, apperently less wealthy areas cope!), other than good motorway access, and it is our belief that the numbers already imposed/accepted are significantly in excess of local needs and are too accommodating of outflow from Birmingham, Coventry and other areas.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3281

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

As 10d.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3330

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3371

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3405

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3482

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby

Object

Sylw

ID sylw: 3549

Derbyniwyd: 02/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Chris and Pauline Vaughan

Enough housing built over last 15 years. No need for more - who will buy?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3572

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Owen

object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3629

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Donald Gregson

Council has not challenged housing requirement based on alleged flawed data.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3634

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Dominic Simpson

Fewer homes will result in lower population increase leading to area of rich heritage with attractive green spaces and strong agricultural economy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3675

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Keay

object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3712

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

I think that 10,800 over the period 2011-26 is too much already. The figures relating to housing demand arising from local poulation growth are erroneous - if the houses at Warwick Gates, Hatton Park, SW Warwick had not been built in the last fifteen years, the population wouldn't have grown as much! Which came first - chicken or egg?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3736

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: D S Edwicker

Housing figures not justified by employment and business needs.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3744

Derbyniwyd: 13/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Alan N Gandy

Horror at vast numbers of houses proposed. Do not need or desire development on this scale. Unclear who is to be accommodated.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3749

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Objection detailed in letter above

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3831

Derbyniwyd: 17/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Philip and Barbara Lennon

Council has doubled amount of green field land needed between May 08 and 09 Why? How do current and shadow MPs react to this when contrary to govt. recommendation for brown field/green field devt. proportions? Agree some housing needed in future for elderly independent housing, sheltered housing, single person, family and low cost private and rented accommodation. Survey needed across the district to disprove govt. figs based on NLP report. Legally challenge govt. figs.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3850

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Paul and Caroline Whitwood

Top down approach to housing figs. unappropriate and flawed. Should be based on local need.
Why 4000 houses proposed in vicinity of Bishops Tachbrook when 15 housing need?
Re-evaluate calculations based on local population, available employment and hence population growth.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3880

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman

Yes - Far too many

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3907

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

I am quite sure you will happily listen to these objections to this higher level of housing growth. You must not do this in isolation.
Look at the arguments you put forward for these addtional 5000 homes and put forward the same argument for putting 4000 homes in the same place. Stop contradicting yourself and listen to your customers - us. There should be NO large housing developments at all anywhere. Distribute them and create smaller developments of 200 houses or less.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3963

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr John Archer

I do not believe it would be appropriate to pursue higher levels of housing. There are considerable uncertainties in the market, both in relation to finacial support for greater housing delivery and the difficulties that the house builders would have in achieveing even higher annual totals. Given such uncertainties it is far better to look to provide for the level sof growth that are proposed, which will at the very least go some considerable way towards longer term need, and monitor and review at a later period.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3989

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

Just read the adverse impact in the strategy, The strategy lacks any mention of suitable infrastructure to support this growth ie roads, services(water, sewerage, power) No mention of any new schools or expansion to the existing schools, children in Warwick gates do not live within walking distance of catchment schools so this increases congestion on the roads.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4059

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Keith Turfrey

The Govt proposed levels are excessive and it seems this is recognised here. Even then the levels could still be seen as excessive. Generally houses at the smaller end of the market are seen to be far smaller than the continental average and proposing high densities of build ends up with unsatisfactory housing conditions and is a backward step in a developed nation.