Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1383

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Asiant : DNS Planning and Design Consultants

There should be greater levels of housing growth in the district than proposed in the Preferred Options.

The Council has identified a target of 10,800 homes within the plan period. This was originally 11, 300 by the GOWM but was reduced by 500. We argue the figure should be 11,300 as originally proposed by regional government.

The Council include 1, 125 homes with p/p which may or may not be built. We argue a slippage figures of 10% will not come forward because of the recession.

The Council have included a 2,100 windfall allowance but where is the evidence these are available and achievable? They may not all be so (estimated 20%)

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1522

Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Strongly object to any additional housing above the 8000 units.

The West Midlands has many areas of steep population decline from the main urban areas such as Stoke, Birmingham and the Black Country, with huge areas of brown field sites; these would be a much more logical places to build.

Over development of the WDC historic towns will destroy their character and remove their essence which their economy and desirability is based upon.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1541

Derbyniwyd: 29/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Roberts

Same reasons thatt he council objects. Need to ensure that towns/ villages do not jlooin into an urban jungle and we should protect green belt around the area to avoid undermining the warwick districty core values of rural living.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1648

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: William Bethell

How can we justify any further use of urban greenfield sites. Quality of life is the prime objective, surely.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1700

Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009

Ymatebydd: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1744

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1772

Derbyniwyd: 20/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Max Bacon

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1843

Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Val Hunnisett

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1882

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Silly question

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1948

Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Ferguson

8000 is already too many.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1981

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ken Hope

(10.f) There is no immediate demand for higher levels of growth and many things might have changed before the need arises so decisions made now would be on the wrong basis. They should be left for now.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2057

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mr john jacques

because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2102

Derbyniwyd: 06/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Nick Booker

I object because of:

significant loss of Green Belt land;
the coalescence of the urban areas between eg Kenilworth and Coventry;
development within areas of high landscape value, with potential significant adverse impacts on Historic Parks and Gardens, areas of ecological importance and ancient woodlands;
significant infrastructure works, particularly in relation to roads including major highway alterations to the M40 and A46 junctions, and the road network through eg Kenilworth

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2192

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

The building of any further large housing development within the District is strongly objected to. The existing character of our towns and villages is seriously damaged by such large scale building.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2247

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter and Anne Wing

Nifer y bobl: 2

* The findings of the Lichfield report are ridiculous and if the number of new houses has been in any way based on this then it reinforces the point that the demand for houses should be reassessed.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2330

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2407

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

No.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2445

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2537

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Cugini

there is not the infrastructure to support another development, there are no more school places, inadequate public transport and gridlocked roads. Do not ruin the area more than it has already been by a constant stream of building which is unneccessary and unwanted by local residents.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2538

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Cugini

not needed, area does not have infrastructure to support more houses

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2562

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

We consider the current proposals to represent a gross over expansion to the district and would object most vehemently to any further expansion.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2632

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2637

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr James Delaney

Preferred Options already excessive development proposed for the area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2673

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jennifer Maisey

Completely and strongly object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2691

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Parallel to any new developments far more pressure should be put on house or brownfield land owners to restore or develop such a properly. The housing stock is generally good but there are still places in poor repair.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2755

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

There is no need to build at a higher rate than proposed in the Preferred Options. It will destroy urban and rural locations and erode the spaces between them. It assumes there will be demand which may not materialise in the current economic climate.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2799

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

This cannot be considered.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2843

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2882

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2911

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD

IF WE STOPPED IMMIGRATION THE POPULATION NUMBERS WOULD EVEN OUT, WHY SHOULD WE PAVE OVER OUR ENTIRE COUNTRY BECAUSE THE POLITICIANS ARE TERRIFIED OF BEING LABELLED RACISTS. WAKE UP, IT'S ABOUT SPACE, NOT RACE.