Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 134

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2009

Ymatebydd: R A Chapleo

Object to higher levels of housing growth

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 152

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2009

Ymatebydd: R Clipson

I STRONGLY OBJECT to the level of housing proposed by the regional/national authorities and sited in the Nathanial Litchfield report.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 175

Derbyniwyd: 11/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David Jordan

Don't just fill in every bit of green space with housing. Build affordable homes to satisfy the demands there are plenty of unaffordable homes already for sale.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 200

Derbyniwyd: 12/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoffrey Field

I object to the higher levels of housing growth based on the finding of a single, outside reseach body. Any research into local housing need must be conducted by WDC to have any credibility.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 235

Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Duncan Hurwood

Completely object. It's a terrible idea.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 275

Derbyniwyd: 10/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Robinson

Over-developed an not inkeeping with the local area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 305

Derbyniwyd: 17/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David Higgin

There are already over 1000 properties available in the area for both sale and rent, all I support is a reduction in the levels of housing planned

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 339

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

I strongly objesct to the levels proposed.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 369

Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Pounds

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 413

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

Warwick District does not possess the infrastructure or space to accommodate higher levels of housing. Furthermore, the case put forward by NLP and GOWM is unproven

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 445

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Clarke

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 497

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Georgina Wilson

I am sceptiacal anyway about the figures which have been recently revised. If we build more homes will that just encourage more people in Warwickshire then commute to e.g. Coventry.
Note: - Housing on the Potterton site in Warwick remains mainly empty.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 535

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Stratton

I support the statement that The Council does not therefore support higher levels of housing growth as suggested by the Government Office for the West Midlands

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 536

Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Abbie Rae

I object to this.

Building on greenbelt by the edge of coventry is just bonkers.

There isn't the road system to jusify the use, plus you will lose all that lovely green space, Extra cars will cause even more enviromental issues.

Why can't you just leave it alone. look at what you have and rejuvenate,

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 568

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 631

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 678

Derbyniwyd: 07/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Anna Sampson

More housing will go into green belt and put strain on the town. Areas of Coventry need to be looked at for regeneration.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 720

Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009

Ymatebydd: P.A. Yarwood

Object.

Sylw

ID sylw: 750

Derbyniwyd: 06/08/2009

Ymatebydd: West Midlands RSL Planning Consortium

Asiant : Tetlow King Planning

PPS3 states that Local Planning Authorities should also take into account potential housing growth scenarios and how these may be accommodated within the District. It is important therefore that Warwick District Council presents a strategy for accommodating the proposed housing figures as these may yet be imposed by the RSS.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 791

Derbyniwyd: 05/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Faye Davis

From evidence presented to me at local housing meetings I believe the growth currently proposed is too high.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 859

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Adrian Farmer

Already object to numbers in 'preferred options'

Sylw

ID sylw: 888

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mining Remediation Authority

If higher levels of growth are imposed following the RSS examination,this may necessitate the further consideration of housing development on sites which have been excluded from the PO.In the event that it becomes necessary to consider housing development within the deep coal resource area the mining position of any potential development sites would need to be given due consideration in order that any stability/public safety issues are identified and addressed.This would be particularly relevant if the currently excluded SHLAA sites in the Burton Green area were to be re-considered for development as a result of any increase in housing requirement

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 923

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Christine Betts

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1004

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Strongly Object!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1028

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Kirit Marvania

Believe levels proposed are too high.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1091

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Strongly object. Where are the jobs to sustain this number of houses? It would ruin Warwickshire for a tourist attraction.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1129

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

The figure of 10,800 is already far more than we shoudl be building.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1191

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Barry Elliman

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1249

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrew Horsley

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1316

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Sarah Jane Horsley

Object