Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4072

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I strongly object to higher levels of housing growth being suggested by Govt and support WDC stand against this.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4082

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Yes - much too high.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4104

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Woodhouse

yes I certainly do object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4161

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth Heigl

Recent housing needs survey shows only 15 houses required in Bishops Tachbrook.
4200 houses between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates threatens existence of Bishops Tachbrook as village. Some housing may be needed but this should be based on local need from bottom up, not top down from govt. and not the numbers suggested.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4186

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

I also object to the level of housing growth specified in the preferred options is far too high for local needs, and the numbers of additional houses should be significantly reduced. Why is it OK for Bishops Tachcbrook to join the conurbation and not for example, Milverton?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4267

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kulwinder Fathers

The level of housing growth specified in the preferred options is far too high for local needs, and the numbers of additional houses should be significantly reduced.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4293

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Miles

Look for brown field sites instead
Challenge number of homes required

Sylw

ID sylw: 4297

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heather Cooper

Any new development should be employment led - why build new houses in area of high unemployment? Where would these people go to work?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4306

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: E V Wade

Object to Kings Hill site:
Not enough information to justify why extra housing required.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4318

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Trevor E Wood

No explanation as to why houses and employment needed. Process based on statisitcs known to be flawed and change daily.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4322

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter and Olive Kerr

No supporting evidence for a revised figure of 9,500 new homes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4334

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Janette Eslick

Wish to see plan withdrawn and alternative presented reflecting public opinion.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4365

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Kirby

Bishop's Tachbrook housing need is for 15 houses, not 4,200
4,200 houses on strip of land between Warwick Gates, Whitnash & Bishop's Tachbrook to everyones detriment because it will virtually join communities.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4376

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A Picken

The current housing growth proposal would create numerous problems-Traffic Environmental, Infrastructure etc, Higher growth proposals would be a disaster.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4386

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Daniel & Elizabeth Sheethan

Object to positioning and quantity of housing

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4391

Derbyniwyd: 26/08/2009

Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner

Need - based on acceptance that another 4200 needed in this area. Survey identified need for 15 new homes in Bishops Itchington - if not justified, what is being done to resist it.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4441

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford

Not acceptable - damaging impact on district.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4478

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Brian Hier

Object to site at Kings Hill:
Housing predictions are at best, educated guesses. Local govt. then expected to toe the line and look for possible sites. Quality being sacrificed for achieving numbers dicatated by distant govt. Decisions should be made by those living and working in an area.
Brown field should be developed first and needs careful monitoring to ensure that full capacity is achieved before green belt land considered.
Green fields between Coventry and Kenilworth is essential to quality of life of both communities.
Currently used for crops and livestock as well as habitat to wildlife, which is disappearing elsewhere.
In current economic climate, govt. putting 'cart before the horse'. People need employment to earn money to buy homes. Who will be living in new homes? Until resurgence in the economy, picture is unclear - another reason for more measured approach to housing development.
Need for detailed survey of infrastructure.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4492

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Declan Mee

Object to Kings Hill site:
Lack of demonstrable need for new dwellings when we are in downturn with no signs of jobs returning to Coventry area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4547

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Loss of Greenbelt, willages melding with towns andl losing identity. Narrowing Coventry - Kenilworth Gap

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4607

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

Nor should Coventry overspill be accommodated.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4612

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Verrier

10,800 new homes seems to be a govt. figure plucked out of thin air with no thought for where and without the necessary economic support with local industry and for infrastructure.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4712

Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

Levels of housing at present are projected figures only. Housing in Warwick District has already increased, now we are supposed to have more - when will it end?
At presen, sadly on some estates where mix of housing and affordable housing are built I believe (hopefully I am wrong) that there have been social problems for residents, ie Warwick Gates. WDC do appear to have best interests of residents at work, do not buckle.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4754

Derbyniwyd: 02/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr Bob Dhillon and family

Object to building houses south of Warwick:
In South West and South East and East there have been legal challenges (to RSS), are you planning such an action to West Midlands strategy?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4762

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs John & Margaret Pyner

Object to Kings Hill site:
Unhealthy, unbalanced allocation of majority of housing to Coventry conurbation, compared to Warwick and Solihull areas.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4774

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: K Dorning

Residents need to know how the housing figures were arrived at.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4813

Derbyniwyd: 18/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Ian Frost

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4816

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Nigel Warden

Disagree with Coventry City Council's Core Strategy decision to opt for hugely disproportionate amount of housing as part of govts. plans to solve housing need.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4834

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke

No Proven requirement.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4879

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke

WDC should urgently carry out it's own housing needs survey based on the current population. This would be the basis for negotiating realistic housing numbers with government.