BASE HEADER
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3328
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3404
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3464
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro
All homes should be low cost
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3479
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby
Object
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3571
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Owen
object
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3710
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes
Supported.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3877
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman
Finham has many larger houses, so why spoil it with other typed houses.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3906
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins
Considering the SHLAA panel is comprised mainly of affordable housing developers it seems inappropriate that they can comment on what is in fact their own proposal - see those in support!
Additionally the criteria for these figures of the costs of building affordable housing has to be questioned with recent ways of creating affordable housing being demonstrated recently. Perhaps you should look at ALL types of affordable housing and include some of the public and design experts when considering these options. This is a poor attempt at explaining how to provide affordable housing.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3988
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba
The council should be investing in more council housing
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4063
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood
Support this preferred option
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4077
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke
Yes
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4121
Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Colin Sharp
40% affordable/social housing ludicrous - not economically viable especially when developers expected to fund infrastructure.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4176
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Rural Community Council
WRCC is fully commited the provision of affordable housing but is concerned that an insistence on a minimum of 50% affordable in all developments may make them uneconomic for the developer.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4185
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann
Only as long as they are spread evenly throughout the district. I do object to large housing estates.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4257
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford
support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4374
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A Picken
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4440
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford
Affordable housing is a must with extra services, eg post offices and bus services
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4545
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association
support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4605
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris
The proportion of mixed housing is too high and will reduce the viability of the developers.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4695
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Cllr. Prof Maurice Shutler
WDCs housing need shows 90% of new housing needs to be for rent. Govt. unlikely to make money available to housing associations or council to build. New houses will go to persons currently in Birmingham who can afford market housing. They will then commute to and from Birmingham, Coventry or London adding to traffic.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4710
Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009
Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt
Any land available (not green belt) should be affordable.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4833
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke
As previously stated the plans show no desire to use all land currently available without making further in roads into green belt land
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4876
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4911
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Joyce A Green
Object to Kings Hill site:
Housing that starts as affordable gains value in time. Will government decide new affordable homes will be needed. Too many people dealing with debt, repossession of property and loss of jobs. The answer is not to build new properties and certainly not on green belt land.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4966
Derbyniwyd: 08/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Harrison
It is impossible to reach an informed judgement until the viability tests have been undertaken. However, the principle is sound.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5055
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Michael Morris
Most essential
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5148
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts
100% of affordable homes should be on rejuvenation/brown field sites.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5217
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Sonia Owczarek
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5244
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood
Unless redevelop existing brownfields sites.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5247
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood
object