Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5288

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: J. N. Price

I believe that further study is required in order to establish both the definition of 'affordable' and the proportion of such homes needed in the different parts of the district.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5348

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: SEAN DEELY

The proportion of affordable housing should not be increased. The ratio is already too high. Within the current ratios, housing for key workers should be specifically allocated.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5400

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Baxter

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5440

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mike Cheeseman

I agree that housing will be become more dense. I believe that on larger developments this is best achieved by a lowish compulsory base allowed to rise if extant commercial reality at the time supports it. I don't think it should ever exceed a nominal 40% unless it becomes 100%.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5478

Derbyniwyd: 27/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Illingworth

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5532

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Nifer y bobl: 2

I am concerned that 50% is too large a percentage for this area unless there are some rules like we see in some seaside locations where you cannot purchase property unless you have lived in the area for some years, which means the housing is really used by those growing up in the area and want to get onto the property ladder, not a whole host of immigrants.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5556

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joyce Reynolds

Object to Kings Hill site:
If this is intended as overspill for Coventry why is affordable housing not 20%?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5578

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: George Martin

The requirement for affordable homes should not be lowered to 30% due to the current economic situation.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5663

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Jane Boynton

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5708

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roger Warren

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5772

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Philip Wilson

Affordable homes - yes - but first define the term affordable home within the context of what is a realistic average weekly income for a household of two people with one or more children.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5855

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Pamela Payne

Affordable housing should mean housing for those on benefits, those on low income, those who don't earn that much but don't qualify for any type of help either, as well as those on good salaries.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5919

Derbyniwyd: 05/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Affordable housing would be more preferrable but again lead to more traffic congestion.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5929

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Roberts

It should not just be on site to site allocation but varied overall for the best spread of housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6004

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Harris

30% social housing is a little large.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6031

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6081

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Coventry is all ready over crowded why add to the burden if other places can be found.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6117

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Stephen Trinder

Object to Kings Hill site:
This part of Coventry has few social homes and 40% social housing mix would give concern as rich pickings for new residents who don't wish to make contribution but seek to live by criminality. Poorer parts of any city contain criminals and anti-social people and many moving into social housing are fine, simply looking for affordable place to live, but sadly statistics tell their own story.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6128

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard and Judy Swallow

Nifer y bobl: 2

Ok so long as there is a mix.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6201

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6352

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Jessamine

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6379

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Veronica Jessamine

Who will live in these houses? They will be expensive houses if builders are foced to build 60% private and 40% social housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6395

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ed & Zoe Rycroft

Nifer y bobl: 2

Providing a mix of 40% council/housing association 60% market houses is too great. I don't know of anywhere else where the density of council houses is so high. I also challenge the location of them, as people needing affordable housing need to be near the local services without needing a car. by placing so many council owned or housing association houses south of Warwick Gates will restrict the quality of life of those trying to get back on their feet.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6449

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: graham leeke

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6529

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Julian Humphreys

Proposal to concentrate building in small number of large housing sites alongside existing built up areas, completely contradicts strategic objective as well as ignoring green paper 'Houses for the future:more affordable, more sustainable', to dampen down house price inflation by providing more affordable housing in areas where demand outstrips supply.
Villages and rural communities are in decline and unlikely to survive unless there is a significant move to provide affordable housing and employment opportunities needed in these affected areas. Locations proposed will only contribute to this decline. Need to promote growth around villages and market towns sympathetically and proportionate to needs and not just build for the sake of it.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6617

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: James Mackay

Above all, local need is for affordable housing, sustainably sited. Extensive greenfield development necessitating high car use would not permit either affordable or sustainable life styles.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6731

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6825

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stuart Boyle

Low Cost Housing

The council has stated that it requires 50 percent of the new developments to be low cost housing. I object to the creation of up to 2,000 low cost houses in one area. Such a development would create an area of relative depravation and poverty. It would have a high concentration of health and crime problems and would increase demand on local services for little additional council tax income.

New low cost housing should be dispersed for better integration with the community. It should also be developed closer to town centres to facilitate habitation by non car owners. The ex Ford foundry, Station Approach and Warwickshire College sites are more appropriate for low cost housing development.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6950

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Affordable Housing
The proportion of affordable housing should not be increased. The ratio is already high. Within the current ratios, housing for key workers should be specifically allocated.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7006

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

The proposals are draconian in concept and does not lead to workable solutions which satisfy acceptable criteria. The larger sites could possibly accommodate such guidelines but smaller sites would require much more research taking account of local need.