Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69372

Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Louis Skiffington

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Loss of green belt would impact on future generations the environment and character of Leamington would suffer irreversible damage.. There would be a huge impact on wildlife and on the quality of life for residents.
The green belt is to prevent urban sprawl. Once it is breached it could be the beginning of a land rush with more land being banked for future development. The trend for increasing housebuilding in the green belt will erode our countryside effect wildlife habitats, carbon capture, food production and the prevention of flooding. The csense of well being derived from the countryside will also be destroyed.
Brownfield sites should be regenerated first. Economic growth does not constitute exceptional circumstances for development in the green belt. No exceptional circumstances exist and Coventry Council should look closer to home for sites as north of Leamington will not help their housing problems. The area provides valuable farming land.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69375

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Christopher Sutton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The green belt should remain as it is north of Leamington and the proposed allocation deleted. The housing need to cater for Coventry overspill should be better located to Coventry and on more sustainable transport routes/ social infrastructure.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69377

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs. Christine Sutton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

If land is to support Coventry's needs, unlikely that people from Coventry will live here.
Suitable sites closer to Coventry on land of lower green belt value.
Loss of farmland.
Park and ride unworkable - no dedicated buses and sufficient parking in Leamington.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69401

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Dr Martin Davis

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

No exceptional circumstances have been demonstrated to justify removal of land and allocation for housing.
Development should be reallocated closer to Coventry which is of lower Green Belt value.
Proposal for park and ride would not work
Increase in traffic congestion
The development would destroy the rural character of Milverton

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69409

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Old Milverton & Blackdown JPC

Asiant : Hunter Page Planning

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

is the position of Old Milverton and Blackdown Joint Parish Council that the proposed strategic allocation at Old Milverton will not meet the needs of Coventry and is not suitable for such purposes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69415

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Jane Greasley

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

This proposal would mean the "green lung" between Kenilworth and Warwick is reduced to less than 1.5 miles. The proposals will destroy the approach to the historic town. Highly productive farmland will be lost together with wildlife habitats. This area is highly valued for recreation. The railway station would be unviable due to the construction required.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69420

Derbyniwyd: 17/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Alison Williams

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances have not been demonstrated. Brownfield sites nearer Coventry should be available.
These fields act as important green lung between Kenilworth and Leamington and are highly valued for recreation as well as being important for wildlife and biodiversity. This is productive farmland which also soaks away water to prevent flooding. It is unlikely that people who want to live in Coventry will want housing in Milverton.
The park and ride scheme is unnecessary and unsustainable as the site is too close to Leamington.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69422

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs J M Warr

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The housing demand is from Coventry and sites should be in that area. the increased travelling by developing here will increase congestion. The development would impact on the attractive approach to the town. High value green belt land will be lost. This is productive farm land and an important local amenity. It is also important for wildlife
the park and ride has no decent bus service and is not of value to shoppers . Any railway station would be impossible to construct nd would be too near Kenilworth station. Drainage and sewerage problems will be exacerbated by the proposed housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69426

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Michael Warr

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances have not been demonstrated for removal of this area from the green belt. Sites closer to Coventry would be more sustainable - for instance extra traffic would be counter-productive. The traffic would also increase pollution. The proposals also require unnecessary road improvements. The high house prices in this location are unlikely to accommodate Coventry's working population. the proposals would impact on the character and attractiveness of this area. this land is highly valued by locals and is productive farmland.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69430

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr J C Clack

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstance for release of the land north of Milverton from the Green Belt have not been demonstrated. The site is needed to support Coventry's need. There are more appropriate sites closer to Coventry. This site will cause unnecessary commuting, and congestion and road building.
This area provides productive farmland. It also provide important habitats for a range of wildlife and contains mature hedgerows. The open nature of the land also enable water to soak away and restores aquifers.
Housing in this area will exacerbate flood risk and potentially subsequent pollution of watercourses.
Traffic congestion is compounded by problems at Thickthorn A46 junction. Development north of Milverton, combined with development at Thickthorn means this will get worse and not even a dual carriageway will assist. In addition there will be problems for emergency vehicles.
The proposed park and ride would means buses are caught up the gridlock - the park and ride at Stratford has not worked.
There is no requirement for Coventry's residents to move here, so how does the proposal meet Coventry's needs.
the proposed railway station would be costly and track restrictions would mean services are infrequent.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69439

Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley McDonagh

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Park and ride scheme not required - if it was, should be located close to A46
Coventry housing shortfall should be sited near Coventry - minimise commuting and pollution
Green belt prevents coalescence in this location

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69445

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Simon Stribblehill

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances don't exist to remove land from green belt.
Sites closer to Coventry should be used.
Park and Ride not appropriate.
Car parking will exacerbate flooding
Lack of demand.
Adverse impact on sensitive and attractive landscape.
Adverse impact on recreational amenity
Loss of green belt
Additional traffic and congestion
Lack of supporting infrastructure

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69491

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mary Horne

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

-There is enough land in Coventry to take their overflow.
-There will be great loss of wildlife and habitat.
-Loss of farmland which affect farmers.
-With all the proposed houses there will be pollution.
-There will be drainage problems.
-The peace & quiet in the area will be drowned with noise of cars, etc.
-We do not need another railway station.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69496

Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2016

Ymatebydd: James Plaskitt

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The allocation of this site conflicts with Coventry and Warwick's objectives. In the case of Coventry, the Plan focuses on employment growth. As a result this allocation means that employment growth is not co-located with housing growth. Warwick's plan seeks to only allocate green field sites where they are located close to areas of employment. This is not the case. Further the site is not appropriate, particularly as Coventry seek to bring forward sites adjacent to the City boundary to avoid in-commuting. So the site is inconsistent with the plan's objectives.
In this context Kings Hill is far more logical

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69499

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Dr. Martin Simons

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

-There are sites closer to Coventry that should be used in preference to that proposed.
-People in Coventry are unlikely to buy homes North of Milverton.
-Precedence for releasing land from greenbelt requires 'value' from the potential sites to be taken into account. Sites close to Coventry are of lower greenbelt value.
-The 'green lung' between Leamington and Kenilworth will be reduced to less than 1 1/2 miles.
-Highly productive farming land and wildlife habitat will be lost.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69505

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Cllr Bill Gifford

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

In order for Modifications 14 and 16 of Warwick District's Local Plan to be sound, the land to the north of Milverton would have to remain in the Green Belt. Warwick District Council has not provided the evidence of Exceptional Circumstances to justify removing the land to the north of Milverton from the Green Belt. There are sites adjacent to Coventry that could meet Coventry's Housing need and are deliverable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69531

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Dr Alexandra Tansey

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of this land from the green belt have not been demonstrated. Highly productive land will be lost as well as established wildlife habitats and a green lung between Kenilworth and Leamington. This area is highly valued for recreation. This would lead to commuting to Coventry on already over-congested roads.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69540

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Dr. & Mrs. Adrain & Margaret Newell

Nifer y bobl: 2

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

-'Exceptional Circumstances' required by NPPF not met
- land available near Coventry available - would reduce commuting, congestion and road building.
- houses will not be used by Coventry people
- 'green lung' will be reduced.
- Farmland and wildlife habitat will be lost.
- area of leisure for residents will be lost.
- Park and ride scheme will be of no use - no dedicated buses, site too close to Leamington, such schemes used only in large towns, only non-residents use this scheme.
- Leamington a small historic town with narrow streets and turns.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69541

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Scott Moore

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

-The 'exceptional circumstances' required by NPPF is not demonstrated.
-The purpose of greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl. Developing this area will reduce the distance between Leamington and Kenilworth to 1 1/2 miles.
- Much lower value green belt land is available near Coventry for the development.
- Loss of productive farming land, established wildlife and area valued by the community for walking, running, etc.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69562

Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Lambert

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The Park and Ride development is considered unsustainable because:-
- there is insufficient demand by visitors;
- the end destination has sufficient parking;
- there is insufficient time advantage in the location.

Better alternative locations exist - eg: adjacent to the A46.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69581

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Rob & Donna Clifton

Nifer y bobl: 2

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Sites should be considered near or within Coventry City to fulfil Coventry's requirement.
- Loss of highly productive farming land and wildlife habitat.
- Park and ride scheme will increase length of time for commuters journey and add to congestion.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69592

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Joan Bowden

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Exceptional circumstances are not stated
- sites on edge of Coventry of less green belt value and should be used first
- Area north of Milverton is of great value for walking, running and natural history.
- Area provides a 'green lung' between Kenilworth and Leamington.
- It is a productive farming land with rich wildlife habitat.
- Coventry public will be better served by new homes being built nearer to Coventry
- need to reduce journeys to work
- increased traffic will be exacerbated by additional houses.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69632

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Roger Johnson

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Exceptional circumstances not justified
- Land has high value, residential properties to be built would likely be of high value and as these properties would be much closer to Leamington and Kenilworth than to Coventry, they would be more attractive to live and work in those locations, than in Coventry.
- Proposed plan will add problems caused by commuting like increase in traffic, poor air quality, etc.
- Park and Ride scheme unsustainable
- new station would require significant infrastructure

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69676

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Claire Fuller

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

No exceptional circumstances to remove land north of Milverton (H44) from the Green Belt
There are lower value Green belt land nearer to Coventry

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69682

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Biddlecombe

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

I am concerned that these proposals to support housing for Coventry will increase traffic locally and lead to further congestion. The local road network is already stretched to beyond capacity. Also a lot of amenity land will be lost and the green gap between Leamington and Kenilworth will be reduced further.
Wildlife habitats will be lost and traffic noise levels and pollution will increase.
The area is used by a lot of dog walkers and ramblers and these activities will not be possible with the proposals.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69701

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Philip Jeary

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The exceptional circumstances do not exist for removing land North of Milverton from the Green belt. It would affect the openness of the countryside
Road infrastructure would not cope with extra development
Development would be unsustainable and increase commuting

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69737

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: G. Lightfoot

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69738

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Professor David Hardiman

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The site will extend northern border of Leamington into greenfield land.
Important green lung and leisure facility. Without this open space residents would be forced to drive to different ones, adding to traffic congestion.
Increase in traffic and congestion.
Adverse impact on character of Old Milverton
Adverse impact on green belt and landscape
Exceptional circumstances have not been demonstrated to justify loss of green belt

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69745

Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016

Ymatebydd: T and J Walter

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to allocation: -
- site lies within green belt - no exceptional circumstances have been demonstrated to justify its development
- loss of open space between Leamington and Kenilworth
- should consider land at Kings Hill, Westwood Heath and Hurst Farm
- park and ride unsustainable - insufficient demand and wrong location

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69819

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mark Aynsley

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to allocation: -
- better sites available
- loss of green belt not justified - no exceptional circumstances
- loss of recreational amenity
- adverse impact on character of area