Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70200

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Seton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Removal of land north of Milverton from the Green Belt is unsound. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which have lower green belt value. Leamington will almost be joined to Kenilworth and will undermine the sense of community for both towns. Productive farmland will be lost along with important habitats and an area which is used for recreation. The park and ride scheme will not work as most employment is south of the towns; there is plenty of parking in Leamington, and there will be no dedicated buses.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70202

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs. Preeti Gupta

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

No exceptional circumstances exist to remove site from green belt.
Development to support Coventry - sites closer to Coventry available to develop.
Green belt land has value for ecology.
Loss of green lung
Development should take place on non-green belt land.
Development will cause congestion.
Park and ride unsustainable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70205

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Miss Vishaka Gupta

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to H44: -
- loss of green open space
- loss of wildlife habitats
- adverse effect on character and amenity of town
- adverse impact on landscape

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70206

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr M J Birch

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to H44: -
- exceptional circumstances required by NPPF do not exist to remove land from green belt
- sustainable sites closer to Coventry that should be used in preference to this one
- alternative sites will reduce commuting, congestion and road construction
- loss of productive farmland
- loss of wildlife habitat
- unsustainable park and ride scheme

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70207

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Hucks

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated.
development would spoil the Old Milverton and Blackdown areas.
The area is well used for recreation.
Coventry's needs should be met in the area immediately adjacent to the City.
the infrastructure to support the housing does not exist. South of the river has more space and is better supported by infrastructure.
This land provides a pleasant entrance to Leamington and helps make it a great place to live

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70208

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Eric Hucks

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated.
development would spoil the Old Milverton and Blackdown areas.
The area is well used for recreation.
Coventry's needs should be met in the area immediately adjacent to the City.
The infrastructure to support the housing does not exist. South of the river has more space and is better supported by infrastructure.
This area form an important part of the entrance in the Leamington and helps make it a pleasant place to live

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70210

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. & Mrs. Douglas & Valerie Burcham

Nifer y bobl: 2

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to H44: -
- no evidence of people in Coventry wanting to live in Leamington
- no evidence of demand analysis
- commuting increases congestion
- appropriate sites closer to Coventry
- reuse brownfield sites
- access constrained by congestion on A452, A445; railway
- hard surfaces increase flooding risk
- three alternatives minimise congestion - Thickthorn; between Hatton and A46; north of A46 / SE of A429 junction.
- loss of recreational amenity
- unsustainable park and ride
- "safeguarding" a misnomer; green belt not being preserved
- railway station unfeasible
- lack of detail on sewerage capacity

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70211

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Alan Hingley

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which have lower green belt value. Productive farmland will be lost along with important habitats and an area which is used for recreation. the green lung between Kenilworth and Leamington will be reduced, leading a coalescence of the two towns. Use of sites closer to Coventry will reduce unnecessary commuting, road congestion and pollution.
the park and ride is unlikely to be viabale and will not be convenient as it won't have a dedicated bus service. There is also adequate parking in Leamington and the site is located too close to the town. Further the major employers are south of the towns.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70212

Derbyniwyd: 13/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Barbara Hingley

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which have lower green belt value. Productive farmland will be lost along with important habitats and an area which is used for recreation. the green lung between Kenilworth and Leamington will be reduced, leading a coalescence of the two towns. Use of sites closer to Coventry will reduce unnecessary commuting, road congestion and pollution.
the park and ride is unlikely to be viable and will not be convenient as it won't have a dedicated bus service. There is also adequate parking in Leamington and the site is located too close to the town. Further the major employers are south of the towns.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70213

Derbyniwyd: 09/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs. Carmen Formby

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The proposed park and ride is located too close to Leamington and could then also serve Coventry and Warwick. Further most of the traffic is heading to employment and retail areas south of Warwick

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70214

Derbyniwyd: 06/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Paul Formby

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The proposed park and ride is located too close to Leamington and could then also serve Coventry and Warwick. Further most of the traffic is heading to employment and retail areas south of Warwick

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70236

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Miss Melanie Astell

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to proposals: -
- exceptional circumstances required by NPPF for allocation of green belt have not been demonstrated
- unlikely that people that work in Coventry will want to live in Milverton
- lower value green belt sites closer to Coventry should be used in preference
- promoting commuting from Milverton to Coventry
- increased traffic congestion
- open space between Leamington and Kenilworth will be lost

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70237

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Simon Bennett

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Development of land between Leamington and Kenilworth would have a negative impact on both towns' identities.
Rural towns should stay rural and not be allowed to become one sprawling mass.
The farmland identified for use has particular natural beauty with country walks through the middle giving everyone every one the chance to enjoy both wildlife and scenery.
These proposals are not credible at any level and should be rejected without any consideration for approval.
The park and ride is a ludicrous idea; we have ample parking in Leamington town centre.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70251

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr David Bradshaw

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The land north of Leamington should remain in the green belt and Coventry's housing needs can be obtained on land nearer to Coventry; land which has already been identified as suitable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70254

Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Miss Ruth Buckley

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to proposal: -
- area north of Milverton unsuitable for proposed development as aim Coventry's housing needs rather than Leamington's
- loss of productive agricultural land
- loss of wildlife habitats
- park and ride unnecessary waste of land and money - no demand
- Leamington not large enough to sustain park and ride
-new railway would be too expensive

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70257

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ann Kelsey

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to allocation: -
- inappropriate location to meet Coventry's needs
- exacerbate commuting
- air quality
- sites of lower green belt value available closer to Coventry
- increase housing density / delivery rate at Kings Heath
- reassess Coventry's own sites
- Nuneaton co-operates with overspill provision
- loss of open space between Leamington and Kenilworth
- adverse impact on landscape, character of area, recreational and sporting activity, heritage, wildlife and habitats
- loss of high quality farmland
- railway station unviable
- park and ride unsustainable

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70270

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Residents Objecting to Development at Milverton 352

Nifer y bobl: 352

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Do not support allocation of land north of Milverton for housing