No

ID sylw: 86039

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Jean-Pierre Laake

No to building on SG18 and greenbelt land:
1. Previous planning applications in SG18 have not been supported by councillors.
2. High land of SG18 overlooks Bishopton, Shottery Conservation Area and the Racecourse and will irreparably damage natural surrouding views
3. SG18 is valued as green leisure space by existing residents
4. SG18 is too many miles from town centre to promote active transport
5. SG18 is segregated from town by a46 and the western relief road
6. There are better brownfield sites closer to the town centre including disused poor quality architectural retail space and SG19

Yes

ID sylw: 86063

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 86132

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Corrie

Brownfield should be used to facilitate house building. the Green Belt need to be preserved with the few exceptions allowed in the existing planning framework.

No

ID sylw: 86250

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Michelle McHugh

I don't agree with the approach

No

ID sylw: 86252

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Michelle McHugh

Town centres should be regenerated, not new developments / or growth of existing developments

No

ID sylw: 86405

Derbyniwyd: 23/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Chennells

Planning needs carefull planning and proposals should not be bulldozed through I could keep talking about all of the building that has happened in your previous plans until 2025/30 this next trance needs careful consideration as what is being planned will have a detrimental affect on the local residents and the environment. There is not space for the infrastructure to be implemented and our roads will become dangerous and congested and Rouncil Lane and surrounding roads will cause traffic jams etc. please just reconsider this development

Other

ID sylw: 86621

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Trevor Bradnam

Potential brownfield development sites should not be at the expense of the local environment

No

ID sylw: 86780

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr russell gillott

The 'need' for more development is a direct consequence of mass immigration. This is in turn ruining public services. The idea that 'growth' is essential, and dependent on concreting over the countryside is utter fallacy. It's old, out dated thinking and in direct conflict with any sense of understanding of the climate change emergency we are living in. Short termist and selfish. True 'sustainable' development would be entirely different to what the govt and thus county are proposing.

No

ID sylw: 86904

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

No

ID sylw: 87010

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

I am not convinced that enough consideration is being given to local communities and how new developments will integrate effectively in, it also doesn’t effectly answer the pressures on infrastructure in higher designated areas of build, it also doesn’t look at local green and renewable energy production requirements,

No

ID sylw: 87068

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Dawn Thomas

I think INFASTRUCTURE and QUIET GREEN AREAS should be at the top of the list when building, growing and expanding are proposed. FUTURE generations will depend on our approach NOW.

No

ID sylw: 87112

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

As a resident in Warwickshire I am greatly concerned as to how many spaces are potentially going to allocated to growth areas, and, how I the Kenilworth area, HS2 is going to used as an excuse to fuel expansion and close the gap between Coventry and Kenilworth. There is also not enough application of policies later in this proposal to the growth areas to challenge their size, location and also green credentials.

Yes

ID sylw: 87228

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Oliver Jacques

A Park and Ride scheme to serve both Warwick and Leamington would alleviate traffic congestion in both towns and allow for the town centres to become less car-dependent and more welcoming and safe areas to visit, work and shop. A site in between Warwick and Leamington to the south near the M40 would be ideal.

Yes

ID sylw: 87382

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

ID sylw: 87717

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr justin kerridge

yes

Other

ID sylw: 88051

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Brownfield land for development is fine. Green belt land should not be considered though. If we are taliking about development for commercial use then there is limited demand for offices in South Warwickshire appart from on existing Business Parks.

Other

ID sylw: 88052

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

I agree with brownfield sites being used for development I do not agree with greenbelt being used when there are other alternatives. I also question the need for more office/industrial developments when there are plenty of voids on existing business/industrial parks within the area for commercial property.

Yes

ID sylw: 88297

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Tristram

Developing brownfield sites makes perfect sense, but the all construction must be to a high standard and designed to be 'in keeping' with the local environs

No

ID sylw: 88398

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Annette Pharo

According to the study shown, there is no need for further industrial provision within the Stratford area so why would destroying greenfield sites next to the historically important village of Wilmcote be acceptable?

Yes

ID sylw: 88573

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Nicholls

Whilst I am broudly supportive of new house building in the area, with regards to this proposed site on the edge of Barford, I believe that the infrastructure would need significant upgrading to support any new homes. Particular issues are water, roads, broadband and electricity. Severn Trent have needed to make repeated repairs and investigate contamination in water due to aging pipes. Broadband is slow (~30Mbps) and contested, roadways are narrow country roads, already too busy, and electricity infrastructure is already prone to blackouts and unable to adequately support feeding into the grid with solar.

Other

ID sylw: 88747

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

All brownfield sites regardless of size need to be considered and there are several sites in south warwickshire that could be used for this purpose.

Yes

ID sylw: 88923

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Haidee Smith

No extra roads shown on the map so existing country roads would be blocked as well as the Birmingham road which is already very busy. Stratford and the surrounding villages do not have the schools, medical amenities or transport infrastructure to support extra traffic it struggles already- often gridlocked due to the over zealous use of traffic lights. The area is often subject to flooding so with the run off will end up in the new houses! Our countryside haven and house prices will be destroyed as the character houses will be swallowed by boring rows of boxes.

Yes

ID sylw: 89015

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Vitally important that all new development is built to highest specification and will not need retrofitting in the future

Yes

ID sylw: 89390

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

Yes

ID sylw: 89751

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

Compton Verney is broadly supportive of the South Warwickshire plan.

No

ID sylw: 89857

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr SIMON BEACHAM

Site BW: at all costs don't spoil our beautiful rural countryside at the expense of meeting targets, think of the legacy left for future generations!

No

ID sylw: 90365

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Sankey

This is a lovely area and does not need ruining!!!

Other

ID sylw: 90445

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart

The chapter already includes reference to potential development sites (Abbey Fields) that have been identified as economically unattractive. The BW strategic growth proposal is another such area that will turn out to be completely unaffordable for development. Similarly it is widely evidenced that the Long Marston development has been unable to proceed due to withdrawal of plans and funding for the relief road intended to service it.

No

ID sylw: 90481

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

Although principles are laudable, application is not consistent. SG17 is not sustainable, due to mainly to flood risk.

Other

ID sylw: 90594

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stephen Davies

I find the complexity of the information overwhelming and cannot comment on the 'layered' fields provided. I am unable to understand the map, which prevents me from knowing if there are plans to expand Bellway Homes' existing planning permission to the north of Rugby Road, Cubbington. If there are intentions to develop further westward, I wish to object due to concerns about unnecessary development on Green Belt land and the additional pressure on already stretched services and amenities. If no expansion is planned, I have no objections.