Other

ID sylw: 96932

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Yet again, there is little control over whether the aspirations expressed will ultimately achieved. There are too many ifs

Other

ID sylw: 97323

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy White

N/A

No

ID sylw: 97368

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carol Longford

Residential development and employment development are completely separate issues and should not be confused. Central residential settlement sites can be described as sustainable but utilise green space which has valuable community need.

No

ID sylw: 97385

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Nicola Harris

My main concern as a resident of the local area for nearly 10 years, is about infrastructure to support the proposed increase in housing. The road network around Hatton and Bearley is inadequate with many issues arising from flash flooding, narrow lanes and general inaccessibility. Adding such quantity of housing will exacerbate already difficult conditions.

Other

ID sylw: 97709

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

William Davis Limited want to highlight the directive from Matthew Pennycook MP to the Planning Inspectorate issued in July 2024 which is clear around the level of pragmatism to be given to Local Plan Examinations. This has already impacted a number of Local Plans which have been withdrawn for Examination, including nearby Solihull. It is therefore imperative that the Regulation 19 SWLP is sufficiently robust, taking into account the concerns raised by William Davis Limited in these representations, and is considered ready for Examination as highlighted by Section 20(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Other

ID sylw: 97741

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Development requirements are fine in theory but are realistic only if they can be shown to be acceptable from the point of view of feasibility and cost. It is apparent that much assessment needs to be carried out and that there is no clear evidence that aspirations of the plan will be supported by developers and those involved in creating an appropriate infrastructure. Without these, the requirements become a wish list.
Site boundaries are not correct. In BW land at Pasture Barn Cottage, CV37 0ER is shown as having been put forward for development which is not the case.

No

ID sylw: 98462

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Holly Farm Business Park

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

To provide certainty the planning process should focus on:

• the level of growth required - housing and employment
• how this should be accommodated, urban/ rural, small, medium and strategic level growth including a possible new settlement(s)
• a 2-part plan
• identify and carry out settlement boundary reviews
• embrace Green/Grey Belt including suitability of sites 239 and 530 at HFBP
• infrastructure ‘in the round’ taking full account of the move to zero emission vehicles, and
• 20-minute neighbourhoods in urban and rural areas alike, including potential housing growth/ new settlement at the former RAF Honiley airfield.

Other

ID sylw: 98465

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: SupremeTech

Asiant : Delta Planning

SupremeTech supports South Warwickshire’s objective of developing in the most sustainable locations. SupremeTech are promoting Land off Princes Drive, Kenilworth (Site Ref. 54) to meet local employment needs which falls entirely within Priority Area 1.

SupremeTech supports the general approach to identifying Spatial Growth Options however considers that Land off Princes Drive, Kenilworth should either be included within a Strategic Growth Option (such as Strategic Growth Location SG01 if this option is to be pursued), or allocated for development separately at the next stage of the local plan process.

Please refer to our full response for further details.

No

ID sylw: 98468

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Holly Farm Business Park

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

To provide certainty the planning process should focus on:
• the level of growth required - housing and employment
• how this should be accommodated, urban/ rural, small, medium and strategic level growth including a possible new settlement(s)
• a single (not 2-part) plan
• identify and carry out settlement boundary reviews
• embrace Green/Grey Belt including sites 239 and 530 at HFBP
• infrastructure ‘in the round’ taking full account of the move to zero emission vehicles, and
• 20-minute neighbourhoods in urban and rural areas alike, including potential housing growth/ new settlement at the former RAF Honiley airfield.

Yes

ID sylw: 98484

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Philip Sykes

All brownfield sites, regardless of size, need to be considered.

No

ID sylw: 98563

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr steve clews

I object to the proposed housing development. An influx of vehicles will worsen traffic congestion, increase noise and air pollution, and render our narrow roads unsafe for pedestrians. Local facilities—including already oversubscribed schools and strained healthcare services—risk being overwhelmed. The loss of green space and belt, vital for maintaining our rural character, would lead to urban sprawl and environmental degradation. Increased water run-off may further exacerbate flooding, significantly impacting our community’s quality of life. While the housing need is real, the negative effects on traffic, pollution, local facilities, and our cherished rural landscape mean this particular development should not proceed.

Yes

ID sylw: 98732

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Deeley Properties

Asiant : Delta Planning

Deeley Properties supports South Warwickshire’s objective of developing in the most sustainable locations and the identification of land around Gaydon/Lighthorne Heath as a Priority Area 1 which Deeley strongly supports.

Deeley Properties supports the general approach to identifying Spatial Growth Options and in turn, fully supports Strategic Growth Location – Gaydon Lighthorne Heath Group (SG13).

Deeley Properties supports the intention to meet the full amount of this identified requirement (125ha) in the SWLP (and the identification of Area 8 as the best spatial location to meet the need

Please refer to our full response for further details.

Other

ID sylw: 98847

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: AC Lloyd - Sites 152, 156 & 157

Asiant : Delta Planning

AC Lloyd supports the objective of prioritising development within the most sustainable locations.
AC Lloyd supports the general approach to identifying Spatial Growth Options in principle. SG10 includes AC Lloyd sites at Bishops Tachbrook (Sites 152, 156 and 157).
As the new Standard Method is in place this must now be applied and the plan must accommodate the higher housing figure (54,450 dwellings) for the plan period. In addition, any housing needs that cannot be met within neighbouring planning authority areas should also be taken into account in establishing the amount of housing to be planned for.

See full response.

Other

ID sylw: 98851

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Ducker

Particularly do not agree with using green belt land which is useful and beneficial for farming and wildlife

No

ID sylw: 98990

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

To provide certainty the planning process should focus on:
• the level of growth required - housing and employment
• how this should be accommodated, urban/ rural, small, medium and strategic level growth including a possible new settlement(s)
• a single (rather than 2-part) plan
• identify and carry out settlement boundary reviews
• embrace Green/Grey Belt including suitability of sites 524 and 622
• infrastructure ‘in the round’ taking full account of the move to zero emission vehicles, and
• 20-minute neighbourhoods in urban and rural areas alike, including potential expansion of Kingswood.

Other

ID sylw: 99008

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Thomas

I broadly support DPD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9.
In the focus on brownfield sites, near existing superstructure, large sites to enable infrastructure.
I don't support cutting down woodlands or building on flood plains.
I do not support road building as it induces more road building.
While I broadly support the protection of green belt land it may direct building to the South of the area where there is little infrastructure. DPD 5 should be stronger to support new building on larger sites to include transport infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 99064

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kevan Russell

I agree.

Other

ID sylw: 99318

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The planning process seems to have run into various cul-de-sacs. There is a need to focus on:

• the level of growth required - housing and employment
• how this should be accommodated, urban/ rural, small, medium and strategic level growth including a possible new settlement(s)
• a single rather than 2-part plan
• settlement boundary reviews or establish where appropriate
• embrace updated NPPF especially with regard to Green Belt and Grey Belt
• embrace infrastructure ‘in the round’
• deploy development to help achieve 20-minute neighbourhoods in all areas.

No

ID sylw: 99466

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

Major growth has already taken place with recent and current developments including HS2

Other

ID sylw: 99537

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Murray

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 99608

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

Broadly agree, subject to my comments on individual policies and site.

No

ID sylw: 99614

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Bull

There is no need for the extent of the proposed growth. Statistics show there is more deaths than births so therefore there should be ample accommodation already available.

No

ID sylw: 99639

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Welford on Avon Parish Council

Please work harder at finding additional sites in urban areas rayher that destroying the countryside.

No

ID sylw: 100222

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Ann Colley

New developments is not sustainable on the environment!

Yes

ID sylw: 100287

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 100484

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Burgess

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 100502

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr peter spreadbury

- "Hero Projects" (large, costly, creative and complex) rarely go to plan, they consume more planning time, more change management, more risk of all sorts than delivering the same outcome with a larger number of smaller projects.
- Run many smaller projects (<100 homes) that give a faster return on investment, earlier measurable progress, far less political, cultural, environmental challenges.
- The voters will support plans that don't take 5 years to get approval before the first spade goes in the ground and then take 10 years of chaos and muddy roads to deliver another bland, poorly built housing estate.

Other

ID sylw: 100618

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janine McComiskey

I wanted to add this information from the Old Milverton and Blackdown Council:
The Local Plan's own Sustainability Appraisal shows that:
• Strategic Growth Locations which are NOT in the green belt have capacity for 48,500 dwellings (Table 5.1).
• New Settlements which are NOT in the green belt have capacity for a further 6,000 dwellings (Table 6.1).
This means that it is possible to meet housing need without building on green belt land. Sufficient capacity exists at
Strategic Growth Locations outside the Green Belt to meet the Local Plan dwelling requirements to 2050.

No

ID sylw: 100656

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sophie Weatherley

Overall I do not support this plan as there is too much within this which is counter to the interests of residents who have chosen to live and enjoy life in rural villages. Introducing large scale settlements to these areas is inappropriate and does not take sufficient consideration of the rural heritage, the current road infrastructure connecting to main roads such as A46, M40, A435.

Other

ID sylw: 100820

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: AC Lloyd - Site 174

Asiant : Delta Planning

AC Lloyd supports the objective of prioritising development within the most sustainable locations. AC Lloyd supports the general approach to identifying Spatial Growth Options in principle. SG06 includes AC Lloyd sites at land at Blackdown, Leamington Spa (reference 174). As the new Standard Method is in place this must now be applied and the plan must accommodate the higher housing figure (54,450 dwellings) for the plan period. In addition, any housing needs that cannot be met within neighbouring planning authority areas should also be taken into account in establishing the amount of housing to be planned for. See full response.