Other

ID sylw: 85965

Derbyniwyd: 10/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Graham Ball

If 50,000 new homes really are needed in Warwickshire in future, I propose that the plan suggests that they could all be provided by 125 tower blocks with 50 floors with 8 flats per floor. 125 tower blocks would not take up much space. A few 50 floor offices would provide jobs. No further housing would be needed elsewhere in Warwickshire. The council would thus demonstrate it can deliver government targets and show that the targets are ridiculous because this development clearly wouldn't improve per capita living standards of pre-existing Warwickshire residents who have a fertility rate of below 2.

Yes

ID sylw: 86003

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kate Harris

If a brownfield site is not considered to be in a suitable location I would welcome the Authority supporting and facilitating use for other purposes in particular environmental

Yes

ID sylw: 86062

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 86118

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Thomas Hoare

Brown field sites should always take presidence over sites in green belt , I firmly believe productive agricultural land ( not grazing )should be preserved ,

No

ID sylw: 86130

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Corrie

Brownfield sites should be used for development, Green Belt land should not be used for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 86239

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Brightburn

I'm not seeing many sites in existing urban centres featuring in the numbers on housing? Leamington for example has a number of potential town centre sites. These would be sustainable locations and support other regeneration activities. Are these being taken into account at all?

No

ID sylw: 86251

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Michelle McHugh

No, some brownfield land has historical significance - there should not be assumed that brownfield land should be developed on. Town centres should be regenerated

Yes

ID sylw: 86318

Derbyniwyd: 21/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Daniel Chandler

Brownfield sites should absolutely be prioritised

Yes

ID sylw: 86452

Derbyniwyd: 25/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carole Johnson

Brownfield sites should always be the first option

Other

ID sylw: 86591

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

"Consideration" for the use of Brownfield sites for non development uses is not strong enough. If any greenfield sites are developed, then Brownfield sites MUST be redeveloped for sustainable and low carbon uses first.

Yes

ID sylw: 86605

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Darrell Muffitt

Whereas I agree with the focus on brownfield development I believe that a much more proactive approach is needed to repopulating town centres in advance of regeneration. Too many town centres are dead or dying and there seem to be a lack of tangible ideas to tackle the issue.

No

ID sylw: 86903

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Not in favour of any development except dealing with derelict areas in the town centre. Already too much development, taxes too high, flooding a problem

Yes

ID sylw: 87009

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

You need to be braver in this area and also consider the conversion of brown sites in the centre of towns too.

Yes

ID sylw: 87053

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

Brown field sites should be developed first.

Yes

ID sylw: 87120

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Davinia Fisher

Brownfield should be used as priority before destroying Greenbelt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 87170

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Bryan Hay

Brownfield land is essentially a wasted resource, and must be utilised effectively before any Green Belt land is developed.

Yes

ID sylw: 87195

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr R M Boorman

Please do build on urban areas that have previously been developed and not on farm land. This is prime agricultural land which should not be lost to building development. We need to preserve some agricultural land to grow the crops for now and future generations. It is also beautiful green belt countryside with a rich variety of plant and animal species.

Yes

ID sylw: 87224

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Rusbridge

Seems sensible.

Yes

ID sylw: 87298

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Hewitt

We need to maximise house building.

Yes

ID sylw: 87381

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

ID sylw: 87565

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

ID sylw: 87660

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Enness

The policy should state that all available brownfield land should be consumed prior to other development going ahead.

Yes

ID sylw: 87716

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr justin kerridge

yes

Yes

ID sylw: 87859

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kim James

1. By prioritizing brownfield land for development is a positive step toward reducing pressure on greenfield sites and making efficient use of previously developed land.

2. Ensuring that brownfield sites outside urban areas are assessed for their sustainability aligns with the need for well-planned growth that supports infrastructure, services, and accessibility.

3. Plan proposals must be supported by robust infrastructure planning and service provision to avoid creating isolated or car-dependent communities.

Yes

ID sylw: 88048

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

I completely agree with using brownfield sites I am unsure as to why greenbelt has been put forward for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 88049

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Completely agree with developing brownfield sites so why are so many site options within the green belt!?

Yes

ID sylw: 88094

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: British Film Institute

Asiant : Ms Giulia Bunting

BFI is the UK’s lead organisation for film and the moving image. BFI’s storage facility at Lighthorne, established in 1978, forms an integral part of the BFI’s National Archive.
BFI is currently looking at options to expand its operations at the long-established brownfield site at Lighthorne.
Policy Direction 9 should enable existing brownfield sites in rural areas to be developed to enable the growth and expansion of businesses and operations, where appropriate, to support the appropriate expansion of all types of sustainable businesses.
This approach is supported by NPPF paragraphs 11, 85, 88(a), 89, and 124.

Yes

ID sylw: 88152

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

Brownfield development must be given a priority.

Other

ID sylw: 88296

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Tristram

Utilising existing brownfield sites must be the priority for development. These sites are unpopular with developers, due to the additional cost of clearing and construction, but they are often in the most suitable locations for housing and industry and can be developed to make use of existing infrastructure, without the need to encroach on valuable green spaces

Yes

ID sylw: 88348

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Beaumont

Good use of land which has previously been developed