No

ID sylw: 91743

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 91852

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hanno Kirner

We need to avoid losing more green belt so brownfield a lot more sensible

Yes

ID sylw: 91981

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James OShea

Brownfield first along with review and reduction in the Green Belt

Yes

ID sylw: 92042

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Oliver Grice

There are many opportunities to build on brownfield sites before green belt or agricultural land, avoiding urban sprawl and issues with roads etc. Walkable communities, close knit with good cycle and walkways, in addition to the previously discussed work on infrastructure has to be the right solution.

No

ID sylw: 92095

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robin Broughton

Not one blade of grass should be touched until all derelict and brownfield sites have been compulsorily purchased and developed.
The council should require all landowners unjustly enriched by planning permission to pay 80% of any profit made back to the council / constituents
They should also fine all developers who hold up traffic for more than 1 week in any development
Unrealistic? Other countries manage it

Yes

ID sylw: 92212

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

Absolutely - Brownfield land should always be used over greenfield space. This would protect our green spaces, which are essential for biodiversity, wildlife and nature and would prevent urban sprawl, and minimise the loss of landscape.

Yes

ID sylw: 92229

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Gibb

As long as it’s managed sensibly. The Conservatives were idiots.

Yes

ID sylw: 92235

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Sara Burney

Brownfield land should ALWAYS be first choice for redevelopment. This is the first sensible policy direction I've read in relation to this whole debacle.

Yes

ID sylw: 92347

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Wilkinson

Brownfield sites must be developed above all others.
Even if the area lacks infrastructure all efforts must be made to use the land for housing/employment by
providing required infrastructure and transport links to avoid using green land sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 92368

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Harbury Parish Council

It continues to be important to do this, and to re-use urban spaces in particular.

Yes

ID sylw: 92416

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Christine Slaughter

To protect from urban sprawl and loss of landscape, brownfield should always be considered before greenfield for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 92489

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Briggs

The key issue is how fully brownfield sites are used before resorting to green belt. The threshold for using green belt when brownfield sites are available must be extremely high.
Both the usability of brownfield sites and the suitability of green belt need to be considered. It is simply unacceptable to use sub-optimal green belt in preference to any brownfield site. For example, where green belt sites development contradict strategic objective 3 (active travel, inter alia) it would be intolerable to develop them when brownfield sites remain available.

Yes

ID sylw: 92565

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

Where appropriate development on brownfield sites or preferable option

Yes

ID sylw: 92615

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Phillip Johnson

I strongly agree that Brownfield Land should be used for new developments.

Yes

ID sylw: 92738

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mervyn Longford

There is a need to utilise all brownfield land to its maximum advantage in preference to greenfield land.

Yes

ID sylw: 92782

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Cheek

All brownfield sites should be identified and developed first leaving the greenbelt area alone !

Yes

ID sylw: 92808

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

Brownfield sites should always be considered first- this is far more sustainable. Once greenbelt land is developed the environmental and social value is permanently lost. Greenbelt protection is important in maintaining South Warwickshire's, character and heritage.

Yes

ID sylw: 92820

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr JAMES STEWART

Using brownfield sites for development is always the best choice. It protects communities from urban sprawl, preventing uncontrolled expansion that overwhelms infrastructure and damages the environment. Developing brownfield land ensures open spaces are preserved, maintaining green areas essential for biodiversity, recreation, and well-being. By focusing on previously developed sites, we can meet housing needs without sacrificing the countryside. This approach promotes sustainable growth while protecting vital landscapes for future generations.

Yes

ID sylw: 92880

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

I suspect this will encourage smaller developments scattering the incoming residents among the existing towns and villages. this is appropriate so long as local services and infrastructure can cope. I keep reading that the population is ageing and being close to amenities is particularly necessary if people are unable to drive.

Yes

ID sylw: 92977

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

I feel brownfield land should always used before considering green belt land as these can never be replaced once gone. We must protect the environment & prevent urban sprawl.

Other

ID sylw: 93081

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Martina Hunt

Brownfield land should always be used for development over green field sites as set out in the policy, for agricultural sustainability, protecting open landscapes and minimising urban sprawl. We need to revolutionise how we think about development in the UK and South Warwickshire could be an example of how best to do this in the long term.

Yes

ID sylw: 93173

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gordon Sharp

Brownfield sites should always be first choice.

Yes

ID sylw: 93182

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley

Brownfield land should always be considered before other types of land.

Yes

ID sylw: 93208

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr George Cowper

Makes sense

Yes

ID sylw: 93339

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

The local plan should strongly promote the use of brownfield land before greenfield sites, as greenfield should be preserved as far as possible.

Yes

ID sylw: 93445

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Teresa Hayes

Agree brownfield BEFORE Greenbelt must be a priority

Yes

ID sylw: 93486

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Denise Holroyde

Brownfield sites must be developed first

Yes

ID sylw: 93573

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

Absolutely the right place provide , schools health services and shops are available. There must be transport and suitable roads.

Yes

ID sylw: 93610

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bull

Brownfield sites should be prioritized before Green Field sites

Yes

ID sylw: 93660

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Claire STEWART

Developing brownfield sites is the most sustainable option. It prevents urban sprawl, avoiding unchecked expansion that strains infrastructure and harms the environment. By prioritizing brownfield land, we can preserve open spaces that support biodiversity, recreation, and community well-being. This approach allows us to meet housing demands without losing valuable countryside. Choosing brownfield development promotes responsible growth while safeguarding green areas for future generations.