Yes

ID sylw: 93709

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Archer

Tes because the infrastructure is often in place. However, I guess these sites are more expensive to make suitable for housing as they need to be de-contaminated which may bias the decisions to Greeen Field..

Yes

ID sylw: 93730

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr George Power

Absolutely, brown belt land should be always be considered before green belt. Destruction of local landscape and wildlife while suitable industrial wasteland is available is not acceptable.

Yes

ID sylw: 93794

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick District Green Party

-This local plan needs to very strongly promote use of urban brownfield land.
-There must be a commitment to focusing on building affordable housing in the cities and towns where the housing is needed and infrastructure exists.
-This approach aligns with the government’s decision to delete paragraph 130 of the NPPF, reflecting a policy shift towards prioritizing land efficiency and housing supply over strict adherence to existing local character considerations.

Other

ID sylw: 93801

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Zbigniew Franczuk

Brownfield land should always be built on first and urban sprawl should be avoided untill ALL brownfield land is built on

No

ID sylw: 93910

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carina Taylor

Brownfield land should be used to develop new job opportunities, encouraging new companies to invest in the area.

Yes

ID sylw: 93984

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Scurrah

-

Yes

ID sylw: 94053

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stuart Mace

There is a glut of brownfield land now, and as habits change also in the future. Retail space is becoming increasingly redundant due to changes in consumer habits. Office spaces are now very different from the 1970s and 1980s when those buildings were first built, and indeed those buildings are of poor design and poor quality.

No

ID sylw: 94087

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

The green belt should always be protected for development and especially where there are brownfield sites readily available.

Yes

ID sylw: 94111

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kelly

Brownfield Land should always be used for development over green belt land as set out in the policy for the importance of protecting from urban sprawl and the loss of open landscape.

Other

ID sylw: 94249

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew Close

I'm not clear on 'Spatial Growth Strategy priority areas 1-3' within this policy and how it relates to the 24+12 strategic sites? Does SWLP need a policy for brownfield given national requirements to reuse such land for development first. To help with the intent behind policy direction 9, do you have a sense of the amount of land to be utilised and housing it could deliver? Density within town centres should be increased, however to note the new Grey Belt criteria for 'previously developed land' aka brownfield, which could mean locations that are less sustainable may be earmarked by developers.

Yes

ID sylw: 94330

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Waters

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 94392

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Blandamer

Brownfield land should always be used for development over green belt land as set out in the policy for the importance of protecting against the loss of open landscape and preventing urban sprawl.

Yes

ID sylw: 94393

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: James Springate

Brown Field MUST be considered for development before destroying countryside areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 94486

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Isabel Collins

brownfield should always be used over greenbelt to protect the land

Yes

ID sylw: 94502

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Clement Silverman

I would like to see greater funding and support of brownfield development, particularly where sites may be more 'difficult' to develop over greenfield. e.g. Developers could be put off by having to clear derelict buildings or work within constraints, and therefore extra intensives may be needed to realise the benefits.

Yes

ID sylw: 94514

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carol Clark

Using Brownfield Land first is preferable to using Green Belt or other open areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 94572

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

N/A

No

ID sylw: 94676

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Gala McBride

B1 land in Hatton
All 3 recent huge housing developments affecting the A4117 and the vicinity have been on virgin greenfield sites. Part of the proposed development is a conservation area and it is all Green Belt. Please please find brownfield sites instead. We need open country, woods and wildlife to combat climate change - we have lost so much green land in this area already. We need the biodiversity of our green land to sustain health and happiness. For example, on our precious canal and its surroundings, we have otters, kingfishers, water voles, cormorants, herons and many deer.

Yes

ID sylw: 94688

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Dunster

It make far more sense to me to use ALL 'Brownfield' sites until they are fully utilised and only then consider other sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 94758

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Jackson

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 94796

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

no further comment

Yes

ID sylw: 94835

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 94922

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Brownfield land shou;d always be used before Greenbelt land. As council policies to pretect from urban sprawl and the loss of open landscape wherever possible.

Yes

ID sylw: 94964

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Grimes

I have no objection to brownfield sites being re-developed as long as green belt sites are left as green belt, and in addition there would generally have been infrastructure in place for a brownfield site, rather than having to create a whole new infrastructure on green belt.

Yes

ID sylw: 95022

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Alice Taylor

We strongly agree with this approach. Brownfield sites should always be prioritised for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 95209

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Wilson

Brownfield sites are far preferable.

Yes

ID sylw: 95281

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

It feels obvious that use of brownfield land should be prioritized. once you bulldoze countryside unnecessarily then obviously it is gone forever.

Yes

ID sylw: 95358

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Guy Vellacott

Brownfield sites should be used ahead of destroying arable land

Yes

ID sylw: 95448

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Goodman

Brownfield sites should always be used for development in preference to Green belt land

Yes

ID sylw: 95518

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dave Maxted

Brown field sites should be developed before considering any building on green belt land.