Yes

ID sylw: 95558

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Allan Stewart

Brownfield sites should be a priority.

Yes

ID sylw: 95575

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Redhead

The use of brownfield sites for development must be a priority, to protect green belt and unmolested nature sites for future generations.

Other

ID sylw: 95598

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

Using brownfield land is always preferable for development than using green belt land. It would protect from urban sprawl and loss of open countryside.

Yes

ID sylw: 95645

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Clare Shales

to reduce the need to encroach on to true greenbelt.

No

ID sylw: 95675

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Waterhouse

N/A

No

ID sylw: 95678

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Waterhouse

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 95687

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

Makes sense

Yes

ID sylw: 95845

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

Brownfield land should always be used for development over green belt land

Yes

ID sylw: 95911

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

agreed

Yes

ID sylw: 96049

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

As an absolute priority provide the infrastructure supports the proposed use.

Yes

ID sylw: 96099

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 96237

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Brownfield Land should always be used for development over green
belt land as set out in the policy for the importance of protecting from urban sprawl and the loss of open landscape.

Yes

ID sylw: 96271

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Coughlan

Using brown fill land is a preference to green belt which should be preserved.

Yes

ID sylw: 96301

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

ID sylw: 96446

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Julie Springate

Brown field MUST be considered for development before destroying countryside areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 96569

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Agreed

Yes

ID sylw: 96636

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Griffin

The opportunity to use Brownfield sites should have been addressed years ago. These could be affordable solutions and should be a priority rather than new sites

Yes

ID sylw: 96644

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Griffith

I support brown field development first at all times. As part of this process consideration must be made to ensure that as brown field site arise they ther is a coordinated approach.
Ie Western Road in Stratford is key residential area close to communities. Areas must be made available to house the car showroom elsewhere in a planned approach. Garages can be on the out of town.
Stratford Hospital expansion would fall under the same heading.
This is just one issue of potential residential sites that counld be released.

Yes

ID sylw: 96648

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

No comment

Yes

ID sylw: 96699

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs G Wood

Using Brownfield sites makes use of otherwise spoilt land and therefore make practical use of land which may be otherwise wasted. Moreover it saves Greenfield land .

Yes

ID sylw: 96707

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Gee

no further comment

Yes

ID sylw: 96836

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) strongly supports the Policy Direction in that it requires brownfield land to be developed first. This correctly follows NPPF para 124.

Yes

ID sylw: 96934

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

It is much more eco friendly to use Brownfield Land

Yes

ID sylw: 97034

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Morris

Brownfield land should always be preferable for development over greenbelt land to prevent urban sprawl, protect our landscape and our wildlife!

Yes

ID sylw: 97044

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Victoria Alcock

This should be the only proposal. Green belt should not be used

Yes

ID sylw: 97055

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs R Douce

The regeneration of brown field sites should take priority over building on green belt land and should be used to provide high quality, well designed dwellings that meet the needs of a range of house buyers. Brown field sites can also make full use of existing infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 97120

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 97289

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Lewin

Yes, by law, brownfield sites must be used first. I understand that this Plan has more than sufficient land to meet its needs without building on green belt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 97308

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bernard Davis

n/a

Yes

ID sylw: 97324

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy White

I agree that brownfield sites should always take precedent over greenfield sites