Other

ID sylw: 106711

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Raymond Randerson

Asiant : Sworders

Policy Direction 10 should provide the policy context which enables developments to come forward in a range of settlements, including smaller settlements without settlement boundaries, such as Avon Dassett, which provide a mix of affordable and market housing. This would provide an incentive to developers to bring sites forward, ensures the viability of development proposals and provides a mix of housing to meet an identified requirement. The proposed development of our client’s site at Avon Dassett seeks to seeks to provide residential development. It is suitable for market units, self-build/ custom build units and/ or to meet the local housing need. This strategy also increases the flexibility of the Plan to ensure consistent housing delivery in changing circumstances and avoids the issue of over reliance on significant infrastructure provision before housing can be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 106719

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Maureen Randerson

Policy Direction 10 should provide the policy context which enables developments to come forward in a range of settlements, including smaller settlements without settlement boundaries, such as Avon Dassett, which provide a mix of affordable and market housing. This would provide an incentive to developers to bring sites forward, ensures the viability of development proposals and provides a mix of housing to meet an identified requirement. The proposed development of our client’s site at Avon Dassett seeks to seeks to provide residential development. It is suitable for market units, self-build/ custom build units and/ or to meet the local housing need. This strategy also increases the flexibility of the Plan to ensure consistent housing delivery in changing circumstances and avoids the issue of over reliance on significant infrastructure provision before housing can be delivered.

Yes

ID sylw: 106802

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mackenzie Miller Developments Ltd

Asiant : Morgan Elliot Planning

Generally, MMH is supportive of the Draft Policy B but would like to highlight to the SWCs that the policy could be strengthened. It is suggested that offering flexibility to respond to local circumstances and providing clarity on what happens if SBCH plots are marketed but receive no interest. It should be noted that other LPAs have included provisions allowing SBCH plots to revert to affordable or general housing if there is no interest after 12 months.
Sites such as land at Arden Heath, Stratford could accommodate custom and self-build homes, demonstrating the potential for SBCH in various locations and as such MMH is supportive of the Draft Policy B. Comments on Windfall .
MMH strongly considers that the SWC’s must provide robust evidence to justify the proposed windfall rate of 375 dwellings per annum. This evidence should include historical data on windfall site delivery and an analysis of future trends to ensure the rate is realistic and achievable.

Other

ID sylw: 107007

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Davies

Asiant : Sworders

Policy Direction 10 should provide the policy context which enables developments to come forward in a range of settlements, including smaller settlements without settlement boundaries. This would provide an incentive to developers to bring sites forward, ensures the viability of development proposals and provides a mix of housing to meet an identified requirement. The proposed development of our client’s site seeks to seeks to provide residential development. It is suitable for market units, self-build/ custom build units and/ or to meet the local housing need. This strategy also increases the flexibility of the Plan to ensure consistent housing delivery in changing circumstances and avoids the issue of an over reliance on significant infrastructure provision before housing can be delivered.

Yes

ID sylw: 107074

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswolds National Landscape Board

Support

Other

ID sylw: 107121

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Marvelly

Asiant : Sworders

Policy Direction 10 should provide the policy context which enables developments to come forward in a range of settlements, including smaller settlements without settlement boundaries. This would provide an incentive to developers to bring sites forward, ensures the viability of development proposals and provides a mix of housing to meet an identified requirement. The proposed development of our client’s site seeks to seeks to provide residential development. It is suitable for market units, self-build/ custom build units and/ or to meet the local housing need. This strategy also increases the flexibility of the Plan to ensure consistent housing delivery in changing circumstances and avoids the issue of an over reliance on significant infrastructure provision before housing can be delivered.

Yes

ID sylw: 107216

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Mr Will Whitelock

We agree with the general approach for the provision custom and self-build housing plots in order help to diversify the housing market and increase consumer choice in accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Framework.
A draft SWLP policy requirement for 5% of the developable area for large developments (100 or more dwellings) to be made available for the provision of self-build and custom-build homes, may lead to an over-supply of this housing tenure - far greater than the level of need identified on the Council’s Register for the past few years. Therefore, greater flexibility is required in the policy wording to enable a fall-back option if the Council Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding Position Statement indicates that there is already a sufficient supply of plots to meet the demand for this specific type of housing.
In addition, it is considered that people wishing to commission or build their own homes may have a preference for large plots within and adjacent to smaller settlements, including small villages, as evidenced by the entries on the Council’s self-build register. Serviced plots within large housing developments may therefore be unattractive to these consumers. Further evidence is required to justify the policy approach of locating self-build plots within large development sites.
We agree with the inclusion of the fall-back option of reverting any unsold self-build plots to the developer to build, should any of these plots not be sold after an appropriate marketing period (12 months).

Yes

ID sylw: 107268

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswolds National Landscape Board

Yes, the Cotswolds National Landscape (CNL) Board agrees with the approach laid out in Draft Policy B.
In particular, we support the following requirement relating to unallocated self-build and custom build housing:
•Suitable sites within the … Cotswolds National Landscape and adjacent to defined settlement boundaries would only be supported to meet a local need identified by the local community.

Yes

ID sylw: 107449

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Moreton Morrell Parish Council

In principle support the proposals for providing custom and self-building housing plots

No

ID sylw: 107525

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Davidsons Homes

Asiant : Cerda Planning Ltd

We object in principle to this policy.
Self-build plots meets a specific need within the SWLP area, and it is appropriate to plan for the delivery of self-build properties, however the provision of 5% of all sites of 100 houses or more is a wholly unacceptable approach to delivering on need.
Self-build plots set within spatial growth sites will result in sites becoming piecemeal, it will be more challenging to first development and then implement Design Coding, our experience is that self-build demand is low where such plots are set within a much larger strategic scale development, the servicing of individual plots becomes problematic, and given the inherent risk associated with the set aside and delivery of self-build plots it makes the commitment to infrastructure and delivery of homes in accordance with the trajectory more difficult.
The alternative approach is for the SWLP to expressly allocate sites specifically for the delivery of self-build plots and no other purposes. In this way Design Codes can be prepared reflective of the specifics of the delivery of self-build plots, planning permissions can be granted with site specific conditions and obligations which are bespoke to the nature of self-building, and infrastructure requirements and delivery triggers drafted in a manner reflective of the timing issues around self-build delivery.

Other

ID sylw: 107630

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Napton Parish Council

Custom and Self Build Housing Plots
We largely agree with the approach laid out in the approach in the Draft Policy but strongly disagree with some important details that have been found problematic.

The policy should expect plots to be adjacent to the BUAB and avoid sites with multiple plots protruding into open countryside extending the BUAB.

‘Small-scale’ requires numerical guidance.

Caution should be applied with design codes. It is better to rely on reserved matter applications rather than assumed or blanket approval through a design code.

We welcome the policy to require effective re-marketing after 12 months, but question how enforceable this can be and when the ‘clock starts’. There appears to have been a history of plots being built speculatively under the guise of CSB and then finding their way into the open market. Best practice elsewhere should be benchmarked for precise wording.

No

ID sylw: 107741

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land

Asiant : Savills

We object to the proposed requirement development sites of over 100 dwellings to deliver 5% self-build and custom-build plots. There is no evidence to justify the requirements for allocating a percentage of plots on sites to provide custom-self build and whether there is a projected need to identify this level of provision. There is also no specific requirement in the PPG (reference 57-025-20210508) to require allocated sites to deliver self and custom build plots.
We are aware that Stratford on Avon District Council produce an annual position statement (December 2024) which sets out the demand for Self-build and Custom Housebuilding. The demand in Warwick District differs to the demand in Stratford District, therefore we object to the blanket approach of 5% for all developments of more than 100 dwellings. We consider that the LPAs should continue with the approach which provides overall support for self-custom build development but leaves it to the housing market to deliver plots when demands arises or allocate specific sites to deliver self and custom built plots to meet identified need where evidenced.

No

ID sylw: 107790

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes

Asiant : Savills

We object to the proposed requirement development sites of over 100 dwellings to deliver 5% self-build and custom-build plots. There is no evidence to justify the requirements for allocating a percentage of plots on sites to provide custom-self build and whether there is a projected need to identify this level of provision. There is also no specific requirement in the PPG (reference 57-025-20210508) to require allocated sites to deliver self and custom build plots.
We are aware that Stratford on Avon District Council produce an annual position statement (December 2024) which sets out the demand for Self-build and Custom Housebuilding. The demand in Warwick District differs to the demand in Stratford District, therefore we object to the blanket approach of 5% for all developments of more than 100 dwellings. We consider that the LPAs should continue with the approach which provides overall support for self-custom build development but leaves it to the housing market to deliver plots when demands arises or allocate specific sites to deliver self and custom built plots to meet identified need where evidenced.

Other

ID sylw: 107831

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Self Build & Custom Housebuilding Register had 345 people on it as of 31st March 2024. Warwick’s Register had 95 people on it as of 2019, which is the latest published position. Table 13.1 of the HEDNA identifies that serviced plot demand for self-build dwellings is 63 plots per annum. Evidence exists to suggest a need for custom and self-build plots, and we therefore support in principle a policy relating to delivery of such plots, although the evidence needs to be refreshed.

The policy should be amended to provide flexibility rather than a 5% of developable area on schemes over 99 dwellings. There will also be separate self-build allocations and windfall sites. Areas should not be sterilised and prevented from delivering other forms of housing to contribute towards meeting a different need which may be more appropriate and with more demand in the area. There could be reference to a trigger for releasing self-build plots on sites where there is no demand for them.

Other

ID sylw: 107907

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: TERRA

Asiant : Lichfields (Birmingham)

As a part of the PO, the SWAs have recognised a need to ensure provision for self-build and
custom housebuilding (“SBCH”) is made over the plan period to meet their needs, with
Draft Policy B (Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots) requiring all large
developments (100 or more dwellings) to make provision for SBCH on 5% of the
developable area of a site.
2.97 This, although not explicitly stated in the PO, appears to be underpinned by the HEDNA,
which sets out evidence regarding the need for SBCH plots based on the individuals who
have expressed demand for serviced plots since 1st April 2016. The HEDNA, in Table 13.1,
identified an annual average need of 38 and 93 SBCH plots in Stratford-on-Avon and
Warwick respectively. Extrapolated over the plan period, this would equate to a need for
3,275 SBCH plots. In general, this would equate to c.5% of the SWA’s housing need over the
plan period.
2.98 Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, the SWAs should also assess and reflect in policy the need for
(inter alia) people wishing to commission or build their own homes. The PPG is also clear that there are several measures which can be used to do this, including but not limited to
encouraging developers to consider making provisions for SBCH.10
2.99 Whilst supportive in principle, Terra has some concerns regarding the SWA’s proposed
approach to delivering SBCH. In particular, Terra is concerned that there is no evidence
which explains the 100-dwelling threshold, or 5% requirement set out within the policy. As
noted above, the NPPF is clear that plans should underpinned by relevant and up-to-date
evidence that is adequate, proportionate and focused tightly on supporting and justifying
the policies concerned (Para 32). Whilst Terra recognises the ‘demand’ would broadly align
with the 5% requirement, the SWAs must demonstrate how the 100-dwelling threshold and
5% requirement align with the identified need.
2.100 Terra is also concerned that the policy as drafted applies SWLP-wide and offers no
flexibility to respond to local circumstances. Whilst there is evidence of a need for self-build
plots across SWLP-area, this does not automatically mean that there is demand in every
location. Terra therefore considers that further evidence is needed which justifies the policy
applying SWLP-wide.
2.101 Finally, whilst the draft policy requires a marketing strategy for the plots, Terra notes that
the draft policy provides no clarity in circumstances where the SBCH properties have been
marketed but received no interest. Policies must be sufficiently flexible, fit for purpose and
be clearly written and unambiguous (Para 16d). To this end, Terra considers that the policy
should provide clarity as to the approach the SWAs will take if the plots are marketed
unsuccessfully. By way of example, other LPAs have included caveats within similar policies
that have enabled the SBCH plots to revert back to affordable or general housing if there is
a lack of interest after 12 months.

Other

ID sylw: 107949

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rainier Developments Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Self Build & Custom Housebuilding Register had 345 people on it as of 31st March 2024. Warwick’s Register had 95 people on it as of 2019, which is the latest published position. Table 13.1 of the HEDNA identifies that serviced plot demand for self-build dwellings is 63 plots per annum. Evidence exists to suggest a need for custom and self-build plots, and we therefore support in principle a policy relating to delivery of such plots, although the evidence needs to be refreshed.

The policy should be amended to provide flexibility rather than a 5% of developable area on schemes over 99 dwellings. There will also be separate self-build allocations and windfall sites. Areas should not be sterilised and prevented from delivering other forms of housing to contribute towards meeting a different need which may be more appropriate and with more demand in the area. There could be reference to a trigger for releasing self-build plots on sites where there is no demand for them.

Other

ID sylw: 108070

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Seven Homes

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Self Build & Custom Housebuilding Register had 345 people on it as of 31st March 2024. Warwick’s Register had 95 people on it as of 2019, which is the latest published position. Table 13.1 of the HEDNA identifies that serviced plot demand for self-build dwellings is 63 plots per annum. Evidence exists to suggest a need for custom and self-build plots, and we therefore support in principle a policy relating to delivery of such plots, although the evidence needs to be refreshed.

The policy should be amended to provide flexibility rather than a 5% of developable area on schemes over 99 dwellings. There will also be separate self-build allocations and windfall sites. Areas should not be sterilised and prevented from delivering other forms of housing to contribute towards meeting a different need which may be more appropriate and with more demand in the area. There could be reference to a trigger for releasing self-build plots on sites where there is no demand for them.

No

ID sylw: 108180

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes (West Midlands)

Asiant : Cerda Planning

We object in principle to this policy.
Self-build plots meets a specific need within the SWLP area, and it is appropriate to plan for the delivery of self-build properties, however the provision of 5% of all sites of 100 houses or more is a wholly unacceptable approach to delivering on need.
Self-build plots set within spatial growth sites will result in sites becoming piecemeal, it will be more challenging to first development and then implement Design Coding, our experience is that self-build demand is low where such plots are set within a much larger strategic scale development, the servicing of individual plots becomes problematic, and given the inherent risk associated with the set aside and delivery of self-build plots it makes the commitment to infrastructure more difficult.
The alternative approach is for the SWLP to expressly allocate sites specifically for the delivery of self-build plots and no other purposes. In this way Design Codes can be prepared reflective of the specifics of the delivery of self-build plots, planning permissions can be granted with site specific conditions and obligations which are bespoke to the nature of self-building, and infrastructure requirements and delivery triggers drafted in a manner reflective of the timing issues around self-build delivery.

Other

ID sylw: 108194

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: St Philips

Asiant : Lichfields (Birmingham)

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots? 2.82 As a part of the PO, the SWAs have recognised a need to ensure provision for self-build and custom housebuilding (“SBCH”) is made over the plan period to meet their needs, with Draft Policy B (Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots) requiring all large developments (100 or more dwellings) to make provision for SBCH on 5% of the developable area of a site. 2.83 This, although not explicitly stated in the PO, appears to be underpinned by the HEDNA, which sets out evidence regarding the need for SBCH plots based on the individuals who have expressed demand for serviced plots since 1st April 2016. The HEDNA, in Table 13.1, identified an annual average need of 38 and 93 SBCH plots in Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick respectively. Extrapolated over the plan period, this would equate to a need for 3,275 SBCH plots. In general, this would equate to c.5% of the SWA’s housing need over the plan period. 2.84 Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, the SWAs should also assess and reflect in policy the need for (inter alia) people wishing to commission or build their own homes. The PPG is also clear that there are several measures which can be used to do this, including but not limited to encouraging developers to consider making provisions for SBCH.11 2.85 Whilst supportive in principle, St Philips has some concerns regarding the SWA’s proposed approach to delivering SBCH. In particular, St Philips is concerned that there is no evidence that explains the 100-dwelling threshold, or 5% requirement set out within the policy. As noted above, the NPPF is clear that plans should underpinned by relevant and up-to-date evidence that is adequate, proportionate and focused tightly on supporting and justifying the policies concerned (Para 32). Whilst St Philips recognises the ‘demand’ would broadly align with the 5% requirement, the SWAs must demonstrate how the 100-dwelling threshold and 5% requirement align with the identified need. 2.86 In addition, the NPPF is also clear that planning policies should have regard to the economic viability of sites (Para 72) and should not undermine the deliverability of the Local Plan (Para 35). To this end, the SWLP will need to be supported by a viability assessment that cumulatively tests the impact of policy requirements on the viability of sites allocated in the SWLP – including the impact of requiring delivering SBCH if these approaches are proposed. 2.87 St Philips is also concerned that the policy as drafted applies SWLP-wide and offers no flexibility to respond to local circumstances. Whilst there is evidence of a need for self-build plots across SWLP-area, this does not automatically mean that there is demand in every location. St Philips therefore considers that further evidence is needed to justify the policy applying SWLP-wide. 2.88 Finally, whilst the draft policy requires a marketing strategy for the plots, St Philips notes that the draft policy provides no clarity in circumstances where the SBCH properties have been marketed but received no interest. Policies must be sufficiently flexible, fit for purpose and be clearly written and unambiguous (Para 16d). To this end, St Philips considers that the policy should provide clarity as to the approach the SWAs will take if the plots are marketed unsuccessfully. By way of example, other LPAs have included caveats within similar policies that have enabled the SBCH plots to revert back to affordable or general housing if there is a lack of interest after 12 months.

No

ID sylw: 108214

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Persimmon Homes (South Midlands)

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Evidence exists, though it needs to be refreshed, to suggest that there is a need for custom and self-build plots within South Warwickshire, and as such a policy relating to the delivery of such plots would be justified and supported in principle.

The policy states that 5% of the developable area of a site must be made available for custom and self-build on schemes comprising 100 dwellings or more. It is considered that this should be amended to provide flexibility; self-build plots should be delivered in line with the identified need, and provision will be made elsewhere, as noted in the policy, on allocated self-build sites, and windfall sites too. It is important to note that other types of housing need must equally be met within South Warwickshire, and areas of sites should not be sterilised and prevented from delivering other forms of housing which will contribute towards meeting a different need, in a location which may be more appropriate for this than for self-build, or for which there may be a greater demand. Reference could be made to a trigger for the release of self-build plots if there is no demand for these.

No

ID sylw: 108280

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Spitfire Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

No. We support the section of Draft Policy B that facilitates self-build and custom build housing on unallocated sites, however, we do not support the proposal that 5% of all plots on large housing sites are made available for custom and self-build homes.
The potential new settlement allocations in the Plan will deliver over 6,000 dwellings. If a site of this size is expected to provide 5% custom and self-build provision this means that 300 self-build and custom-build plots will be required in single locations. There is no evidence to suggest that there is this level of demand for self and custom-build plots in such large clusters.
There is no evidence to justify the requirements for 5% provision. In order for this requirement to remain in Policy robust evidence must be provided explaining how the 5% requirement has been established and how this relates to identified demand. In this regard, it is noted that the Stratford Upon Avon District Council self-build and custom-build position statement (December 2024) advises that at 30th October 2024 there was a surplus of 18 self-build plots. Whilst there is an identified need for further 116 self-build plots by 2027, this is a relatively insignificant amount compared to the number of self-build and custom-build plots that can be generated by draft Policy D.
In addition, households seeking custom and self-build plots are, in our experience, unlikely to be attracted to individual plots in new build housing estates. Typically, they prefer self build and custom plots in and around the age of settlements. Unless the Councils can evidence specific demand for plots within large scale developments of this nature, it should not be included within the Policy.
It should also be noted that the introduction of a 5% self-build plots policy will, in all likelihood, have a direct impact on densities as typically self-build plots are larger than normal development plots.

No

ID sylw: 108316

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: CEG Land Promotion III (UK) Limited and Mixed Farms

Asiant : Nexus Planning

CEG and Mixed Farms consider that whilst a variety of new homes are supported, to meet the needs of different
groups of the community in accordance with paragraph 62 of the NPPF, further evidence around need and
viability should be presented at future plan-making stages should South Warwickshire wish to implement a policy
requirement for self and custom build housing on allocated sites. Draft Policy B sets out that 5% of the
developable area of the site should be made available to self and custom build housing, however this is not
grounded in evidence at this time and it is unlikely that 5% of all large sites to be allocated will be supported by
the demand when considering the Council’s self-build register from 2015/15 and committed supply.

Other

ID sylw: 108321

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: George Martin

Regretfully to date the two authorities Custom and Self Build Registers are not advertised and made known to the public. In order to assess the demand there needs to be a marketing process which currently is non existent. Agree that all plots should be offered first to individuals or households with a local connection. Gas should not be provided by the developer as part of the requirement for plots to be 'fully serviced'. Log burners should not be permitted in these properties.

Hopefully the design code will rule out the ‘anywhere’ house types currently provided by the current developers.

In terms of site-specific considerations, all good with the exception of time scale. Currently in Kenilworth development has been taking place for some 2 years and there are as yet no serviced plots available we are told until circa 2027. There should be an ongoing supply available each year.

Other

ID sylw: 108371

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mackenzie Miller Homes

Asiant : Lichfields (Birmingham)

11.1 The SWCs have identified the need to accommodate self-build and custom housebuilding
[SBCH] throughout the plan period to meet demand. Draft Policy B requires that all large
developments (100+ dwellings) allocate 5% of the developable area for SBCH.
11.2 Whilst not explicitly stated in the PO, the HEDNA provides evidence of the need for SBCH
plots, showing an annual average need of 38 and 93 plots in Stratford-on-Avon and
Warwick, respectively. Over the plan period, 3,275 SBCH plots are needed, equating to
about 5% of the SWC’s housing need.
11.3 The NPPF Paragraph 63 and PPG 7emphasise the importance of assessing and reflecting the
need for self-build homes in policy. However, Mackenzie Miller Homes has concerns about
the lack of evidence for the 100 dwelling threshold and 5% requirement. Mackenzie Miller
Homes believes that policies should be based on up-to-date evidence and consider the
economic viability of sites.
11.4 Generally, Mackenzie Miller Homes is supportive of the Draft Policy B but would like to
highlight to the SWCs that the policy could be strengthened. It is suggested that offering
flexibility to respond to local circumstances and providing clarity on what happens if SBCH
plots are marketed but receive no interest. It should be noted that other LPAs have included
provisions allowing SBCH plots to revert to affordable or general housing if there is no
interest after 12 months.
11.5 Sites such as land at Fell Mill and Leasow Farm in Shipston-on-Stour could accommodate
custom and self-build homes, demonstrating the potential for SBCH in various locations
and as such Mackenzie Miller Homes is supportive of the Draft Policy B.

No

ID sylw: 108414

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: The Kler Group

Asiant : Cerda Planning Ltd

We object in principle to this policy.

Self build plots meets a specific need within the SWLP area, and it is appropriate to plan for the delivery of self build properties, however the provision of 5% of all sites of 100 houses or more is a wholly unacceptable approach to delivering on need.

Self build plots set within spatial growth sites will result in sites becoming piecemeal, it will be more challenging to first development and then implement Design Coding. The alternative approach is for the SWLP to expressly allocate sites specifically for the delivery of self build plots and no other purposes.

No

ID sylw: 108445

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr R Wilding

Asiant : Cerda Planning Ltd

We object in principle to this policy.

Self build plots meets a specific need within the SWLP area, and it is appropriate to plan for the delivery of self build properties, however the provision of 5% of all sites of 100 houses or more is a wholly unacceptable approach to delivering on need.

Self build plots set within spatial growth sites will result in sites becoming piecemeal, it will be more challenging to first development and then implement Design Coding. The alternative approach is for the SWLP to expressly allocate sites specifically for the delivery of self build plots and no other purposes.

Other

ID sylw: 108512

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: The Bird Group

Asiant : Framptons

The Bird Group agree with the general approach for the provision custom and self-build housing plots in order help to diversify the housing market and increase consumer choice in accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Framework.
A draft SWLP policy requirement for 5% of the developable area for large developments (100 or more dwellings) to be made available for the provision of self-build and custom-build homes, may lead to an over-supply of this housing tenure - far greater than the level of need identified on the Council’s Register for the past few years. Therefore, greater flexibility is required in the policy wording to enable a fall-back option if the Council’s Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding Position Statement indicates that there is already a sufficient supply of plots to meet the demand for this specific type of housing.
We agree with the inclusion of the fall-back option of reverting any unsold self-build plots to the developer to build, should any of these plots not be sold after an appropriate marketing period (12 months).

No

ID sylw: 108572

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Evidence exists, though it needs to be refreshed, to suggest that there is a need for custom and self-build plots within South Warwickshire, and as such a policy relating to the delivery of such plots would be justified and supported in principle.

The policy states that 5% of the developable area of a site must be made available for custom and self-build on schemes comprising 100 dwellings or more. It is considered that this should be amended to provide flexibility; self-build plots should be delivered in line with the identified need, and provision will be made elsewhere, as noted in the policy, on allocated self-build sites, and windfall sites too. It is important to note that other types of housing need must equally be met within South Warwickshire, and areas of sites should not be sterilised and prevented from delivering other forms of housing which will contribute towards meeting a different need, in a location which may be more appropriate for this than for self-build, or for which there may be a greater demand. Reference could be made to a trigger for the release of self-build plots if there is no demand for these.

Other

ID sylw: 108620

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kiely Bros Holdings Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Draft Policy B – Providing Custom and Self-Building Housing Plots
5.12.
As set out in the PPG (Paragraph: 016 Reference ID: 57-016- 20210208), The Self-build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015 (as amended by the Housing and Planning Act 2016) sets out the legal definition of self-build and custom housebuilding, and also sets out the requirement for each relevant authority to keep a register and publicise the register.
Furthermore, self-build or custom build will help diversify the housing market, as per PPG §16a Reference ID: 57-016a-20210208.
5.13.
With regards to demand for self-build, Stratford’s Self Build & Custom Housebuilding Register had 345 people on it as of 31st March 2024. Warwick’s Register had 95 people on it as of 2019, which is the latest published position. Table 13.1 of the HEDNA identifies that serviced plot demand for self-build dwellings is 63 plots per annum. Evidence thus exists, though it needs to be refreshed, to suggest that there is a need for custom and self-build plots within South Warwickshire, and as such a policy relating to the delivery of such plots would be justified and supported in principle.
5.14.
The policy states that 5% of the developable area of a site must be made available for custom and self-build on schemes comprising 100 dwellings or more. It is considered that this should be amended to provide flexibility; self-build plots should be delivered in line with the identified need, and provision will be made elsewhere, as noted in the policy, on allocated self-build sites, and windfall sites too. It is important to note that other types of housing need must equally be met within South Warwickshire, and areas of sites should not be sterilised and prevented from delivering other forms of housing which will contribute towards meeting a different need, in a location which may be more appropriate for this than for self-build, or for which there may be a greater demand. Reference could be made to a trigger for the release of self-build plots if there is no demand for these. Whilst the delivery of self-build plots as part of larger schemes should be encouraged, providing that evidence underpins this, it should not be a fixed requirement.