No

ID sylw: 85987

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Rebecca England

Money should be invested elsewhere

No

ID sylw: 85998

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sian Corrie

There are an increasing number of 'illegal' Gypsie Traveler' sites appearing, these are constructed without planning consent and are frequently permitted following retrospective planning applications and appeals. This causes a lot of concern. A review of all existing sites should be taken into consideration when considering future needs.

Yes

ID sylw: 86006

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kate Harris

Increasing numbers of people are choosing to live in a transient manner (canals/roads) rather than living in a fixed location so housing policy needs to respond to this changing need

No

ID sylw: 86067

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 86138

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Corrie

(Some communities) appear to be able to circumnavigate existing planning laws by purchasing land and constructing sites at will and obtaining retrospective planning consent.

No

ID sylw: 86406

Derbyniwyd: 23/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Chennells

Identification of the need for this to happen in the Kenilworth proposals needs identifying to the local community as our roads and provision will not accommodate their needs
I appreciate they need somewhere to live but it should be away from new housing estates with good road access and a high level of support for residents

No

ID sylw: 86650

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Option 6c is the only reasonable and fair option. All people should be treated fairly, and on the face of it equally. This also requires all people to participate and be responsible for their part on society. No group of people should have beneficial treatment as a matter of course.

Yes

ID sylw: 86747

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Dane

No further comment

Other

ID sylw: 86839

Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rebecca Fossett

You have just given planning on a circus winter quarters outside Stratford so hardly safeguarding existing sites. Showmen and gypsies needs are completely different and culturally they have no connection. You should not be creating one site at Harbury for both communities. It would cause problems.

No

ID sylw: 86908

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Don't agree with any further new development

No

ID sylw: 87014

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

Given the experience residents of kenilworth have had with gypsie travellers, more attention needs to be given to the cultural support of local communities first.

Yes

ID sylw: 87386

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

No

ID sylw: 87569

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I do not agree

Yes

ID sylw: 87706

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kathrin Foster

n/a

No

ID sylw: 87811

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Godson

The proposal fails to adequately address the integration of Gypsy, Traveller, and Travelling Showpeople accommodation into wider communities. While safeguarding existing sites is important, the approach of requiring large developments to provide small-scale sites on the edge of developments could segregate these communities and hinder integration. The lack of emphasis on accessible facilities, such as healthcare and education for these groups, undermines the intention of providing sustainable living.

Yes

ID sylw: 88029

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steve Taylor

Support but allocation of boat moorings should be increased substantially.

Yes

ID sylw: 88091

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Durk

There will be too many people saying that they don't want travellers anywhere near them. Sites MUST be preserved for these people.

No

ID sylw: 88400

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Maurice Stokes

Gypsies, traveller and show persons community do not need any further areas (Redacted text) . If such areas where to be made available to prevent illegal occupation fair and market value charges should be administered.

Yes

ID sylw: 88562

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

We have for too long failed to meet or obligations here.

No

ID sylw: 88663

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Large Strategic sites should be selected for Travellers / Gypsies etc around the UK and not scattered small sites. I live in an area that within 8 miles there are 3 traveller sites. Why could not strategic site be selected. (Redacted Text) Large scale traveller sites should be identified and existing smaller scattered sites closed (redacted text).

No

ID sylw: 88743

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Lane

Local experience is that Travellers buy land through concealed, third parties and occupy it without any planning permission or local facilities. The Local Authority is then left with the cost of evicting them or treating them as a special case for post occupation planning permission in a way that is distinctly unfair to law abiding citizens who follow the rules. The approach for this community needs to balance the provision of appropriate sites with planning permission and facilities for healthy living and minimal disruption of neighbours with rapid and not prolonged enforcement of the planning laws.

Other

ID sylw: 88756

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

Provision needs to be made for waste and recycling as site can frequently become an sore due to accumulated rubbish which spreads outside the boundary of the site.

Other

ID sylw: 88968

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Nigel Rock

5.4 G&Travellers and Boat Dwelling
The comment regarding the number of boat dwellers in Napton is noted, derived from supporting reports. In the tight time scale of the plan detail discussion of this aspect it has not been possible to further understand the issues. However, not only are the numbers influenced by this single site but there are other sites where ostensible ‘mobile’ dwellers appear on the electoral roll. In a number of cases this suggests that immunity from enforcements may be the case and that informal accommodation of numbers of such ‘travellers’ of various types may need further explanation.

Generally speaking, I believe the experience elsewhere that is it is better to avoid large traveller sites.

No

ID sylw: 89020

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Adequate land must be set aside in new settlements or growth areas to accommodate these developments. They must not be left to chance or afterthought

Yes

ID sylw: 89063

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Julie Hudson

I think this is an excellent part of the plan.

Other

ID sylw: 89129

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara Bird

It would make sense that these sites provided/allowed would be within areas where integration is possible, the old football club for example is near facilities and schools with minimal travel.
Boat dwellers site availability in conjunction with relevant organisations makes sense.

Yes

ID sylw: 89238

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jon Knight

It is better to have a planned, and understood, provision for travellers than have them suddenly appear and occupy land assigned for other purposes with no infrastructure to support them. We've all seen the results of that happening in the past - trespass, terrible mess being left behind and communities being put into conflict with one another.

Yes

ID sylw: 89394

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

Yes

ID sylw: 89553

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

I strongly support retaining spaces for the traveller community and not encroaching on their sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 89919

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Pillerton Priors Parish Council

The policy relating to large scale development sites to include a requirement for developers to provide pitches and plots on those sites. This is a sensible way of overcoming local resistance in that, if the pitches/plots are developed at the same time as the large scale development then there would be no established residents to object. There is also likely to be much better infrastructure than is the case in small rural plots.