Yes

ID sylw: 90064

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson

Everyone has the right to a secure home, however where this accommodation is located needs careful consideration and should not negatively impact local communities. Development should involve the local community early in the process and consideration should be given to local infrastructure and amenities, and if they can cope with additional pressure.

No

ID sylw: 90264

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Edwards

Surely such services should be available only to those who contribute to their cost via council tax, income tax, national insurance etc. As an alternative, services should be available on a fully costed, commercial basis between provider and user, including direct cost of build, running etc and indirect costs, such as adequate and effective policing, personal security, loss and damage to property, sanitation etc.
[Text redacted]

No

ID sylw: 90939

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs sarah wood

why are these needs separated from the general public?

Other

ID sylw: 91015

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Canal & River Trust

The Accommodation Assessment Study has identified a need for an additional 35 residential boat moorings over the plan period. Policy Direction 11 indicates that the local planning authorities will work with other organisations, including the Canal & River Trust, to deliver the additional capacity identified as being required. The Trust recommends further direct engagement on this matter as any such moorings on the Trust’s waterways will need to be acceptable to us and will need to be licensed by the Trust. We therefore do not recommend that locations on the Trust’s waterways are selected without prior consultation with the Trust.

Other

ID sylw: 91143

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

The proposal to include sites within large residential developments is not supported.

No

ID sylw: 91250

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

I dare not write my real thoughts on the idea of Gypsy and Traveller Community encampments integrated into housing developments of 500+ dwellings. Suffice to say Planners have had some harebrained ideas over the years but this one takes the proverbial biscuit.

Other

ID sylw: 91442

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Location of Gypsies, travellers and Travelling Show people should be achieved at a County level and not District level. Key larger sites in a county should be allocated unlike what is today many smaller sites all over the place that may or may not be legal. I live within 4 miles of two traveller sites that i question are legal and another less than 6 miles away. Why couldn't one have been suffice?

Yes

ID sylw: 91622

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

Agree with policy direction of negotiated stopping places with appropriate facilities and expect that this will give more clarity and speedier resolution where non-negotiated stopping places are used. Accommodation for travellers there should be an element of self build in the large settlements.

Yes

ID sylw: 91708

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

N/A

No

ID sylw: 91751

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 91903

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Paula Holmes

It will make very little difference to your approach, (text redacted)

Other

ID sylw: 92455

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stuart Alford

My personal experience of travellers arriving in my local area is wholly negative [redacted]. I am open to recognising their right to their lifestyle but I am unsure why the plan looks to accommodate them.

Yes

ID sylw: 92534

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Fairburn

N/A

No

ID sylw: 92585

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

Do not agree with any development on green belt land for any person or group of people

No

ID sylw: 92616

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

Yes to providing specific sites for the traveller community, but I know that trying to integrate these within or next to existing housing developments will cause serious issues between the two. The travelling community have their own code of conduct and way of living which can be at odds with other residents - speaking from experience when travellers have pitched up nearby Hatton, Warwick and Kenilworth.
We need site specific areas for travellers so that they can keep to their lifestyle and integrate with locals as and when - rather than forcing the two communities together.

Other

ID sylw: 92911

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

To suggest large scale settlements for these groups seems to be asking for trouble. But they should be encouraged to settle in appropriate sites so that they can access health care and education and contribute to the wider community

Yes

ID sylw: 93380

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93462

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

N/A

No

ID sylw: 93616

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Steph Johnson

"Provide for Future Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation need. The Local Plan will requirethe provision of pitches and plots on large scale development sites (of over 500 homes) to meet the identified need as set out in the latest GTAA accommodation assessment (or any subsequent update)." Not only are you going to saddle certain communities with huge numbers of houses, but you will also force those communities to provide sites for Gypsies and Travellers too? This is unconstitutional and will lead to social unrest.

Yes

ID sylw: 93930

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley

Please prioritise the temporary traveller sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 93931

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carina Taylor

Provide Leamington with a bigger Football stadium which has better access and can serve the community better, provide better sporting opportunities and community activities, don't have to be football.
The current Leamington FC would be an ideal size for Travellers etc

Yes

ID sylw: 94586

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

n/a

Other

ID sylw: 94813

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

The proposal for transit provision needs clarification on matters such as criteria for locations suitable to deliver the services identified

No

ID sylw: 95369

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Guy Vellacott

I do not believe that land should be handed over to anyone with out paying for it and its upkeep.

No

ID sylw: 95698

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Wilson Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

There is no credible evidence to support the Councils proposed approach to GTAA provision.

No

ID sylw: 95730

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

A blanket requirement for provision of Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation within all sites over 500 homes is not considered acceptable. The suitability of sites of this scale to accommodate the identified need should be assessed on a site-by-site basis; having regard to the scale and distribution of need, and the constraints and opportunities presented by the proposed allocations. Sites may also come forward elsewhere in the District through windfalls, and therefore the need and timing of provision will need to be kept under review.

Other

ID sylw: 95917

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Why is there no upper limit of plot/pitches proscribed when the two options H6a and H6c were equally favoured?

No

ID sylw: 96042

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

These minority groups are capable of finding their own accommodation. The focus should be upon supporting the old and vulnerable who are not capable of finding suitable accommodation.

Other

ID sylw: 96315

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County representatives support this provided that the provision of pitches and plots on large scale development sites of over 500 homes includes the possibility of S106 contributions being made instead for offsite provision.

Other

ID sylw: 96568

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Why is no upper limit of plot/pitches proscribed when the two options H6a and H6c were equally favoured?