Yes

ID sylw: 101194

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mac Mic Group

Asiant : Marrons

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Yes

ID sylw: 101213

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land Management Limited

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Yes

ID sylw: 101399

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Asiant : Marrons

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Yes

ID sylw: 101496

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Yes

ID sylw: 101515

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land

Asiant : Marrons

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

No

ID sylw: 101710

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Yes

ID sylw: 101914

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Agree

No

ID sylw: 101956

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Isabel Collins

not enough emphasis on new transport train links

Yes

ID sylw: 102160

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson

I agree, but we should also consider micromobility last mile solutions like e-cargo bikes which are effective in many parts of the country

Yes

ID sylw: 102232

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Crump

This policy direction recognises the reality that people will be reliant on motor vehicles for many of their journeys in the future. Whilst the gradual shift to electric vehicles may mitigate the resulting increased pollution to a certain extent, this will take many years to be fully effective and thus lead to negative environmental and health impacts in the meantime. Not only will pollution undermine the sustainability of Meon Vale and Long Marston Airfield, but the traffic congestion on the adjacent B4632 will also have major negative impacts affecting both residential amenity and the welfare of tourists.

Yes

ID sylw: 102375

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough

Asiant : Marrons

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Yes

ID sylw: 102400

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

The policy direction is generally welcomed. When wording the detailed related policies, a level of flexibility should be afforded with a positively worded approach to support active and low-carbon transport journeys.

For sites such as land at Cophams Hill, its proximity to existing transport infrastructure, including major road networks and potential freight corridors, offers a strategic advantage. Policies should be supportive of sites that can accommodate sustainable transport options. This approach not only adheres to the NPPF but also fosters a cohesive integration of transport and land use planning, promoting sustainable growth and community well-being.

Other

ID sylw: 102404

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Asiant : Turley

The Draft Policy direction is supported in principle. The associated Justification wording cross-references the NPPF that opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary between urban and rural areas is supported. Specific reference to this should be included within the Policy wording.

Yes

ID sylw: 102866

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Turley

Further emphasis should be made within the policy to maximise the benefit of strategic infrastructure investment to help support any opportunities for ‘last mile’ freight journeys. The University recommends that greater emphasis be placed within the policy to encourage integration of new development with placemaking and delivery of new and improved local transport networks to prioritise sustainable modes of travel. Reference to 20-minute neighbourhood principles should also be considered here. All new developments should be required to produce a Delivery and Servicing Plan to support applications. The use of delivery and servicing consolidation hubs should form part of this policy

Yes

ID sylw: 103109

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes

Asiant : Marrons

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

No

ID sylw: 103351

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jenny Stevens

Need more railway stations planned in

Other

ID sylw: 103621

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Asiant : Turley

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

ID sylw: 103623

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

ID sylw: 103624

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton

Asiant : Turley

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

ID sylw: 103626

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton

Asiant : Turley

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

ID sylw: 103627

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

ID sylw: 103631

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

ID sylw: 103632

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Yes

ID sylw: 103769

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Carter

Promote zero carbon methods of transport
Prioritise cycling and protect and invest in national cycle routs to connect communities.

No

ID sylw: 103941

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Amarjit Gill

We should build more rail stations to improve local links and to rely less on road

Yes

ID sylw: 104214

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Norrie

This policy, taken alone, seems reasonable, though as noted in my response to DPD31 above, it needs to be enframed and informed by a better understanding of sustainable transport principles, as does the whole chapter.

Yes

ID sylw: 104500

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 104819

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Ann Colley

'Last Mile' should be increased to 5miles to increase the coverage area.

Other

ID sylw: 105584

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sian Kellaway

current road networks between villagers like kineton, Wellesbourne and lighthorne are already poorly maintained and at capacity

Yes

ID sylw: 107083

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswolds National Landscape Board

Overall, the Cotswolds National Landscape (CNL) Board agrees with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33. This approach aligns with the approach that is advocated in Policy CC1 (Climate Change - Mitigation) of the CNL Management Plan65 and in the Board’s Climate Change Strategy66.
However, we recommend that Draft Policy Direction 33 and / or the supporting text should also explicitly address the thresholds for increases in traffic movements that are considered to be significant. These thresholds are set out in the guidance on ‘Environmental Assessment of Traffic and Movement’, published by the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA).67
For most roads, the threshold is a 30% increase in traffic movements and for ‘sensitive areas’ it is 10%. The Board’s Tranquillity Position Statement refers to these thresholds and states that the 10% threshold should be applied in relation to increases in traffic movements on roads through - and along the boundary of - the CNL.68 As outlined in the Tranquillity Position Statement, the Board considers that increases above this 10% threshold are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the tranquillity of the CNL, which is one of the area’s ‘special qualities’.69
We recommend that Draft Policy Direction 33 should explicitly state that proposals that would increase traffic movements on roads through - and along the boundary of - the CNL by 10% or more will not be supported.