BASE HEADER

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 61 i 90 o 121

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95230

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Travel plans should be meaningful, deliverable and enforceable. The current trend is for travel plans to describe what might happen in an ideal world e.g. car sharing

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95319

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposals to date just appear to pay lip service for need for environmental considerations. Focus should be on the new solutions/links rather than piling more pressure on existing over-burdened links. Havent seen much of a transport assessment referred to in the draft policy.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95629

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is not enough emphasis on new railway stations to improve links for employment, reducing traffic congestion and pollution.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95770

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95861

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve transportation links for employment

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95883

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Carter

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The work of the Local Planning Authority and the Highways Authority requires much better co-ordination in relation to the highway capacity needed to service developments both individually and collectively. Some highway capacity issues are unavoidable because of old historical layouts but others stem from poor integration between land use planning and transport planning.
The highway infrastructure required for new developments should be installed upfront not after the development has taken place.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95959

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes. Employment designated sites in Local Centres need to be protected to encourage local businesses and hence reduce road traffic use by encouraging the workforce to walk/cycle to work as the employment will be within the settlement.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96353

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96514

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Employment designated sites in Local Centres need to be protected to encourage local businesses and hence reduce road traffic use by encouraging the workforce to walk/cycle to work as the employment will be within the settlement.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96878

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The provision of appropriate infrastructure in settlements E1, B1 and X2 would present fewer challenges and less cost than in BW where traffic movement to and from the settlement would cause pollution, disruption to local communities and congestion on local roads. Electric vehicles will not provide a solution for the foreseeable future.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97058

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97084

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes, employment sites are needed in local centres to reduce travel and make it sustainable.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97149

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No, there is not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve travel links for employment, reducing congestion and air pollution

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97201

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97277

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97777

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Development at BW would result in considerable vehicle movement causing pollution, congestion on surrounding roads and disruption to local communities. Electric vehicles will not solve this for the foreseeable future. Settlement sites such as E1, B1 and X2 would be more suitable in presenting less challenge and cost.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97879

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve
transportation links for employment, reducing carbon emissions and traffic congestion. Travelling by road is very inefficient and doesn’t promote growth for the economy compared to rail or bus where more people can travel at once with minimal environmental impact.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97889

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I hope the idea of re-opening a rail /tram link between Honeybourne and Stratford via long Marstonwill be seriously considered.
I also think that more consideration should be given to the known consequences of improving traffic flows by road building. This encourages more people and freight to travel further, when we now need to be investigating ways of reducing road travel by making it possible to satisfy more of our needs from and within the local area or by using public transport.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97976

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Charlotte Careless

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Not enough on building new train stations, which would support with easing traffic contention.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98003

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Fox

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is good but clearly not been applied in thinking to the ratings of the various options.
And selecting sites due to proximity to low capacity Diesel train routes in not appropriate - locations need to be selected that they minimise distance travelled as well - with connectivity to major transport corridors being important - eg M40 and North / South major train routes - not just North to Birmingham

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98125

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98579

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Holly Farm Business Park

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Further employment development at Holly Farm Business Park would be consistent with the requirements of this policy.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98610

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There needs to be priority on creating new railway links to improve transportation for employment, reducing carbon emissions and traffic congestion.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98634

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98937

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree with the approach

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99678

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Bedford

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Please stop heavy traffic using Clopton Bridge

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100167

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Good in principle.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100432

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There needs to be more emphasis on developing new public transport infrastructure such as railway stations and light railway.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100535

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Draper

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The location of CI settlement is incompatible with the 33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101088

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy direction is generally welcomed. When wording the detailed related policies, a level of flexibility should be afforded with a positively worded approach to support active and low-carbon transport journeys.

Policies should be supportive of sites that can accommodate sustainable transport options. This approach not only adheres to the NPPF but also fosters a cohesive integration of transport and land use planning, promoting sustainable growth and community well-being.