Yes

ID sylw: 104218

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

I do not think that this green belt land is suitable for building on. It provides a much needed green space between Hampton Magna and Warwick. It is not sustainable to keep taking land out of greenbelt. If you continue building on the greenbelt, there will be no open spaces around the village.

Yes

ID sylw: 104230

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jo Valentine Barker

Sites i object to all in SG17:
148 & 747- flooding & CNL
62, 273, 393, 396, 433, 860 - infrastructure is lacking no transport links, no trains, against the NDP
465 - contains designated employment site in NDP.

No

ID sylw: 104240

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jenny Curtis

Ref Id 119. This is precious greenbelt. It’s what gives Warwickshire its unique special quality. The junction at Birmingham road gets very congested now and will become impossible to turn right towards Warwickshire without major improvements. Who pays? Associated increase in noise pollution and massive reduction in air quality is not something to aspire to!

Yes

ID sylw: 104242

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Charlotte Moss

REFID 184
SITENAME Land at Wasperton Road, Wasperton

I object to this site being used for development due to the impact on the local surroundings in Wasperton and impact on beauty of the village. I object because I look out onto this site and my view will be greatly impacted by a development. Loss of this green space would negatively affect the overall aesthetic of the village and harm the environment including damage to natural hedgerows and wildlife habitats that are currently in the site.

Other

ID sylw: 104281

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

We have included specific comments in the developments below related to individual locations, however the following general points apply to all of the locations so that SWFT are able to continue to deliver safe services for South Warwickshire residents.

- requirement for investment in healthcare infrastructure and services, including NHS Trusts and primary care
- requirement for investment in transport infrastructure
- ensure no detrimental impact on inequalities
- SWFT would not support prioritisation of development on green belt land or woodlands unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration.

No

ID sylw: 104295

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jenny Curtis

Ref id 621. Greenbelt should not be being used whenever possible. The existing health care in the area is insufficient for an increase in population. Warwickshire hospital has no capacity to grow in infrastructure. Existing roads are not sufficiently robust to take increase in traffic associated with building transport. Who pays for upgrade? Local councils can’t afford it surely. In recent times the disruption caused by other projects have caused intolerable mayhem. It would surely be much worse with the proposals of various building sites in the area.

Yes

ID sylw: 104299

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew Jones

Site 664 - land east of Church lane Radford Semele is local green space and is protected from development by para 11 NPPF and footnote 7 of the same. Please reject the application to make it a preferred site. The site is designated local green space in the Radford neighbourhood plan which was fully supported by the planning inspector when the Radford plan was approved

Yes

ID sylw: 104344

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joe Cole

Ref ID 664 (Land at Offchurch Lane).
For the following reasons I do not think it is appropriate to consider this site for development:
1) Primary School Capacity would not accommodate additional housing - catchment area already very small
2) During heavy rain the sewage works requires pumping out all through the night, suggesting it cannot cope with existing capacity
3) NPPF paragraph 11 D(I) footnote 7 states "Local Green Spaces" should be excluded
4) Impact on traffic into and through the village
5) Over development of Radford Semele as this would be the 4th large housing development

Yes

ID sylw: 104352

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr andrew gibbons

re. sg17 Doesn’t adhere strategic objectives: ‘sustainable level growth in area’ or ‘growth is proportionate’ to Shipton’s scale or ‘located in sustainable area’ i.e a floodplain! Doesn’t adhere to ‘location with good transport communications / people able access jobs, adequate services’. Development would double Shipston’s size, ruining it as small, historic town. Development isn’t resilient to climate change - Shipston bridge closes regularly from Stour flooding. Doesn’t adhere to ‘protecting the environmental asset:’ River Stour PLWS. Besides all that, historic post-medieval bridge only allows one vehicle at a time - development would hugely increase bridge traffic to an un-workable level.

Yes

ID sylw: 104354

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jenny Curtis

Ref id 95. This is precious greenbelt and should not be built on. It is gone forever. We lose an essential part of the character of our community and environment. I’ve lived in the village for nearly 30 years and it feels like a desecration. The wildlife and ecology will be disrupted and destroyed. We should be custodians of our land not rampant consumers. Our representatives in local government should be standing up for it and protecting what is precious.

Yes

ID sylw: 104394

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jenny Curtis

Please no more building on greenbelt land. Health service infrastructure is insufficient for more housing. There are not enough schools, doctors to cover increase in population. The noise pollution and air quality is noticeably worse since the increase in housing, road building and industrial sites. This will only get worse.

Yes

ID sylw: 104425

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Hill

I object to the development as it significantly affects many aspects of Wasperton conservation area, safety and facilities without providing significant accommodation or benefits to the local plan. There are many downsides and few benefits for the proposal. Circa five houses is not a significant benefit for south warwickshire plan or for the resultant detriments to the current population. With the Quarry development also proposed there is SIGNIFICENT damage to the area already.

Yes

ID sylw: 104435

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Claire Javeleau

Ref ID 664 Land at Offchurch Lane is not suitable for development:

1. the catchment area for the school is only 300m wide, any residential development here would displace most other village residents
2. existing capacity constraints for sewage and drainage; Severn Trent regularly attended the facility directly adjacent to the Land to pump sewage away. In November 2024 they attended 24hrs a day for 7 days straight
3. NPPF paragraph 11 D(I) footnote 7 states "Local Green Spaces" should be excluded
4. This would be over development of village
5. Impact on traffic through the village

Yes

ID sylw: 104439

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

Reference ID: 573, 715
I am strongly against building on green belt land. The green belt exists to protect the countryside and maintain areas of natural beauty. Developing these areas would result in the loss of valuable open spaces that are essential for wildlife, local ecosystems, and the well-being of communities.

Building on Green belt land would also result in increased pollution, destroy natural habitats and harm wildlife.

Yes

ID sylw: 104465

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

Reference number: 55
The Green belt land here is not suitable for building on for the following reasons such as that there would be a destruction of wildlife and biodiversity. Also, there is much needed open green space around the village to promote the development of wildlife habitats, building on this land would take away this needed green space which would have a very damaging effect on the wellbeing of the local community, Hampton Magna

Other

ID sylw: 104476

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jessica Crook

Site ref: 326 - Land at Sycamore Close, Stockton

* Stockton cannot support development of this scale
* Infrastructure is already strained (narrow roads, no off street parking, school at capacity without scope for extension) & extensive highway safety issues
* development here would result in significant harm to the landscape. It would not contribute to a beautiful Warwickshire and would ruin the rolling landscape and vistas (see 2011 landscape study in SDC evidence base) & village character
* many protected species on the site
* significant development not sustainable in Stockton
* smaller development elsewhere in village more appropriate

Yes

ID sylw: 104485

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

Reference number: 95
I think that building on this open, Green belt land is not acceptable. Doing so would result in damaged wildlife habitats, and result of no green, open land around Hampton Magna. This green land is essential for providing open, green space which allows the growth of wildlife. It is completely unsustainable to take land out of green belt to be used for development and continuing to do this will result in no green, rural areas around the village

Yes

ID sylw: 104492

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jessica Crook

Site ref: 480 - Land at Tuckwell Close, Stockton

Site ref: 326 - Land at Sycamore Close, Stockton

* Stockton cannot support development of this scale
* Infrastructure is already strained (narrow roads, no off street parking, school at capacity without scope for extension) & extensive highway safety issues
* village boundary would become visible from the main road - harm to character of the village
* significant development not sustainable in Stockton
* smaller development elsewhere in village more appropriate

Yes

ID sylw: 104520

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

This land marked here for development is green belt and therefor is not suitable for the development of houses. Green belt land is necessary for the growth of animal habitats. Green belt land is also used for preventing the building of houses and provides open, green land which protects wildlife and open space. If you continue to build on this green belt land, there will be none left around the village.

Yes

ID sylw: 104536

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

Reference numbers: 233, 621, 119
This land marked here for development is green belt and therefor is not suitable for the development of houses. Green belt land is necessary for the growth of animal habitats. Green belt land is also used for preventing the building of houses and provides open, green land which protects wildlife and open space. If you continue to build on this green belt land, there will be none left around the village.
The Green Belt land here is not suitable for development for the reasons listed above

Yes

ID sylw: 104561

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jessica Crook

Site ref 694 - Land at Napton Road, Stockton

* small scale development at this location may be reasonable, but the impact on safety at the main road junction would need to be assessed further before agreeing. There are already significant safety concerns here.
* there are limited facilities in Stockton and so development should be restricted to much smaller numbers. 40 is too large. There is no scope to improve infrastructure and facilities to support significant development.

No

ID sylw: 104600

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: (Alison) Claire Kime

Barford's infrastructure cannot cope with the existing houses in the village after the recent expansion to the village. The sewerage system cannot cope with the existing houses, with frequent road floods and Severn Trent work, and with the need for manual sewerage extraction for a significant period of time on Bremridge Close. The school is full. There is no medical centre. Parts of Site 749 also flood regularly. Please address these issues before you begin to contemplate allowing 1200 new homes on the flood plain in Barford.

Yes

ID sylw: 104749

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Godbert

The site should be rejected on the grounds of its Local Green space protection status in the Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan. Referring to the NPPF paragraph 11 d (I) specifically Footnote 7 says "Local Green Spaces" should be excluded.

This is also a proposed development that impacts on the setting of the church in Radford Semele which is protected.

No

ID sylw: 104829

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Carr

I do not support building at REFID 600. This land you refer to on the map is at the back of my properly. Not only would it completely destroy the view for us and for the houses on malthouse lane but it would be an eye sore to everyone around. The land is very wet as it is so close to the lakes, so surely this is not ideal to build on. The access is limited with a single track road. Emergency services would struggle to access these houses and provide care.

Yes

ID sylw: 104948

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Ellis

Agree

Other

ID sylw: 104998

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth White

658 'Land off 'Greenfield Road' adjacent to Barn Farm'

‘Greenfield Road’ = BRIDLEWAY W119 = ‘REGIA VIA INTER RADEFORD ET WYTENAS 1285’ (W/23/1746 Attachment 19)

CV31 1UT is the Valley Road, Radford Semele postcode for the two farms on the Bridleway.

'Whitnash Brook Local Nature Reserve & Local Wildlife Site' (W/23/1746 Attachment 37) is directly opposite - on the other side of the Brook.

Footpath W119b currently waterlogged.

Adjacent site 599 'Land at Greenfield Road' > Sifted Out

High Level Transport Assessment Document no: B23WCS01/REP/001 Revision no: 9 is FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED [Introduction/ Chapter 10 A Well-Connected South Warwickshire]

Other

ID sylw: 105031

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth White

700 'Land west of Radford Semele'

'Area of Separation' supported by Radford Semele Neighbourhood Development Plan Policy RS12

No

ID sylw: 105059

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brian Jukes

I am a resident of Shrewley and I formally object to the inclusion of Site 610 (Tunnel Barn Farm) in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. I believe this development would significantly harm the community and environment, primarily through the loss of green space, which is valued for recreation and as a buffer against urban sprawl. Additionally, the site supports local wildlife, and its destruction would disrupt ecosystems and reduce biodiversity. I wish to register my objection to this development.

Other

ID sylw: 105065

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Jackson

The Paddock, Wasperton Site Ref: 184
I would like to object to the plan for this site being considered for residential allocation. Wasperton is a rural village on a very narrow road, so the additional traffic would cause serious problems and a risk to pedestrians, of which there are many. The road is currently only wide enough for one car in many places and there are no footpaths. The paddock is also a key feature of the village, and a sanctuary for wildlife.

This just seems to be the wrong location.

Other

ID sylw: 105066

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrea Jackson

Site Ref: 184, The Paddock, Wasperton
I am writing to object to the application to use Wasperton Paddock for housing. Wasperton is a very small village with no amenities and it does not even have mains drainage.

The village has a single, very narrow lane only wide enough for 1 car in many places so the extra traffic could cause inappropriate congestion, and also be dangerous for pedestrians walking through the village.

The paddock is a key feature of the village and it backs into a conservation area, and the loss of the paddock and the surrounding hedgerows would have a big impact on local wildlife.