Other

ID sylw: 105261

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Helen Whiter

Comments on REFID 196
I believe that the lanes in Sherbourne cannot accommodate more traffic and parking due to their narrowness and lack of footpaths. There is already a planning application to convert a barn into three houses, potentially adding 6-9 cars to the roads. The peaceful view across the field is crucial to the village's character, particularly within the Conservation Area. Ongoing water and sewage issues remain unresolved, and adding more houses would exacerbate these problems. Additionally, the lack of local services would mean new residents relying on cars, contradicting the Council’s sustainability policy.

No

ID sylw: 105264

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Chris Hutchins

I object to the proposed developments near Cox Crescent and Green Acres Nursing Home due to serious flooding risks and increased traffic. Our drainage system, including attenuation ponds, cannot handle additional development, exacerbating flooding issues that already affect Marton Road cottages. Furthermore, there's only one exit from the area, leading to traffic congestion on an already problematic main road. Additionally, the sloped fields contribute to runoff and flooding, which already occurs without further hard landscaping, leaving the fields frequently boggy and waterlogged.

No

ID sylw: 105278

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Natalie Scibisz

Summary: Objection to the Inclusion of sites in Leek Wootton in the Draft South Warwickshire Development Plan

We are writing to object to the inclusion of land at The Warwickshire (REFIDs 2 and 229), land to North and South of Hill Wootton Road (REFID 116), and land near Black Spinney, Warwick Road (REFID 603), all sites in Leek Wootton, within the South Warwickshire Development Plan. The proposed developments would have major negative impacts on the village, its residents, and the surrounding environment. Our objections are on the following grounds:

1. Impact on the Integrity and Character of the Village

Leek Wootton is a distinct and historic village, and the current Local Plan commits to maintaining its separation from other settlements. The proposed developments would severely erode the village’s unique character and identity, merging it with nearby urban areas. This would undermine the commitment to preserving the village’s integrity, as outlined in the existing Local Plan.

2. Green Belt Land

The proposed development would encroach on Green Belt land, which is designated to prevent urban sprawl and protect the countryside. Building on Green Belt land in Leek Wootton would set a dangerous precedent and undermine the purpose of Green Belt policies, which are vital for maintaining the separation between settlements and preserving the rural character of the area.

3. Overdevelopment

Leek Wootton is designated a “growth village”. However, it is already earmarked for substantial growth, particularly with the Cala development at the Police HQ site. Further development would constitute overdevelopment, placing untenable strain on the village’s infrastructure, services, and community cohesion. The village is not equipped to accommodate additional large-scale development without significant detriment to its residents and environment.

4. Infrastructure and Pressures on Services

The village’s infrastructure, including schools, healthcare facilities, and public transport, is already under significant pressure. Additional development would exacerbate these challenges, leading to overcrowding and reduced quality of services for existing residents. The capacity of local infrastructure would have to be significantly enhanced before any further development.

5. Traffic Congestion and Road Safety

The Warwick Road, which runs through Leek Wootton, is already heavily congested and cannot be widened, in part due to the proximity of listed buildings. Increased traffic from new developments would worsen congestion, raise safety concerns, and negatively impact the quality of life for residents. Furthermore, the additional traffic would increase noise and air pollution, detracting from the village’s peaceful character.

6. Damage to Listed Buildings

The vibration and pollution caused by increased traffic poses a serious risk to the structural integrity of listed buildings in the village. These historic structures are irreplaceable assets, and their preservation must be prioritised. The proposed development would place them at unnecessary risk, potentially causing irreversible damage.

7. Ecological Impact and Loss of Wildlife Habitats

The proposed development would result in the loss of valuable wildlife habitats, threatening local biodiversity. Leek Wootton is home to a variety of species that rely on green spaces for survival. The destruction of these habitats would have long-term ecological consequences, undermining efforts to protect and enhance local wildlife.

8. Noise and Air Quality

Increased development would lead to higher levels of noise and air pollution, negatively impacting the health and well-being of residents. The village’s tranquil environment would be compromised, and the quality of life for those living in Leek Wootton would be significantly diminished.

9. Loss of Recreational Amenity

The proposed development would result in the loss of green spaces that are currently used for recreation by residents. These areas provide important opportunities for outdoor activities and contribute to the physical and mental well-being of the community. Their loss would be deeply felt by those who rely on them for leisure and relaxation.

10. Increased Risk of Flooding

The development of the land at The Warwickshire in particular would severely increase surface water runoff, raising the risk of flooding, as experienced following other nearby developments. This is particularly concerning with climate change giving us wetter winters and the escalating challenges of managing flood risk. The potential for water runoff makes this area inappropriate for housing.

Conclusion

We strongly object to the inclusion of sites in Leek Wootton within the South Warwickshire Development Plan. The proposed developments would have severe and far-reaching consequences for the village, its residents, and the surrounding environment. We urge you to reconsider these proposals and prioritise the preservation of Leek Wootton’s character, infrastructure, and natural environment. To this end, we request that the sites listed at the beginning of this letter be removed from the draft plan.

No

ID sylw: 105283

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Gavin JH Pollock CA

I wish to object to the proposed developments on Sites 148 and 747 for several reasons. Firstly, the HELAA assessment shows they rank poorly compared to other locations. Secondly, the existing country lanes are too narrow and unsuitable for increased traffic, particularly at peak commuting times. Access from the Honington bridge has restricted visibility, and both bridges would require costly structural changes. Additionally, the sites have a history of significant flooding, which could lead to high defence costs. Finally, the area is protected under the Cotswold National Landscape and is valued by the community for recreational use.

No

ID sylw: 105313

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust

We have reviewed a list of key Local Wildlife Sites that would be affected. The Council should refer to the most current Local Wildlife Site layer.

SG01 and SG02 - Broadwells Wood and Black Waste Wood Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and Wainbody and Kenilworth Road Woods LWS, Kenilworth Common LWS and River Sowe & Finham Brook & lakes
SG03 - Stonebridge Meadows LWS and River Sowe Potential local Wildlife Site
SG05 - River Avon LWS and Hill Wootton Farm Meadows Potential local Wildlife Site, North and South Cubbington Woods LWS, Waverley and Weston Wood LWS
SG12 - Long Itchinghton Quarry LWS and River Itchen PLWS
SG13 - Lighthorne Quarry LWS and Chesterton Wood LWS
SG14 - Oakham Coppice LWS, River Avon LWS, Itchington Holt and the Centenary Way
SG15/16 - River Avon and tributaries LWS and Hampton Wood LWS, Grove Fields Lane LWS, Wasperton Manor Farm LWS, Hampton Lucy Escarpment LWS, Charlescote gravel pits and Thelsford brook LWS
SG10/11 - River Avon and tributaries LWS
SG10/X1 - Oakley Wood
SG17 Shipston upon Stour - River Stour PLWS
SG20 - River Avon and tributaries LWS
SG18 - Hatton Hill Fields PLWS, Brownley Green Lane LWS, Home Farn Woods PLWS, Hatton Park LWS and Grand Union Canal West LWS
SG19 - River Avon LWS and disused railway PLWS and Bridgetown Fields LWS
SG20 - River Avon LWS
SG21 - River arrow LWS and Coldcomfort Wood PLWS
SG24 - Stratford-Upon-Avon Canal
SG07 - River Avon LWS and Budbrooke Farm woodlands LWS and Warwick Cemetery LWS
SG22 - New Coppice LWS, Coughton Park LWS Studley
SG23 - Mockley wood LWS, River Alne, Mockley Manor Farm PLWS

Yes

ID sylw: 105343

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Howarth

552
This is a valuable Recycling centre just outside of the town which needs to be maintained or relocated if this needs to be developed.

No

ID sylw: 105349

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Catherine Lynch

I have lived in Lapworth for 20 years and have witnessed significant infill building. However, the existing infrastructure is inadequate to support the proposed new dwellings. The village has limited amenities, including one small shop and one primary school. Transport options are very poor, with no afternoon train service and only school buses available. The local doctor's surgery is at full capacity, and job opportunities are scarce. Without significant investment in infrastructure, the area cannot sustain the proposed housing developments, and the costs would outweigh any potential benefits.

Other

ID sylw: 105353

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs philippa jamie

I believe site 569 (Land to South of Weston Under Wetherley) should be entirely removed from the local plan. It can only fit into a dispersed development model, which has been discarded. The HELAS assessment significantly underestimates the site's unsuitability, as it floods beyond its boundaries. This area is vital greenbelt land that prevents the merging of Leamington with nearby villages and reduces greenspace between Leamington and Coventry, risking urban sprawl. Additionally, the site has severe infrastructure limitations, including narrow access roads and inadequate transport options, making it unsuitable for development.

No

ID sylw: 105355

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Will Peachey

I write to object to helaa 160 and 159 on the grounds that this is agricultural land, in green belt with no local amenities to support this kind of development.

In particular I am concerned about traffic on the Birmingham Road and how difficult it will be to join it from Hatton Green and Hockley Road.

No

ID sylw: 105375

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Katherine Clarke

I am raising concerns about the proposed developments on the field off Cox Crescent (Plan Ref: 633 and 469). As a resident, I believe the estate cannot accommodate additional housing without increasing flooding risks to nearby properties. The estate lacks space for more traffic, having only one entrance/exit and no kerbs. I am worried about the impact on local wildlife and the strain on access to dental and GP services due to overdevelopment. Proper assessment for flooding is crucial, especially given recent flooding issues in the area.

Other

ID sylw: 105381

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mark Hooker

I formally object to the proposed development on site ID692 in the South Warwickshire Plan. As a Hatton Park resident for 12 years, I have several concerns. The development threatens the local environment, potentially harming watercourses and ecosystems. It is out of character with the surrounding area, altering the rural landscape and cultural heritage. The existing infrastructure is inadequate for the increased population, risking congestion and reduced access to services. Additionally, it would result in the loss of valuable agricultural land and increase flood risks. I urge the Planning Committee to reconsider this site.

No

ID sylw: 105382

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alison Emery

I am expressing my concerns about the proposed green-belt development connecting the rural historical villages of Hunningham and Weston-under-Wetherley. This area is unsuitable for low-cost housing due to its distance from Leamington Spa, lack of shops, poor bus service, and the necessity for multiple cars per family. Additionally, the site's size and potential dwelling number make it unsustainable, the cost of amenities would be too high, and there is inadequate primary school provision. The proximity to the HS2 line and regular flooding of the River Leam further exacerbate the issues. I hope these points are considered.

Other

ID sylw: 105383

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mark Hooker

I formally object to the proposed development on site ID166 of the South Warwickshire Plan, as I have lived on Hatton Park for 12 years. My concerns include the environmental impact, with 37% of the site having significant habitat value, risking local biodiversity. The site's proximity to wildlife sites raises further concerns about habitat fragmentation. Additionally, while not on prime agricultural land, losing agricultural spaces threatens food security. The development will also increase traffic noise and pollution, negatively affecting local residents. I urge the Planning Committee to reconsider this proposal. Thank you for your consideration.

No

ID sylw: 105397

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alistair & Susan Pringle

I wish to object to Site 148 Fell Mill Lane and Site 747 Leasowe Farm for several reasons. Flooding is a significant concern, as Honington residents often find themselves cut off, making travel difficult for new residents. Local schools and the medical centre are already under pressure, and I worry they won't be able to manage additional demand. Furthermore, Fell Mill Lane is a single track road without passing places, frequently used by walkers and cyclists, and increased traffic would hinder their access. Shipston lacks the necessary parking, shops, and employment opportunities for such an influx.

Other

ID sylw: 105414

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Chris Brazier

I am writing regarding the proposed development of green belt land between Weston Under Wetherley and Hunningham. I strongly oppose any further development in the greenbelt, emphasising its importance for farming and self-sufficiency. I also highlight the omission of the HS2 route in key documents, which should be included as it impacts the landscape. Additionally, I raise concerns about site 569's suitability for development due to flood risks, its role in maintaining green space, and significant infrastructure limitations that hinder access. I request that this site be removed from the local plan consideration.

Other

ID sylw: 105419

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Wheeldon

I formally object to the proposed developments at Chessetts Wood Road, Lapworth, (Ref ID-615) and other nearby sites. These projects will harm Lapworth's character and rural appeal, altering its landscape and negatively affecting biodiversity. Increased traffic will lead to safety concerns and pollution, overwhelming local infrastructure. The use of agricultural land is crucial for biodiversity, and the developments would exacerbate flooding risks. There is no evidence to justify these extensive plans, and I urge the council to reconsider them, as they do not address local needs as required by the SWLP.

Other

ID sylw: 105421

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Wheeldon

I am formally objecting to the proposed developments at , and surrounding areas. These developments will significantly harm the character and rural appeal of Lapworth-Arden Lodge, Station Lane (Ref ID 161), alter its landscape, and negatively impact local biodiversity. Increased traffic on local roads poses safety concerns and pollution issues, while the loss of agricultural land threatens natural resources. Additionally, the developments could exacerbate flooding risks. I believe there is no evidence of a justified local need for such extensive developments, and I urge the council to reconsider these proposals.

No

ID sylw: 105422

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Miller

I strongly oppose the housing development at site 62 in Shipston for several reasons. The area faces significant infrastructure challenges, including an overloaded sewer system and high flood risks. Local schools are full, and health services are overstretched. Key amenities like a train station and police station are lacking, forcing reliance on cars. The proposed site has been used for youth football and is designated as a "Wellbeing Zone," holding ecological value. Developing this site would harm the town's environmental and social wellbeing, making it an unsuitable location for housing.

Other

ID sylw: 105423

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Wheeldon

Objection to Ref ID- 649
The proposed developments will greatly harm the character and rural charm of Lapworth village, altering its landscape and negatively impacting natural beauty and biodiversity. Increased traffic on local roads will pose safety concerns and elevate pollution levels. The use of agricultural land threatens local biodiversity and could exacerbate flooding risks due to increased runoff. I strongly oppose these developments, urging the council to reconsider, as there is no evidence supporting the need for such extensive changes in Lapworth, contrary to the SWLP's requirements.

Other

ID sylw: 105424

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Wheeldon

Objection to Ref ID- 672
I believe the proposed developments will severely harm the character and rural appeal of Lapworth village. They would alter the landscape and negatively impact the area's natural beauty and biodiversity, as noted in the SWLP's environmental considerations. Additionally, I foresee significant traffic issues on local roads due to inadequate infrastructure, leading to safety concerns and increased pollution. The use of agricultural land is particularly troubling, as it threatens local biodiversity and increases flooding risks. I strongly oppose these developments and urge the council to reconsider, as there is no evidence of a local need for them.

Other

ID sylw: 105425

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Wheeldon

Objection to Ref ID- 153
The proposed developments in Lapworth village will significantly harm its character and rural appeal, altering the landscape and negatively affecting natural beauty and biodiversity. They will create severe traffic issues on local roads due to inadequate infrastructure, leading to safety concerns and increased pollution. The use of vital agricultural land for development threatens local biodiversity and increases flooding risks. There is no evidence of a need for such extensive developments, which contradicts the SWLP's requirements. I strongly oppose these proposals and urge the council to reconsider them.

Other

ID sylw: 105426

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Wheeldon

Objection to Ref ID-136
The proposed developments in Lapworth village will severely impact its character and rural appeal, altering the landscape and threatening natural beauty and biodiversity. They will cause local traffic issues on key roads, overwhelming existing infrastructure and raising safety, pollution, and litter concerns. The use of agricultural land at Chessetts Wood Road is particularly troubling, as it is vital for local biodiversity. Increased impermeable surfaces will heighten flooding risks, which are already a significant concern. I strongly oppose these developments and urge the council to reconsider, as there is no evidence of local need for such extensive changes.

No

ID sylw: 105428

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Tompkins

I formally object to the proposed housing development on Site Ref 623 in Wellesbourne. My objections are based on several issues. The site is prone to flooding, located in Flood Zone 3, and developing it would worsen water runoff and flooding risks for nearby areas, including Chapel Street. Access is inadequate, posing safety hazards due to increased vehicle movements on narrow paths, and there is insufficient pedestrian infrastructure. Additionally, developing this historically valuable land would disrupt the rural character of Wellesbourne and strain local services. I urge reconsideration of this proposal and oppose further house building in Wellesbourne.

Other

ID sylw: 105438

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Vivan Alemi

I formally object to the inclusion of the proposed new settlement location B1 Hatton (site ref 153) in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. My objections include significant impacts on the Green Belt, insufficient infrastructure to support the development, detrimental effects on local wildlife, and overwhelming demands on community services. The development would exacerbate traffic issues, increase pollution, and may lead to a decline in walking and cycling. Additionally, sustainability concerns are not adequately addressed. I urge the Planning Committee to reconsider this proposal, as the negative impacts far outweigh any potential benefits.

Yes

ID sylw: 105463

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Charlie Ball

I formally object to the planning application for houses on the field behind "Long Ground" and "The Old Orchard" in Wellesbourne (Site 623) due to several issues. The site is in Flood Zone 3, posing significant flooding risks. Access is inadequate, with narrow paths creating safety hazards for pedestrians. Increased traffic congestion would exacerbate existing issues. The land has historic and environmental significance, being medieval "ridge and furrow" assessed as "high" in the Wellesbourne Neighbourhood Plan's landscape character sensitivity assessment. The development would strain local infrastructure, and I urge reconsideration to protect Wellesbourne's character, environment, and residents' quality of life.

Other

ID sylw: 105481

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Manor Oak Homes Limited

Asiant : Jeremy Flawn

Land at Long Marston Grounds is not Green Belt and is about 1km from the Cotswold National Landscape. It is well-contained by vegetation, limiting visibility from the surrounding area. Nearby heritage assets include a Grade II listed farmhouse and a Scheduled Monument. The area's character has changed due to housing development. The site has no Sites of Special Scientific Interest nearby and will manage surface water flooding with a SuDS scheme. A master plan proposes around 30 housing units, with connectivity to local services and adherence to local design policies.

No

ID sylw: 105484

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sharon Bradley

I am deeply concerned about the excessive housing plans for Tamworth in Arden, Ullenhall, Henley in Arden, and Claverdon. I believe these developments will severely impact our local infrastructure, wildlife, and countryside, as well as exacerbate traffic issues on poorly maintained village roads. Education and health services are already stretched, and the additional demand will be detrimental. Having lived in this area for many years, I strongly object to these plans, fearing they will lead to irreversible damage to our environment and community. Please reconsider these proposals carefully.

No

ID sylw: 105488

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Michaela Byrne

Cox Crescent and Greenways proposed planning

I’d like my objections to any proposed planning on this plot. The land historically floods and whilst there is a pond to take surplus water from this is always at a high level. The movement of the slope could cause neighbouring existing houses to suffer from the deluge from the fields. Not only this but there is only one way in and out to the main busy road, with the 30mph limit being flaunted and local authority and police unable to manage this.

Other

ID sylw: 105501

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Lydia Haley

I oppose the proposed development plans for Weston under Wetherley. I strongly advocate against further development in the greenbelt, as various options already exist without adding new strategic growth. I am concerned that the HS2 route is omitted from key planning images, despite being a significant landscape feature. Development should not extend over the HS2 barrier, which could erode the greenbelt. I request the removal of site 569 from consideration, citing severe flood risks, its importance in maintaining greenbelt separation, and significant infrastructure limitations that hinder access.

No

ID sylw: 105505

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Richard Jarvis

I formally object to the proposed development of settlement C1, Chessetts Wood Road Lapworth (Ref 615) and the cumulative impact of developments around Lapworth and Hockley Heath due to significant impact on the area's beauty, historic properties, and local tourism. Increased traffic and pollution would degrade infrastructure and harm local businesses. The development would lead to light and noise pollution, require new bridges over canals, and exacerbate issues with limited gas supply and sewage systems. Lapworth train station is already inadequate, lacking bus services, and the local school cannot accommodate more children. Additionally, the disruption to wildlife is a serious concern.