No

ID sylw: 105508

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Robin Johnson

I have several concerns about Kingswood as a new settlement site and infill site 235. The narrow roads, particularly during peak times, create congestion, while existing services like gas, mobile signal, water supply, sewage, and power are inadequate. The train service is unreliable with few connections, and local amenities, including the doctor’s surgery and schools, are already at capacity. The area’s countryside and wildlife are valuable and should not be compromised. Additionally, the Swallowfield site faces flooding and traffic risks. Overall, I believe Kingswood cannot support new housing developments due to these limitations.

No

ID sylw: 105510

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jacyntha Kelly

I formally oppose the proposal for SITE 600 to build up to 52 houses on Malthouse Lane. Having lived in Malthouse Lane for four years, I believe this development represents excessive over-development that would harm local wildlife and habitats. It would increase traffic on already struggling roads and negatively impact the green belt and local views. The existing sewage system is under stress, and there are better alternatives for development that should be considered. I wholeheartedly object to these proposals.

No

ID sylw: 105513

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Gillian O'Sullivan

I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposals for building on the fields off Cox Crescent and Green Acres Nursing Home in Long Itchington. The village has already experienced significant changes with recent housing developments, overwhelming local infrastructure. We face regular flooding, inadequate facilities, and increased road accidents due to the growing number of homes. The local school and healthcare services are already at capacity and cannot accommodate more families. I firmly believe that further development does not align with the village plan and should not proceed.

Other

ID sylw: 105520

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Abbie Rae

I am emailing to ask that the plans for the development of Kings Hill be reconsidered ideally totally scrapped. !

As a local Finham resident, I don't believe that the plans have given real consideration to the practical implications for local residents who have to live and work in the area.

Therefore I'd like you to reconsider the following.

1) Removal of the proposed bus gate on Green Lane immediately next to the Finham Primary School, due to the increased traffic congestion, increased risk of accidents, and further danger to children, parents, and local residents.

2) Removal of the proposed roundabout at the junction of Green Lane/Howes Lane as it
will encroach too much on what little greenery will be left and doesn't have any consideration for the size of traffic (such as large lorries) that will be expected to go around it.

3) A commitment to preserving our ancient hedgerows along the south end of Green Lane.
4) A commitment to preserving our trees along Green Lane especially those with Tree
Preservation Orders.
5) An implementation of a ‘green’ corridor along Green Lane, particularly around the back of the primary school which will ultimately contribute to the biodiversity requirements of the area.

6) A guarantee to preserving the Anglo-Saxon remains close to the junction of Kings Hill
Lane with Green Lane.
7) Would like assurances for a new children’s play area as close to Finham as
possible, ideally on the site of the proposed bus gate
8) Would like assurances the promised Primary and Senior schools will be built
early in the building phase so as not to further stretch the resources of our
current local schools.
9) Would like assurances the promised clinic will be built during the first phase of
building.
(10) Consideration is given to a commitment for a new Community Centre building.

No

ID sylw: 105524

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sarah Stallard and Adam Brown

Nifer y bobl: 2

We strongly object to Strategic Growth Location SG20 and Site REFID 16 the planning application as local residents living next to the proposed site. Our concerns include insufficient infrastructure, noise and pollution from construction traffic, severe drainage issues, and the high visual impact of the fields. Additionally, we are worried about the loss of agricultural land, the proximity to grade 2 listed properties, and the lack of public transport. The area's narrow roads pose hazards, particularly for children, and local health services and schools are already overloaded. We also emphasise the importance of wildlife and environmental conservation.

No

ID sylw: 105525

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Stanley

Objection to Suggested developments in Great Alne

Dismayed to hear about the proposals for further developments within the village. With the Gt Alne Park development effectively doubling the size of the village already and the previous two developments being approved, the village is becoming unrecognisable. Obviously times move on but I believe this latest proposal is excessive and will change the feel of the area we live in.

The roads are already much busier than they once were and Gt Alne is now a rate in for other developed areas this will only increase. The flooding issue has become ridiculous, and the taking up of more ground with base concrete will add to it.

No

ID sylw: 105526

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Christine Stone

Asiant : Gillian Wise

I am writing on behalf of my mother, who lives on Bishop Drive in Long Itchington, to oppose the developments at Cox Crescent and Green Acres Nursing Home (sites 633 & 649, and sites 462, 437, 466 & 478). We acknowledge the need for housing but have serious concerns about flooding. The gardens in the proposed development are already waterlogged, and the current drainage system cannot handle further strain. Additionally, older homes on Marton Road frequently flood, a problem worsened since previous developments. There is also only one exit from the area, contributing to congestion. We strongly urge opposition to these developments.

No

ID sylw: 105530

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan waight

I am formally objecting to the planning application for housing development on Site Ref 623 in Wellesbourne. My concerns include the safety hazards posed by increased vehicle traffic and access on a narrow public footpath, the overuse of local roads, and the site’s high flood risk due to its location in Flood Zone 3. This area is historically significant and contributes to the rural character of the village, which would be disrupted by development. Additionally, Wellesbourne’s infrastructure is already strained, and this proposal would exacerbate existing issues. I urge reconsideration of this development.

No

ID sylw: 105531

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs Wharton

Nifer y bobl: 2

PLANNING OBJECTION SITE 600

We object to the planning application to build up to 52 houses on the field behind the homes on Malthouse lane between the park & the Maltings. Our concerns are an increase in traffic 0n Malthouse lane. Malthouse lane is effectively a cul-de-sac because a lot of people won’t use the Causeway therefore the traffic comes down Malthouse lane & then back up. With this development being approximately 50 houses with an average of 2 cars per household that would equate to a lot more traffic.
Earlswood lakes is a beauty spot and wildlife would be seriously affected.
Other concerns are:-
Lack of schools in the area
Lack of GP Practices
Loss of vegetation & trees
Lack of parking for visitors and Fishermen to Earlswood Lakes

No

ID sylw: 105534

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shane & Ann Dodd

Nifer y bobl: 2

I received a message from a Ullenhall WhatsApp group informing local residents about planning permission being sought for the closed Henley Golf Club land and adjacent areas down to the A4189. We were given a deadline of Friday 7th March to submit objections, but I have not received any official notification or seen advisory posters regarding this matter. I have informed my solicitors to prepare formal protests, and I would like clarification on the situation.

No

ID sylw: 105536

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr GD Fisher

I have concerns regarding the proposed development, which contradicts the stated local planning criteria which should prioritise repurposing existing buildings rather than green-field development. The aesthetics of the rural area will be negatively impacted, especially along Evesham Road, contradicting previous design statements. Additionally, there is a risk of increased flooding for vulnerable residents on Luddington Road, and this development could lead to the encroachment of Luddington Village and loss of agricultural land. Furthermore, the process feels undemocratic, as local input seems disregarded by higher authorities.

Yes

ID sylw: 105538

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stephanie Harris

I am writing on behalf of my mother, to oppose the proposed housing development at Warwickshire Golf Club (Ref ID 2 & 229). It is concerning that green belt land, which should be protected, is being considered for development, threatening local wildlife and biodiversity. This project would also worsen existing infrastructure issues, increasing strain on schools and medical facilities, as well as causing more traffic congestion and pollution. Furthermore, the development risks flooding in the area. My mother moved to this area seeking peace, seclusion, and green space. She would not have moved if she knew the property would be devalued and her privacy encroached on. I urge the council to explore alternative options that would be less damaging to the environment and community.

No

ID sylw: 105540

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Fiona Carless

I object to the proposed development at Lapworth, site ref ID 235. I believe it threatens our rural community and green belt countryside when there are brownfield sites available nearby. Lapworth has heritage properties and attracts tourists, but its narrow lanes and limited pavements cannot support increased traffic from the Swallowfield development. This site is far from essential amenities, which are already strained. Additionally, the local drainage system is inadequate, and the area is prone to flooding. I urge consideration of alternative options that better utilise existing infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 105541

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Blaire and Christian Davies

I have reviewed the SWLP and have significant concerns regarding site ref. ID 184 in Wasperton village. This conservation area is vital for local biodiversity and heritage, and its development would destroy animal habitats and undermine the village's rural character. The site lies outside the Infill Village Boundary and its proposed development contravenes local policies. Additionally, the increase in housing would significantly strain the village's infrastructure and adversely affect residents' privacy and light. Therefore, I strongly object to the inclusion and development of site ref. 184 in the local plan.

No

ID sylw: 105544

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Draper

Ref The HELAA Assessments and "Infill" on all proposed sites in Station Lane, Lapworth:

The number of dwellings proposed are far too many without any further infrastructure available. This includes the full capacity doctors surgery, primary school, road safety and several entrances/exists to proposed and existing developments coming onto Station Lane very close together and creating road hazards, especially near to Lapworth school. It is an overwhelming and over development of land which often floods, if they are all allowed to proceed.

What type of houses will they be? Will there be million pound plus properties or actually affordable for local young residents?

No

ID sylw: 105546

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Pauline Watson

I have concerns regarding the Swallowfield site proposal and the Housing Land Availability Assessment results. My main interest lies in the area's ecology. I object to the development because the site is marshy ground that supports a variety of wildlife, including protected species like toads, newts, and various birds. I believe that any development would permanently damage the local ecology.

No

ID sylw: 105548

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jemma and Henry Gallagher

Nifer y bobl: 2

I am formally objecting to the proposed development at Hockley Heath (site references 31 and 278), due to concerns about its impact on green belt land, local infrastructure, and community health services. The existing infrastructure is already strained, and additional housing would exacerbate congestion and healthcare pressures. The development poses risks of increased flooding, traffic congestion, and road safety issues. Over 3000 dwellings would be added by SG24, C1, and the 18 infill sites 30, 31, 53, 88, 161, 205, 235, 513, 514, 615, 649 and 751 which is not in keeping with the character of the surrounding areas. Furthermore, I believe there are more suitable brownfield sites available. Large-scale development would compromise the rural character and heritage of Hockley Heath and Lapworth.

Other

ID sylw: 105590

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Elliot

I would like to object to the development of site 205, which is adjacent to Rose Cottage on Brome Hall Lane, Lapworth. This land is part of the Roman Fort heritage site at Harborough Banks and is classified as Green Belt. It supports diverse wildlife and local habitats, including deer, hawks, and bats, and serves as a recreational area for the community. Additionally, the site is prone to flooding and has poor drainage, which would exacerbate existing issues. I urge the consideration of site 205 as unsuitable for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 105601

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: T Taylor

I own the site at The Green Snitterfielde, which has significant potential and is included in the Preferred Options for the SWLP. Snitterfield is an inspiring village with essential amenities and a vibrant community. Its location provides easy access to the A46, Stratford-upon-Avon, and the M40, making it desirable, especially with highly regarded schools nearby. The proposed site is central to the village and allows for sensitive development without fundamental expansion. I hope my views will be seriously considered.

No

ID sylw: 105603

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sebastian Apostol

I object to the proposed development at Ref 633 and Reg 469, as it would significantly impact the Lilac Fields estate. Residents were assured that the adjacent field would remain undeveloped. Allowing this proposal would cause disruption from construction vehicles and pose safety risks on our narrow roads. The existing attenuation ponds cannot handle additional runoff from a new housing estate and would harm local wildlife habitats. I advocate for using brownfield sites instead and propose the land be managed by the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust to preserve its ecological value. My family and I strongly oppose the proposed development.

No

ID sylw: 105634

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sarah and Mark Ellis

Nifer y bobl: 2

I formally object to the planning application for housing on Site Ref 623 in Wellesbourne due to multiple concerns. The location is prone to flooding, exacerbating risks for nearby properties and undermining flood defences. Access is inadequate for the expected increase in traffic, posing safety hazards, especially for pedestrians. The development threatens the historic landscape and character of the conservation area, while also straining already overburdened local infrastructure. I urge reconsideration of this proposal to protect Wellesbourne's character and environment, supporting the parish council's objection to further development.

No

ID sylw: 105679

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Julie Jordan

I formally object to the planning application for housing on the field behind “Long Ground” and “The Old Orchard” along Lowes Lane in Wellesbourne (Site Ref 623). My objections include significant flooding risks in Flood Zone 3, inadequate access, increased vehicle movements posing safety hazards, and added traffic congestion. There is a lack of pedestrian infrastructure, and the land holds historical and environmental significance, being part of the Wellesbourne Conservation Area. Additionally, the area’s existing infrastructure is already under strain. I urge reconsideration of this proposal to protect Wellesbourne's character and environment. I also support the parish council's objections to further development in Wellesbourne.

No

ID sylw: 105694

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Patricia and Robert Lander

I am submitting objections to the proposed development plans for our local area of South Warwickshire. Temple Grafton and Ardens Grafton lack essential services, and the local transport infrastructure is inadequate, with issues like parking at the primary school and overflowing train station. I am concerned about increased traffic and pollution, the loss of green spaces, and the ineffective ‘Relief Road’. Promised facilities like schools and a GP surgery have not materialised, and the current infrastructure cannot support the expected population growth. Additionally, sewage discharge issues are already present.

Other

ID sylw: 105706

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Property Development Ltd

Asiant : Carter Jonas

We support the identification of Bidford East (part of HELAA site 562) as part of Strategic Growth Location SG20, which has an estimated housing capacity of 5,361 dwellings. While it ranks poorly in the Sustainability Assessment regarding the loss of Grade 2 agricultural land and the site's ranking for natural resources, we believe that the development will not significantly impact mineral resources. The proposed indicative area for industrial development is previously developed land and will not result in loss of agricultural land. Despite being among the worst for education access, the proximity of primary and secondary schools within reasonable walking distance mitigates this concern. Additionally, bus connections to Alcester enhance sustainability, aligning with the Council's objectives.

Other

ID sylw: 105716

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Property Development Ltd

Asiant : Carter Jonas

Broom Farm is part of HELAA Site 562, identified as Strategic Growth Location SG20 in the Draft Plan. We support its designation, noting that it has an estimated housing capacity of 5,361 dwellings. While it ranks poorly in the Sustainability Assessment regarding the loss of Grade 2 agricultural land and the site's ranking for natural resources, we believe that the development will not significantly impact mineral resources. The proposed indicative area for industrial development is previously developed land and will not result in loss of agricultural land. Despite being among the worst for education access, the proximity of primary and secondary schools within reasonable walking distance mitigates this concern. Additionally, bus connections to Alcester enhance sustainability, aligning with the Council's objectives.

No

ID sylw: 105722

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Claire Hull

I am a resident of Lapworth and wish to formally object to the proposed developments at site 169 and site 30. My key concerns include insufficient infrastructure for increased traffic. A development of this size would cause a significant increase in traffic and a risk to pedestrians. Adverse effects on local wildlife and protected trees. Flooding risks increase due to existing drainage issues, we have land drains installed in our garden as the garden becomes water logged during heavy rain. Inadequate services- Lapworth primary school is small and a housing development of this size would have an considerable impact on the number of places available to the rural children surround Lapworth as well as healthcare provisions. I chose to live in this area for its small village feel, and I believe the proposed housing will negatively impact the community.

No

ID sylw: 105730

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Nalty

I would like to object to the inclusion in the Local plan of the Site on the HLAA Part A list I believe is referred to as Site 664 Land of Offchurch Lane in Radford Semele. The site is also shown on the attached screenshot of the interactive map between East of Church Lane and North of Offchurch Lane. This package of land has been given "Local Green Space" status in the Radford Semele Neighbourhood Development Plan. Consequently, in accordance with NPPF paragraph 11 d ii it should be excluded a a site for sustainable development and therefore should not be referred to as a Preferred Site. I would therefore ask you to remove the site from the list of preferred sites in the Proposed Local Plan.

Other

ID sylw: 105741

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Phil Smith

I am a Lapworth resident and I oppose the development at Ref ID 22- Land north east of Kingswood Cottages, OWR for several reasons. Firstly, it threatens the Green Belt's purpose in preventing urban sprawl and preserving the countryside. Secondly, it would strain local infrastructure, as roads, schools, and healthcare cannot cope with the increased population. Furthermore, it endangers local biodiversity and habitats, especially near the Canal Conservation Area. Additionally, the feasibility of the project is questionable without clear infrastructure plans. Lastly, the development could disrupt the community's character, and I urge the planning committee to reconsider its inclusion in the SWLP.

No

ID sylw: 105756

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Berrys

We are commenting on the HELAA part B score of 75.2 for the land at Lodge Farm, Poolhead Lane, Earlswood, as we disagree with several scores. We believe the entire site should receive a higher score for its location within Priority Area 3 and a lower score for its weak contribution to the Green Belt. Additionally, we argue that there are no site constraints affecting viability and that scores for carbon sequestration, surface water flooding, heritage assessment, transport assessment, SSSI, and ancient woodland should be revised downwards, resulting in a significantly reduced overall score of 51.

No

ID sylw: 105764

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Wates Developments Ltd

Asiant : Savills

We are providing comments on the HELAA results for site reference 736. The site scores poorly in flood risk due to 16% being in Flood Zone 2 or 3. Land within close proximity to Thelsford Brook should be removed from the Growth Option. Appendix 3 shows that all development can be located outside of areas at risk of flooding. Although the site has moderate visual sensitivity, it is not in a protected landscape area, and localised visibility can be managed. Connectivity to Wellesbourne is good, and employment development near the University of Warwick is feasible. 22% of the site is within Grade 1 or 2 Agricultural Land but the majority is Grade 3. The vast majority of the SWLP area is within Grades 1, 2 or 3, so the SWLP will likely need to release some 'best and most versatile' land.